[A.1. Invocation - Rev. David Young, St. Paul Lutheran Church]
[00:00:07]
EVENING, AND WELCOME TO THE NOVEMBER 25TH, 2025 REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. BEFORE WE BEGIN THE MEETING, LET ME REVIEW THE PROCEDURES FOR THE MEETING. IF YOU'D LIKE TO SPEAK, COMPLETE A REQUEST TO SPEAK FORM LOCATED IN THE ENTRANCE TO THE COUNCIL CHAMBER AND SUBMIT THE COMPLETED FORM AT THE SERGEANT AT ARMS. WHEN YOUR NAME HAS BEEN CALLED, USE THE MICROPHONE AT THE LECTERN ON THE AUDIENCE'S RIGHT AND EITHER STATE YOUR NAME AND ADDRESS, OR YOUR NAME AND CITY. SPEAK TO THE CITY COUNCIL. THE BODY. DO NOT ADDRESS THE MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS INDIVIDUALLY. BE MINDFUL THE TIMER ON THE LECTERN AND WRAP UP YOUR COMMENT BEFORE YOUR SPEAKING TIME ENDS. THE TIME LIMITS ARE POSTED ON THE REQUEST TO SPEAK FORMS. AN APPLICANT REPRESENT A PERSON WHO HAS A LEGAL STANDING TO SUPPORT OR OPPOSE A QUASI JUDICIAL MATTER WILL BE PERMITTED UP TIME, AS DETERMINED BY THE CITY COUNCIL, TO CREATE A RECORD BEFORE THE CITY COUNCIL. ANY PERSON WHO MAKES A PERSONAL AND OR SLANDEROUS REMARKS, OR BECOMES BOISTEROUS AND DISRESPECTFUL WHILE ADDRESSING THE CITY COUNCIL, WILL BE ORDERED TO LEAVE THE COUNCIL CHAMBER. THANK YOU FOR JOINING US THIS EVENING. WE'LL BEGIN WITH THE INVOCATION. IF YOU WISH TO PARTICIPATE, PLEASE STAND.
TONIGHT WILL BE REVEREND DAVID YOUNG OF THE SAINT PAUL LUTHERAN CHURCH. CREATOR OF ALL.
WE GATHER TONIGHT AS LEADERS AND MEMBERS OF THIS COMMUNITY SEEKING GUIDANCE AND WISDOM AS WE DISCUSS AND DECIDE ON MATTERS THAT IMPACT OUR CITY. GRANT US OPEN EARS TO LISTEN, OPEN MINDS TO CONSIDER, AND OPEN HEARTS TO SERVE. MAY OUR DECISIONS REFLECT COMPASSION, JUSTICE, AND EQUITY, BENEFITING ALL MEMBERS OF OUR COMMUNITY, THE HAUGHTY AND THE HUNGRY, THE PRIVILEGED AND THE POOR, THOSE WITH HOMES AND THOSE SEEKING SHELTER. MAY WE PRIORITIZE THE WELL-BEING OF ALL, ESPECIALLY THE MOST VULNERABLE. BLESS ALL WHO HAVE ATTENDED THIS MEETING, AND MAY OUR COLLECTIVE EFFORTS BRING PROSPERITY, PEACE AND UNITY TO OUR CITY. AND MAY IT BE SO. AMEN. AMEN. THANK YOU, REVEREND DAVID YOUNG, JOIN US FOR THE PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE. I PLEDGE ALLEGIANCE TO THE FLAG OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, AND TO THE REPUBLIC FOR WHICH IT STANDS. ONE NATION UNDER GOD, INDIVISIBLE, WITH LIBERTY AND JUSTICE FOR ALL. ROLL CALL. MR. MCEWEN. COUNCILMEMBER. BASSETT. COUNCILMEMBER. HANLEY. COUNCILMEMBER. KENNEDY.
COUNCILMEMBER. SMITH. COUNCILMEMBER. LARUSSO. VICE MAYOR NEWMAN, MAYOR ALFREY. AND
[A.4. Proclamations and Presentations]
I AM HERE. WE'RE GOING TO HAVE PROCLAMATION PROCLAMATIONS AND PRESENTATIONS. I HAVE AT LEAST ONE. MISTER JACKSON ISN'T HERE. I OVER TO. YOUR LITTLE COMMENT SHEETS RIGHT THERE. PERFECT.MISTER JAMES HILL, COME ON UP. SIR. HOW YOU BEEN, MA'AM? GOOD TO SEE YOU. YOU TOO. THIS IS THE PRESENTATION OF THE VOLUNTEER MILESTONE OF SERVICE AWARD FOR JAMES HILL FOR 20 YEARS OF SERVICE ON THE CODE ENFORCEMENT BOARD, YOU BEGIN YOUR VOLUNTEER SERVICE IN DECEMBER OF 2004. THROUGH THE THE PAST TWO DECADES, MISTER TILL DEMONSTRATED THE SPIRIT OF VOLUNTEERISM, GIVING HIS TIME, ENERGY, AND SKILLS TO SERVE. HIS SERVICE REPRESENTS WHAT IT MEANS TO BE A MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY. AND WE THANK YOU FOR YOUR DEDICATION. AND YOU KNOW, YOU'VE BEEN HERE A LONG TIME AND YOU'VE SERVED THE CITY. A LOT OF PEOPLE ARE NOT AWARE OF WHAT THE SERVICE REQUIRES. AND, YOU KNOW, THE ENDLESS, YOU KNOW, JUST GIVING AND YOU DON'T GET PAID FOR IT. YOU JUST COME HERE AND YOU, YOU DO THE BEST YOU CAN. SO I WANT TO GIVE THIS LITTLE TOKEN OF THE APPRECIATION IS 20 YEARS THAT THAT'S WHAT YOU GET. THAT'S IT, THAT'S IT. THANK YOU. I JUST WANT EVERYBODY TO KNOW THE CODE BOARD DOES DO A REALLY GOOD JOB KEEPING THE CITY SAFE FOR ALL OCCUPANTS. I HAVE TONIGHT WITH ME, MY WIFE OF 50 YEARS. WE JUST CELEBRATED LAST MONTH OF 50. I HAVE MY THREE CHILDREN AND FOUR OF MY GRANDCHILDREN.
THE FIFTH ONE'S IN MASSACHUSETTS. SHE COULDN'T MAKE IT TONIGHT. BUT IF YOU GUYS WOULD STAND, I'D APPRECIATE IT AND LET EVERYBODY SEE YOU ARE. THANK YOU, THANK
[00:05:06]
YOU SIR. THANK YOU AGAIN. APPRECIATE IT. THANK YOU. HEY REAL QUICK COME HERE. PICTURE.COUNCIL. YOU WANT TO COME DOWN. OH COME ON GUYS COME ON GUYS GALS GUYS AND GALS. OKAY. GOOD.
THANK YOU. OKAY. THANK YOU THANK YOU, THANK YOU FOR SURE. YEAH, ALMOST. ALMOST THERE. ALL RIGHT. 123. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. WE DON'T GO CRAZY. OKAY? I WANTED TO COME UP AND SEE YOU BECAUSE. YOU KNOW. YEAH, EVEN. CONGRATULATIONS. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. OKAY. OKAY. NEXT UP WE HAVE OUR SERVICE AWARDS FOR OUR EMPLOYEES. AND SO WE HAVE TWO THAT WE ARE HONORING TONIGHT. AND WE'LL START OFF WE HAVE 125 YEARS OF SERVICE AND 130 YEARS OF SERVICE. AND JUST SO YOU KNOW, WE'LL WE'LL WE'LL CALL YOU UP ONE AT A TIME, BUT DON'T LEAVE RIGHT AWAY BECAUSE THEN WE'LL BRING YOU BOTH BACK UP TOGETHER AND GET A PICTURE WITH COUNCIL. SO WE'LL START OFF WITH 25 YEARS OF SERVICE. WE HAVE RICK SMITH. SO IF YOU CAN COME ON UP HERE. AND SO RICK SMITH HAS BEEN WITH OUR TRAFFIC OPERATIONS, WITH OUR TRAFFIC OPERATIONS DIVISION.
AND. AND HAS MORE THAN 40 YEARS DEVOTED TO KEEPING COMMUNITIES SAFE AND MOVING. RICK BEGAN HIS CAREER IN THE AIR FORCE AS AN AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLER TECHNICIAN, WHERE HE DEVELOPED THE PRECISION AND CALM THAT WOULD GUIDE HIS LIFELONG WORK. AFTER 16 YEARS OF MAINTAINING TRAFFIC SIGNALS FOR BALTIMORE COUNTY, MARYLAND, HE BROUGHT HIS EXPERTISE TO MELBOURNE IN 2000 AS A SIGNAL TECHNICIAN. FROM HIS EARLY DAYS IN A SMALL OFFICE AT THE APOLLO POLICE DEPARTMENT, TO HIS PROMOTION TO SENIOR SIGNAGE OR SENIOR SIGNAL TECHNICIAN IN 2017. HE'S BEEN THE HEART OF THE CITY'S EVOLUTION IN SIGNAL SIGNAL MAINTENANCE, SIGNAL OPERATION, SO HE'S SEEN THE SYSTEM DEVELOP FROM THE DAYS OF MECHANICAL TIMERS TO FIBER CONNECTED ADVANCED TRAFFIC MANAGEMENT SYSTEM. AND THAT'S WHAT KEEPS THE MELBOURNE'S ROADS AND THE TRAFFIC FLOWING SMOOTHLY TODAY. SO RICK HAS PERSONALLY MAINTAINED OR UPGRADED NEARLY EVERY SIGNALIZED INTERSECTION IN THE CITY. AND WE ARE STILL AT 67. OR THERE'S MORE NOW 69.
YES, THERE'S THE TWO, TWO NEW ONES. SORRY. AND HIS WORK WITH DOT, THAT'S FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, BREVARD COUNTY AND CITY DEPARTMENTS HAS IMPROVED SAFETY, EFFICIENCY AND RELIABILITY FOR EVERY DRIVER AND PEDESTRIAN IN MELBOURNE. SO RICK TAKES PRIDE IN KEEPING UP WITH TECHNOLOGY, TRAINING TECHNICIANS AND GETTING THE CITY GOING AGAIN AFTER A STORM.
SO FOR 25 YEARS, RICK'S COMMITMENT, SKILL AND SERVICE HAVE HELPED KEEP MELBOURNE MOVING FORWARD AND WE THANK HIM FOR HIS DEDICATION AND HIS LASTING IMPACT TO OUR CITY. AND HE IS RETIRING SOON. AND SO HE'S RETIRING IN JANUARY OF THIS YEAR. AND I WANTED TO POINT OUT THAT HIS WIFE, KATHY WAS ABLE TO MAKE IT TONIGHT. THERE WAS SHE HAD TO MOVE MOUNTAINS, I THINK, TO BE HERE TONIGHT. BUT THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR JOINING US, AND THANK YOU FOR LETTING US HAVE HIM FOR 25 YEARS. SO WITH THAT, I'LL TURN IT OVER. OKAY. DO YOU WANT TO SPEAK OR REAL QUICK? THIS IS A LITTLE TOKEN OF OUR APPRECIATION FOR 25 YEARS OF SERVICE. AND IF YOU'LL SAY A FEW WORDS, THAT'D BE NICE. I KIND OF GOT TO. I JUST APPRECIATE THE RECOGNITION. IT'S BEEN A PRIVILEGE TO WORK FOR THE CITY OF MELBOURNE ARE A GREAT ORGANIZATION, AND I'M SURE THINGS WILL KEEP MOVING WHEN I'M WHEN I'M GONE. SO THANKS AGAIN. ALL RIGHT. WHAT WE'LL DO. YEAH. OKAY. SORRY ABOUT THAT. AND NEXT UP IS 30 YEARS OF SERVICE AND THAT'S ELIZABETH RICH. 30 YEARS, 30 YEARS. SO ELIZABETH IS A NATIVE MELBOURNIAN. I GUESS THAT'S REALLY A WORD. E.G. OKAY, WHO WENT TO WORK AFTER HIGH SCHOOL
[00:10:06]
SERVING HER COMMUNITY AS A BREVARD COUNTY SHERIFF'S EMERGENCY DISPATCHER FROM 1990 TO 1995. OKAY, SORRY, I REALIZED I WAS TALKING WITHOUT THE MICROPHONE. I'M LOUD.ANYWAY, SO. SO SHE CAME TO WORK FOR THE CITY OF MELBOURNE POLICE DEPARTMENT'S EMERGENCY CALL CENTER ON APOLLO BOULEVARD IN NOVEMBER OF 1995 AS AN EMERGENCY DISPATCHER, AFTER 11 YEARS IN TOTAL AS AN EMERGENCY DISPATCHER, ELIZABETH WANTED A POSITION THAT WAS LESS EMOTIONALLY STRESSFUL AND BETTER FOR HER YOUNG FAMILY. SO IN APRIL OF 2001, SHE STARTED IN FLEET MANAGEMENT DIVISION AS A CLERICAL ASSISTANT POSITION. SHE OR IN A CLERICAL POSITION.
SHE WORKED FOR FOUR DIFFERENT FLEET MANAGERS AND HAS SEEN A LOT OF ADVANCEMENTS, LIKE NO LONGER HAVING TO LOG ALL THE DAILY FUEL TRANSACTIONS BY HAND, OR HAVING TO STAMP EVERY SINGLE INVOICE FOR EVERY AUTOMOTIVE PART THAT WAS USED EACH DAY. SO, LIKE RICK, YOU'VE SEEN A LOT OF CHANGES SINCE YOU'VE BEEN HERE. WELL, WELL. BUT YOU KEPT THINGS MOVING SO THAT OUR CARS WERE MOVING. SO SHE ELIZABETH CONTINUES TO SERVE THE CITY AS FLEET MANAGEMENT TECHNICIAN, AND SHE HOPES OR SHE PLANS TO BE HERE UNTIL 2031. AND SO HER HUSBAND HAS JOINED US TONIGHT IN THIS IN HONORING OF ELIZABETH'S 30 YEARS OF SERVICE. AND THANK YOU FOR SHARING HER WITH US. OKAY. O'GALLEY. RIGHT. OH, YEAH. SO ANYWAY, HOW MANY YEARS YOU GOT LEFT? QUITE A FEW.
SIX, SIX MORE YEARS, THAT'D BE. WOW, 36. SO 30 YEARS. I WANT TO SAY A FEW WORDS. GOING TO HAVE TO KNOW I KNOW YOU. I FIGURED YOU WOULDN'T, BUT. YEAH, IF WE COULD COME UP AND GET A PICTURE AND THIS IS A LITTLE TOKEN FOR 30 YEARS, IT'S NOT MUCH, BUT THERE'S A GIFT CARD. THERE'S THERE IS. THERE'S A GIFT CARD IN IT. NO. SO, COUNCIL, IF YOU WANT TO JOIN US FOR OUR SERVICE AWARDS, WE'LL MAKE YOU GET UP TWICE TONIGHT. YEAH. SET THIS ON. JUSTICE IS SPOT AGAIN. YEAH.
THANK YOU. SO NOW I'M REALLY. MAYBE I'LL WALK TO THE OTHER SIDE. OTHER SIDE. WE'RE GOING DOWN, BOYS. YEAH, OKAY. READY? ONE. TWO THREE. OKAY. THANK YOU. SORRY. NOPE. YEAH. OKAY. ALL
[A.5. Approval of Minutes - November 13, 2025 Workshop Meeting and Regular Meeting]
RIGHT, MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER FIVE. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES. NOVEMBER 13TH WORKSHOP AND REGULAR CITY COUNCIL MEETING. MAYOR, I MOVE FOR APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES FROM THE LAST WORKSHOP AND COUNCIL MEETING. SECOND OF A MOTION BY MR. SMITH. AND I'M SORRY, MR. KENNEDY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? I VOTE AYE, AND THAT MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON[A.6. City Manager's Report]
TO SIX. CITY MANAGER'S REPORT. YES. I WANT TO POINT OUT THAT THE CITY MANAGER'S REPORT THAT IS IN YOUR AGENDA PACKAGE HAS QUITE A FEW UPCOMING EVENTS. AND SO IF YOU COULD PAY ATTENTION OR JUST BROWSE THROUGH THERE SO YOU KNOW WHAT'S COMING UP, SUCH AS TREE LIGHTINGS AND VARIOUS MEETINGS THAT ARE GOING ON. ALSO THAT'S IN THE WRITTEN REPORT IS DURING A ROUTINE INSPECTION OF OUR BRIDGES. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION CONTACTED US THAT THE APOLLO BRIDGE CROSSING OF A GALLIE RIVER HAD DAMAGED, CAUSED BY FIRES BEING SET UNDERNEATH IT. THERE'S NOT IMMINENT DANGER, BUT WE DO NEED TO ACT IN A FAIRLY QUICK MANNER, AND OBVIOUSLY THIS IS AN UNEXPECTED EXPENSE FOR US. SO MORE WILL BE COMING FORWARD AS WE ESTABLISH A BUDGET AND HAVE A BETTER HANDLE ON IT. SO ANYWAY, I JUST WANTED TO BRING THAT TO YOUR ATTENTION. MAYOR. OKAY, GOOD. SIR, I WAS APPROACHED BY THE CITY ATTORNEY, AND HE ALSO WANTED TO TALK ABOUT EMAIL THAT HE HAD SENT US EARLIER TODAY. DID YOU WANT TO GO INTO THAT DURING THIS TIME? DO YOU WANT? I'M HAPPY TO IF IF THAT'S A DESIRE TO HAVE PART OF[00:15:03]
THAT DISCUSSION NOW. SO FROM LAST COUNCIL MEETING THERE, THERE WAS A REQUEST FOR ME TO LOOK INTO WHAT THE CODE AND STATUTORY PROCEDURES ARE FOR SUSPENSION OR REMOVAL OF AN APPOINTED BOARD MEMBER. YOU RECEIVED AN EMAIL FROM ME ON ON FRIDAY WITH MEMORANDUM KIND OF OUTLINING MY ANALYSIS OF OF THAT STATUTE AND KIND OF WHERE WE WERE WITH THAT, WITH THAT PROCESS. AND, AND MY ULTIMATE RECOMMENDATION THAT THAT WE NOT MOVE FORWARD, THAT THE, THE ALLEGED GROUNDS DON'T, DON'T FIT NEATLY WITHIN THE THE STATUTE. THAT BEING SAID, THE I DID POINT OUT SOME OTHER OPTIONS THAT COUNCIL HAD AND THESE THIS WAS NOT A MUTUALLY EXCLUSIVE LIST. RIGHT. BUT THERE WAS YOU KNOW, IF WE WANTED TO SEEK ADDITIONAL CLARIFICATION FROM THE FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL ON THE MEANING OF MISFEASANCE AND MALFEASANCE WITHIN THE STATUTE AND TO CONFIRM WHETHER OR NOT THOSE TERMS REFER TO CONDUCT WITHIN THE OFFICIAL DUTIES AND CAPACITY OF OF THOSE APPOINTED BOARD MEMBERS, WE COULD DO THAT.AND THEN AGAIN, YOU KNOW, IT IS A INHERENT FUNCTION OF COUNCIL TO CONSIDER CENSURE, WHETHER IT BE OF ITS MEMBERS. AND I THINK THAT EXTENDS TO THOSE THAT ARE APPOINTED AS ITS ADVISERS OR, OR OTHER OR OTHER THINGS. SO YOU'LL SEE, AS ONE OF THE BLUE SHEET MEMOS, THE VICE MAYOR HAD ASKED AT LEAST TO DRAFT A PROPOSED RESOLUTION THAT MAY RELATE TO SEEKING GUIDANCE FROM THE FLORIDA ATTORNEY GENERAL. IF THAT'S THE DIRECTION TONIGHT, WE CAN ADD IT AS AGENDA ITEM 13.
AND AGAIN, IF THERE'S OTHER QUESTIONS ON THE ON THE MEMO OR OTHER DISCUSSION POINTS ON OTHER OPTIONS MOVING FORWARD, I'M HAPPY TO FIELD THOSE. OH GO AHEAD. SO WITH THAT IN MIND AND I PUT SOME THOUGHT INTO IT, ESPECIALLY AFTER TALKING TO OUR CITY ATTORNEY, MR. CONLEY. I'M TRYING TO FIND BASICALLY A WAY FOR US TO KIND OF, YOU KNOW, MOVE ON BASICALLY FROM THE SUBJECT. AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THERE'S THERE'S A GOOD MIDDLE GROUND HERE BECAUSE SOME OF THE OPTIONS ARE OKAY. NOW IT'S GOING UP TO THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. ANOTHER OPTION IS A WHAT DO YOU CALL A CITY CHARTER AMENDMENT. AND IT PROLONGS WHAT'S GOING ON HERE.
AND I THINK THAT THERE'S A MIDDLE GROUND THAT EVERYONE CAN GET BEHIND AND WOULD MOVE US KIND OF FORWARD PAST THIS INCIDENT. SO AND THAT WOULD BE A VERBAL CENSURE. AND I WOULD MAKE A MOTION TO DO SO. AND JUST TO TO REITERATE THE FACTS OF WHAT HAPPENED HERE, YOU KNOW, WE'RE TALKING ABOUT THE CHARLIE KIRK STREET NAMING AN INDIVIDUAL WHO WAS A YOUNGER MAN WHO WAS SHOT AND KILLED FOR HIS POLITICAL BELIEFS. AFTER THAT, I WENT DOWN TO TALK TO RESIDENTS. WE HAD A RECESS TO KIND OF CLEAR THE ROOM, WAS TALKING TO RESIDENTS, AND THEN MISS MINAS APPROACHED ME, DIDN'T EVEN KNOW SHE WAS IN THE MEETING, AND THREE TIMES SAID THAT SHE, I'M GOING TO KILL YOU TO ME. I TRIED TO DEESCALATE. I TRIED TO CLARIFY THAT WAS WHAT WAS GOING ON IN THAT CONVERSATION. THAT BEING SAID, AFTER IT REALLY KIND OF WASHED OVER AND HIT ME. DURING THE MEETING, I TALKED TO THE CHIEF OF POLICE AFTERWARDS, FILED A POLICE REPORT. AFTER I LEFT HERE, I WENT TO THE POLICE STATION, FILED A REPORT. NOW, THAT BEING SAID, THERE'S BEEN TALK ABOUT THE STATE ATTORNEY'S OFFICE. I TALKED TO OUR STATE ATTORNEY EARLIER. THE DIFFERENCE, THE WAY THAT THINGS ARE NOWADAYS, WE'RE IN A MODERN ERA THERE. THERE ARE AT LEAST THAT I CAN COUNT FOUR WITNESSES PLUS MYSELF TO THIS INCIDENT.
BUT WITH AUDIO AND VISUAL BEING THE NORM FOR CASES, THAT IS WHY THINGS DON'T MOVE FORWARD. IT'S NOT JUST BASED OFF WHAT INDIVIDUALS SAY, BECAUSE AGAIN, IT'S ALL ABOUT HOW THINGS GO IN FRONT OF A JURY. BUT HE SAID, CLEARLY, THE STATE'S ATTORNEY'S OFFICE BELIEVES THAT THIS OCCURRED. THERE ARE WITNESSES PRESENT TODAY THAT ARE IN THE AUDIENCE. IF THERE ARE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THE VALIDITY OF THAT. BUT NOT ONLY THAT, OUR POLICE DEPARTMENT, THE MELBOURNE POLICE DEPARTMENT, DID AN INVESTIGATION, AND I THINK WE HAVE A GOOD POLICE DEPARTMENT. AND THE CONCLUSION OF THE REPORT WAS THROUGH MY DETECTIVE, MOFFAT SAID. THROUGH MY INVESTIGATION, AFTER SPEAKING WITH EYEWITNESSES AND THE VICTIM, I CONCLUDED THAT YVONNE MINUS THREATENED TO PUBLIC SERVANT WHILE ATTENDING A CITY COUNCIL MEETING, A VIOLATION OF FLORIDA STATE STATUTE. 836 .12 2AI SUBMITTED A REQUEST FOR PROSECUTION, SO OUR OWN POLICE DEPARTMENT SUBMITTED A REQUEST FOR PROSECUTION. NOW, WE'RE IN A TOUGH ENVIRONMENT IN THIS COUNTRY RIGHT NOW. THERE'S THIS THIS INDIVIDUAL. HER NAME WAS MELISSA HORTMAN HARTMAN. SHE WAS UP IN MINNESOTA. SHE WAS MURDERED IN A POLITICAL BASED SHOOTING. SO WAS JOHN HOFFMAN. UP IN MINNESOTA, PRESIDENT TRUMP WAS SHOT AND ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION TWICE. IT'S UNFORTUNATE THAT WE'RE IN THIS PLACE, BUT WE CANNOT NORMALIZE THIS BEHAVIOR BY DOING NOTHING. WE NORMALIZE IT IS OKAY TO GO AND THREATEN SOMEBODY IN THE CITY OF MELBOURNE. I'M SORRY THE THE ENVIRONMENTS LIKE THIS, BUT WE CANNOT DO THAT. SO AGAIN, LIKE I SAID, I BELIEVE THE CENSURE IT'S A VERBAL CENSURE. JUST A MOTION. SECOND, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. THAT WOULD I THINK BE A MIDDLE GROUND SHOULD BE ABLE TO KEEP
[00:20:04]
HER BOARDS. THERE'S NOTHING GOING ON THERE. BUT WE JUST SAY WE DO NOT CONDONE SAYING I'M GOING TO KILL YOU MULTIPLE TIMES AS A MEMBER OF BOARDS IN THE CITY OF MELBOURNE. SO I'D LIKE TO MAKE A MOTION TO CENSURE MISS MINUS. OKAY, I'LL SECOND THAT MOTION FOR DISCUSSION. OKAY. SO SO YOU'RE SAYING TO PUT IT INTO THIS, IT WOULD BE BASICALLY A VERBAL CENSURE, A VERBAL VERBAL CENSURE. BECAUSE BECAUSE IT'S INAPPROPRIATE. RIGHT. BECAUSE MY MY GOAL HERE IS TO, YOU KNOW, BUILD A BRIDGE BECAUSE YOU, YOU KNOW, MISS MINUS SERVED THE CITY FOR MANY YEARS. YOU YOU SERVE IT NOW IN YOUR CAPACITY. AND I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT THAT WE MOVE ON FROM HERE AND TO ENSURE THAT WE, YOU KNOW, THAT THAT WE CAN CONTINUE TO CONDUCT CITY BUSINESS BECAUSE, I MEAN, YOU, YOU CONSTANTLY GET PEOPLE HERE THAT JUST WANT TO HAVE THEIR OWN AGENDA, THAT WANT TO JUST THROW STUFF OUT. AND, YOU KNOW, FOR WHATEVER REASONS. BUT AGAIN, I'D LIKE TO SEE US MOVE FORWARD FOR YOUR SAKE. AND, YOU KNOW, MISS MINUSES SAKE. SO. SO THAT WOULD BE VERBAL CENSURE. SO BECAUSE, MAN, YOU KIND OF GO AHEAD, MA'AM. AND I THINK YOU WERE JUST GOING TO ASK THIS. CAN I JUST HAVE A CLARIFICATION OF WHAT THAT VERBAL IS? I'M STILL MAKING SURE, YVONNE. AND TO THIS COUNCIL, I THINK THE THE VICE-MAYOR MADE THE MOTION. SO I IT WAS MY UNDERSTANDING HE WAS EFFECTIVELY SAYING THAT WE TO EFFECTIVELY TO THE EXTENT THAT CONDUCT OCCURRED. THE CITY COUNCIL DOESN'T CONDONE THAT THAT CONDUCT. BUT I WOULD ASK THE VICE MAYOR TO TO CLARIFY THE THE CENSURE HE'S LOOKING FOR AS AS PART OF HIS MOTION. YEAH. IT'S JUST THIS BODY JUST DOES NOT CONDONE BOARD MEMBERS TO OF OUR THAT ARE SERVING THE CITY OF MELBOURNE TO SAY I'M GOING TO KILL YOU MULTIPLE TIMES TO THIS. IT WOULD BE ABOUT THAT PARTICULAR INCIDENT, BUT THERE WOULD BE NO SHE WOULDN'T BE REMOVED FROM HER BOARDS. THERE'S NO, THERE'S THERE'S NOTHING ELSE THAT KIND OF GOES ALONG WITH THAT. JUST A STATEMENT SAYING IN THE CITY OF MELBOURNE WE DON'T DO POLITICAL THREATS. I HAVE A REALLY HARD TIME WITH THAT. I'VE READ THE POLICE REPORT AND THERE WAS ONE OF YOUR WITNESSES THAT STATED YOU WERE THE ONE WHO SAID, CAN YOU CLARIFY THE QUOTE, PLEASE? YOUR WITNESS? I MEAN, THAT MEANS A QUOTE FROM ONE OF YOUR WITNESSES. OKAY. RIGHT. YOU'RE YOU'RE WITNESS SAID IN THAT REPORT, YOU KIND OF GLOSSING OVER A LOT OF INFORMATION HERE THAT SAID, YOU WERE THE ONE WHO SAID, I FEEL LIKE I'M BEING SHE WAS STANDING THERE AND YOU SAID, I FEEL LIKE EVERYBODY WANTS TO KILL ME. AND SHE JUST KIND OF WENT, YEAH, I WANT TO KILL YOU AS A JOKE. AND I CAN CLARIFY THAT COMPLETELY. I'M LIKE GOING, NO, YOU DIDN'T. YOU'RE THE ONE.YOU'RE THE ONE WHO FIRST SAID IT. AND THAT'S WHY I DID NOT SAY IT FIRST. THAT'S NOT TRUE.
AND HE'S HERE. IF YOU WANNA TALK TO HIM. I'M NOT GOING TO TALK TO HER IN THE DAMN REPORT.
WELL, NO, I UNDERSTAND THAT THE REPORT THAT HIS REPORT IS IN THERE WITH HANLEY, MISS HANLEY.
SO THAT'S ALREADY. THAT'S A LEGAL DOCUMENT. IT IS. AND THE OTHER WITNESS SAID SHE APPROACHED ME AND SAID THAT SHE SAID IT FIRST. WELL, I, I WILL SAY IF I CAN IF I CAN INTERJECT, I DON'T THINK I THINK WE CAN ALL AGREE THAT, THAT ANY KIND OF BEHAVIOR LIKE THAT'S UNACCEPTABLE FOR ANYBODY TO SAY THAT. I MEAN, REGARDLESS OF WHO IT IS. AND I'M JUST SAYING ANYBODY, YOU KNOW, MY MY GOAL IS TO MOVE FORWARD FROM HERE. AND I JUST DON'T BELIEVE THAT SHE SHOULD BE CENSORED FOR ANY REASON. HE SHE JUST REPEATED WHAT HE SAID AND NOW SHE'S GETTING CENSORED. WELL, YEAH. VERBAL CENSURE. THAT'S WHAT HE'S THAT'S WHAT HE'S INDICATING. I'M I DON'T AGREE WITH IT MAYOR. GO AHEAD MA'AM. AND I THINK THAT'S WHERE I WAS ASKING FOR CLARIFICATION OF VERBAL CENSURE, BECAUSE TO ME THE WORD CENSURE MEANS WE'RE ASKING HER TO NOT SAY ANYTHING LIKE TO KEEP HER FROM SAYING IT'S MORE FOR. YOU SHOULDN'T HAVE SAID THAT, RIGHT? YEAH. SO I THINK THE DEFINITION OF CENSURE IS A LITTLE. YEAH. AND TO BE TO BE CLEAR, WE'RE NOT TALKING ABOUT A CENSOR, RIGHT? WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A CENSURE AS A, AS BASICALLY A FORM OF, OF VERBAL PUNISHMENT OR, OR AGAIN, RIGHT. IT'S A, IT'S COUNCIL AS A BODY DECIDING TO SAY WE, WE DON'T APPROVE OF SOMETHING. RIGHT. OKAY. THANK YOU FOR THAT CLARIFICATION. OKAY. GOOD. SIR. SO SO SO I'M LISTENING IN. SO AGAIN MILITARY BACKGROUND. SO WE HAD LETTERS OF REPRIMAND AND LETTERS OF YOU KNOW WHAT. WE WOULD HAVE OUR MULTIPLE STAGES AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SO I WOULD HAVE TO SAY A COUPLE OF THINGS HERE. ONE IS I LISTEN TO WHAT COUNCILWOMAN HANLEY JUST SAID. AND I DID READ THAT ALSO. AND I WAS I WAS WONDERING IF WE WERE GOING TO GET CLARIFICATION ON THAT. AND THEN THE OTHER POINT THAT I WOULD HAVE TO SAY IS THAT WE ARE WHEN WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DECORUM, DECORUM HAS TO GO BOTH
[00:25:05]
WAYS, RIGHT? SO IF IF THIS IS THE I DON'T KNOW IF THIS IS THE FIRST TIME THIS HAS HAPPENED, WE'RE BOTH NEW. IT SHOULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED BECAUSE LANGUAGE LIKE THAT IS JUST, YOU KNOW, I DID NOT HEAR IT MYSELF. BUT DECORUM IS IMPORTANT, RIGHT. AND THAT'S REALLY THE AND THAT'S REALLY THE POINT OF I THINK OF WHAT IT IS THAT WE'RE TRYING TO STATE. SO I DON'T KNOW IF CENSURE IS THE RIGHT WORD, BUT IF IT IS, SOMETHING PROBABLY SHOULD BE STATED. BUT I'M GLAD TO THE FACT THAT WE HAVE SORT OF DE-ESCALATED WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT BOARD REMOVAL, WE'RE NOT LOOKING AT. AND THAT YOU, VICE MAYOR, I ALSO WOULD WANT YOU TO AND YOU AND YOU SORT OF DONE THAT. YOU SORT OF COME TO GRIPS TO WHAT HAS HAPPENED AND YOU AND YOU'RE PUTTING OUT TO SAY, HEY, I WANT TO MOVE FORWARD FROM THIS. BUT YOU KNOW SOMETHING? IF THAT'S WHAT HAPPENED, SOMETHING NEEDS TO BE STATED. YEAH, YEAH. THANK YOU. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO YOU GOT GOT SOMETHING. JUST A QUICK QUESTION. IS THERE ANY POTENTIAL CHANCE THAT YVONNE MAKES A PUBLIC APOLOGY AND YOU PUBLICLY ACCEPT IT? I MEAN, IF SHE WANTS TO, SHE'S NOW REACHED OUT TO ME. I'M MORE THAN HAPPY TO TO TALK TO HER. IF SHE WANTS TO APOLOGIZE, AND I CAN, I CAN DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT. I'M ABSOLUTELY INTERESTED IN TALKING TO HER ABOUT THAT. BUT BUT BUT THAT'S NOT THAT'S NOT HAPPENED YET AT THIS TIME BECAUSE THIS IS VERY PUBLIC RIGHT NOW. OF COURSE. I MEAN, IT'S GONE ACROSS ALL MEDIA. YEAH. SO IF THERE'S AN OPPORTUNITY FOR US TO TURN DOWN THE TEMPERATURE, AS YOU SAID, YOU KNOW, FOLLOWING YOUR, YOUR LEAD, I THINK THAT MIGHT BE ONE THING THAT WE COULD LOOK AT IF YOU'RE WILLING TO LOOK AT IT, VICE MAYOR, IF WE'RE WILLING TO LOOK AT IT AS A COUNCIL. AND IF MISS MINUS, OF COURSE, IS WILLING TO LOOK AT IT, YOU KNOW, WE SAY THINGS IN ANGER. A LOT OF TIMES I'VE EXPERIENCED THAT IN THE PAST, YOU KNOW, AND SO OFTENTIMES ANGER BRINGS US TO A POINT IN OUR LIVES THAT WE REGRET. SURE. OKAY. SO THAT'S THE ONLY THING I WANT TO SAY BESIDES CENSORSHIP AND AND EVERYTHING ELSE. AND I THANK YOU, DAVID, TO, TO BRING THIS DOWN, TO TAKE IT OFF THE BOILING. YEAH. YOU KNOW, AND DOWN TO A SIMMER. YEP. THAT'S MY RECOMMENDATION. THAT'S MY QUESTION. THAT'S WHAT I'D LIKE TO ASK OUT LOUD. AND THE LAST THING I'LL SAY, I'M SURE MISS MINUS WOULD WANT TO JUST PUT AN END TO THIS AND MOVE FORWARD AS WELL. YOU KNOW, SO I, I'M GOING TO SUPPORT THAT FOR THE FACT THAT THIS PUTS AN END TO IT, YOU KNOW. AND THE FACT IS, IS, YOU KNOW, SHE KEEPS HER BOARDS, SHE STAYS AND SHE CONTINUES TO SERVE THE CITY. AND AND I'M HOPING THAT WE CAN SIT DOWN, YOU KNOW, DURING AN EVENT OR SOMETHING, YOU KNOW, DURING THE HOLIDAYS OR SOMETHING AND, YOU KNOW, MAYBE BREAK BREAD WITH YOU AND HER AND ALL OF US AND, AND AND MOVE ON. BECAUSE I THINK WE HAVE TO FOCUS ON THE, THE BUSINESS OF THE CITY. SURE.GO AHEAD. MA'AM. OKAY. MR. NEWMAN BROUGHT UP THE POLICE REPORT, AND IT WENT UP TO THE STATE ATTORNEY'S. AND IN THE STATE ATTORNEY'S REPORT STATES IT'S NOT ENOUGH EVIDENCE TO PROSECUTE OR BRING FORWARD. I DON'T HAVE THE EXACT WORDING IN FRONT OF ME. MR. NEWMAN, I'M SORRY FOR YOU, BUT HE JUST SAID IT DOESN'T HAVE IT DIDN'T RISE TO THE OCCASION, AND I ADDRESSED THAT. NO. IT WASN'T. SO WHY ARE WE DOING THIS? WE'RE JUST PUNISHING SOMEBODY. JUST TO PUNISH SOMEBODY. JUST MOVE ON. LET'S JUST DROP IT. MOVE ON. NO CENSURE. JUST MOVE ON. IS IT APPROPRIATE TO SAY I'M GOING TO KILL YOU TO SOMEBODY IN ANY CASE? IN ANY CASE AT ALL? IF SOMEBODY IS JOKING, WE ALWAYS. IT WAS NOT A JOKE. OUR OWN POLICE CHIEF HAS HAD TO TELL HER. I'M UNCOMFORTABLE WITH HOW YOU TALK ABOUT DAVID NEWMAN IN PUBLIC. OKAY. WHO SAID THAT? OUR POLICE CHIEF. ALL RIGHT. OKAY, WE'RE GOING TO GO AHEAD AND MOVE FORWARD. SO WE'RE GOING TO WHAT WE'LL DO. WE'LL HAVE A AND AGAIN, I THINK WE CAN JUST MOVE FORWARD WITH THIS.
AND YOU KNOW, AGAIN, WHETHER IT'S A VERBAL CENSURE AND HOPE HOPEFULLY, YOU KNOW THIS PUTS AN END TO IT AND WE'LL CALL IT A NIGHT. AND AGAIN WE CONTINUE TO CONDUCT BUSINESS THE CITY OF MELBOURNE. SO WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY WHAT OR JUST A VERBAL CENSURE.
JUST WE DON'T YEAH I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S THE RIGHT WORD. WELL THAT'S WHAT AND I'M ONLY GETTING THAT FROM MR. CONNELLY AGAIN. RIGHT. AND THIS IS WHERE RIGHT. THE THE SPECIFIC THE SPECIFIC I HAVEN'T PROPOSED THE SPECIFIC LANGUAGE AS I, AS I UNDERSTAND THE VICE MAYOR'S MOTION, IT'S A VERBAL CENSURE TO REPRIMAND MISS MINUS FOR FOR AND THE CITY OF MELBOURNE SAYING WE DON'T APPROVE OF OF THIS ACTION AND WE REPRIMAND WE VERBALLY REPRIMAND MISS MINUS FOR FOR HAVING DONE IT. THAT'S THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING OF THE MOTION. SO MILITARY WE HAD A LETTER OF COUNSEL IN THE LETTER OF REPRIMAND. CENSURE EQUIVALENT TO ONE OF THOSE.
THERE'D BE NO LETTERS. THERE'S NO THERE'S NO CRAZY PROCESS. IT'S JUST THIS COUNCIL. RIGHT.
IT'S JUST A WE VERBALLY VERBAL, VERBAL, JUST VERBAL. NO LETTER IN HER FILE. NO NO LETTER IN FILE. IT WOULD EFFECTIVELY BE IN THE MINUTES OF THIS MEETING. WELL RIGHT. BUT THERE. RIGHT.
[00:30:01]
BUT THERE WOULD BE THE ALTERNATIVE THAT HE DISCUSSED WAS THAT THERE'D BE A RESOLUTION OR SOMETHING THAT WAS WRITTEN AND ALL THIS. AND I DON'T WANT TO GO THROUGH ALL THAT. IT IT MAKES THIS PROCESS LONGER. IT DRAGS THIS OUT. I JUST DON'T THINK, AGAIN, I'M TRYING TO FIND THAT MIDDLE GROUND, THAT OFF RAMP. SHE KEEPS THE BOARDS. WE'RE NOT GOING TO GO DO ANY THINGS THAT SEND IT UP OR SEND IT DOWN, BUT THEN ALSO IT AT LEAST ACKNOWLEDGES WHAT HAD OCCURRED AND THAT YOU CAN'T DO SOMETHING LIKE, WELL, WE END THIS. YEAH, RIGHT. IT'S OVER. OKAY. AND IF MR. MR. SMITH, IF YOU GOT A DIFFERENT WORD, YOU GOT LIKE TO BRING UP. I MEAN, I'M JUST SAYING YOU YOU AND I A VERBAL COUNSELING SOUNDS FINE TO ME, I DON'T KNOW. WELL, I WOULD, I WOULD ASSUME THIS MILITARY AS WELL THAT THIS IS BELOW THAT.OKAY. ALL RIGHT. WOULD YOU AGREE I MEAN SO VERBAL CENSURE. VERBAL CENSURE. CALL TODAY.
CALL IT A DAY. YEP. OKAY. WE HAVE WE HAVE A MOTION. THEN WE HAVE A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE AYE. ANY OPPOSED. NAY, NAY. DO A ROLL. I'M SORRY. DO A ROLL CALL.
COUNCILMEMBER. BASSETT. COUNCILMEMBER. HANLEY. NAY. COUNCILMEMBER. KENNEDY.
COUNCILMEMBER. SMITH. NAY. COUNCILMEMBER LARUSSO. VICE MAYOR. NEWMAN. HI. MAYOR ALFREY AND I VOTE AYE. AND THAT MOTION PASSES. THAT'S OVER WITH. OKAY. WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON TO
[A.7. Public Comments]
PUBLIC COMMENT. OKAY. WE HAVE A HANDFUL. REAL QUICK. I WANT TO PASS OUT TO OUR COUNCIL. AS YOU KNOW, I'M IN CIVIL LITIGATION RIGHT NOW WITH AND THERE'S MORE PENDING LITIGATION REGARDING A SPEAKER WHO'S A HATE, IN MY OPINION, A PAID AGITATOR I'M GOING TO SEND OUT. AND THIS IS PUBLIC RECORD. SO SO I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND SEND THIS DOWN, AND THAT'S JUST FOR YOUR COPY LATER. THANK YOU. MAYOR. WE HAVE ONE OF THOSE TWO THINGS. AND AGAIN THAT'S THAT THAT'S PUBLIC RECORD. MORE MORE THAN WELCOME TO SEE THAT. SO I'M GOING TO GO AHEAD AND AT THE ADVICE OF MY ATTORNEY I'M GOING TO STEP OUT OF THE ROOM AND GIVE THIS TO THE VICE MAYOR FOR PUBLIC COMMENT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. I HAVE A MR. MARK HOLSHUE FOLLOWED BY GERALD PARODY. GOOD EVENING, CITY COUNCIL. MARK HOLSHUE BORN AND RAISED IN MELBOURNE, FLORIDA, BACK BEFORE O'GALLEY BAILED OUT MELBOURNE. CITY COUNCIL. WE STILL HAVE A PROBLEM IN OUR CITY OF SPEEDERS AND SUCH, ESPECIALLY RIGHT HERE AT US ONE AT WAWA. THEY WILL COME OUT OF THE STORE THERE AND THEY JUST STEP ON THE GAS. NOBODY'S ENFORCING IT. I HAVE NOT SEEN ANY POLICE OFFICER PULL ANYBODY OVER IN THAT AREA. I HAVE A SURPLUS RADAR GUN. I STOOD UP AT THE OLD HOUSE AND POINTED TOWARDS THAT AREA AND CAUGHT SPEARS DOING WELL OVER 80 MILES AN HOUR JUST IN THAT SECTION, GOING NORTHBOUND ON US ONE. ALSO CITY COUNCIL. WE STILL HAVE PROBLEMS WITH E-BIKES. THEY'RE NOT RIDING THEM LIKE BICYCLES. THEY'RE NOT PEDALING. THEY'RE USING THEM JUST WHATEVER WAYS THEY MEANS TO DO TO HELP. AND THEY DON'T CARE ABOUT TRAFFIC LAWS.THEY'LL GO RIGHT ACROSS YOU IN STOP SIGNS, TRAFFIC LIGHTS, WHATEVER. SOMEBODY'S GOING TO GET HIT. WE NEED SOME SORT OF REGULATIONS. OTHER CITIES HAVE DONE REGULATIONS. AND WHAT I UNDERSTAND, THE LEGISLATURE HAS SOMETHING PROPOSED FOR NEXT MEETING. SO THAT'S ALL I HAVE.
I GOT MINT LEFT. I DO NOT DELEGATE THESE MINUTES TO NO ONE. THANK YOU, MR. HOELSCHER.
MR. GERALD PURDY, FOLLOWED BY STEVEN BORGMAN. GOOD EVENING. I'M COMING HERE AS A LAST RESORT IN FRONT OF MY HOUSE. SINCE 21 MONTHS. I HAVE A MANUAL FOR SEWAGE OPEN, WHICH CREATES A LOT OF PROBLEMS. IT'S A HAZARD, FIRST OF ALL, AND WE ALL KNOW THAT SARNO WROTE THIS COUNTY. THE PROBLEM IS THAT I WITNESSED THE FACT THAT THE VACUUM FROM MELBOURNE BROKE THAT BY ACCIDENT, BECAUSE THERE WAS SIX INCHES OF GRASS OVER IT, SO THEY SIMPLY RUN OVER IT, SEEING THE, THE, THE, THE LINES FOR THE SEWAGE. BUT NOT NOBODY KNOW THAT THERE WAS AN OLD SEWAGE LINE THERE. SO I HAVE FIVE MEETINGS WITH MELBOURNE AND THE COUNTY AT THE SAME TIME.
[00:35:01]
AND NEVER, NEVER HAS NEVER BEEN RESOLVED. I UNDERSTAND IT'S THE COUNTY, BUT THE COUNTY SAID THEY DIDN'T BROKE IT. YOU DID. SO ONE SOMEBODY ASKED TO HAVE A DECISION BECAUSE EVERY WEEK I HAVE 2 OR 3 RATS KILLED BY MY DOGS AND EVERYTHING. AND I DON'T THINK IT'S ADMISSIBLE. SO I TRIED TO GO SEE, LIKE I SAID, MANY MEETINGS WITH EVERYBODY AND IT'S NEVER GO ANYWHERE, ANYWHERE ELSE. SO WHEN YOU'RE SAYING MEETINGS, ARE YOU MET WITH STAFF ALREADY OR SOMETHING? OR. BECAUSE IF NOT, I WAS GOING TO GIVE NOT NOT THE ENGINEER BUT THE, THE RODENT PEOPLE AND THE WATER COLLECTION AND SEWAGE PEOPLE FROM MELBOURNE AND ALSO FROM THE COUNTY AT ON SITE.MMHM. AND EVERYBODY'S POINTING FINGERS. BUT IT'S AN ACCIDENT THAT MELBOURNE DID BECAUSE IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO KNOW THAT THERE WAS A MANHOLE. THERE WAS A LINE FOR THE SEWAGE LINE, BUT THERE WAS IMPOSSIBLE TO SEE THAT THERE WAS AN OLD MAN OVER THERE. OKAY. BECAUSE IF WE WERE ABLE TO GET YOUR INFORMATION TO THE CITY MANAGER AND HAVE HER, WOULD THAT BE OKAY WITH YOU? IF WE WERE ABLE TO HAVE YOU GIVE THAT AFTER 21 MONTHS? I KNOW, I UNDERSTAND. I'D LIKE A SOLUTION.
SIMPLE AS THAT. SURE. WELL, WELL, WELL, YOU'RE TRYING TO GET THE MANHOLE FIXED. THAT'S OBVIOUSLY THE SOLUTION YOU'RE LOOKING FOR. CORRECT? THE COVER. RIGHT, RIGHT. THE THE COVER OF THE MANHOLE. CORRECT? NO, IT'S THE ENTIRE. I KNOW THE ENTIRE MANHOLE IS CORRECT. YEAH. IT'S COMPLETELY SHIFTED AND EVERYTHING. IT'S A BIT A BIG TRUCK INSTEAD OF OLD MAN. SURE.
RIGHT. IS IT DON SARNO, YOU SAID. YEAH. IF YOU SEE ON SARNO WHERE I'M BUILDING THOSE HOUSE, THERE IS THREE CONES, AND THEY'RE THERE SINCE TWO YEARS. ALMOST. OH, YEAH. OKAY. AND THOSE ARE THE MAIN. BUT THE DISCUSSION IS IT'S NOT MINE, IT'S YOURS. BUT WHO BROKE IT? SO THIS NEEDS TO BE RESOLVED IN THE FORM OF I DIDN'T WANT TO COME HERE TO EXPLAIN THAT, BUT NO, THAT'S THE ONLY SUGGESTION THAT I HAVE. NO, I JUST WANT TO POINT ANOTHER THING. ALSO, THE ZONING DEPARTMENT AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. YOUR. THE STATUS OF THOSE AREA FOR CHANGING.
OKAY. IT'S DATED FROM 85 OR 82 OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT. IT'S 50 SOME YEARS OLD. I'VE PROPOSED TO BUILD A VICTORIAN QUEEN ANNE'S HOUSE ON PINEAPPLE. THE PROJECT OF 1.2 MILLION. I COULD NOT EVEN GET A VARIANT OR HAVE AN ADDITION OF THAT. SO I THINK THAT THERE IS A REVISION TO DO ON THE ZONING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT. OKAY. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU, MAYOR STEVE STEVEN BERGMAN, FOLLOWED BY PETER G. MY NAME IS STEVEN BORGMAN. I HAVE ALREADY SPOKEN TO THIS COUNCIL ABOUT HOW CHIEF DAVID GILLESPIE ILLEGALLY MODIFIED MY COMPLAINT BY CHANGING THE STATED VIOLATIONS OF LAW AND DEPARTMENT POLICY TO CONDUCT UNBECOMING, TO PREVENT AN INTERNAL AFFAIRS INVESTIGATION FOR WHICH THE FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF LAW ENFORCEMENT WOULD HAVE BEEN NOTIFIED. CHIEF GILLESPIE INTERFERED TWICE IN THE INVESTIGATION TO PROTECT HIS OFFICERS FROM ACCOUNTABILITY, INCLUDING PREVENTING INTERNAL AFFAIRS LIEUTENANT SHAW FROM LOOKING INTO THE MANY DISCREPANCIES IN THE FINAL REPORT. EVIDENCE WAS IGNORED BY BOTH SUPERVISOR GRINWIS AND HETAL DESAI FROM INTERNAL AFFAIRS. THE CHIEF SIGNED OFF ON THE OFFICIAL DISPOSITION, STATING THAT HE HAD REVIEWED ALL THE EVIDENCE AND FACTS WHICH HE HAD NOT. I WAS DENIED PUBLIC RECORDS TO INCLUDE VIDEO EVIDENCE THAT WOULD HAVE PROVEN CHIEF GILLESPIE'S FALSE CHARGE OF STALKING HIS SECRETARY, COLLEEN WARREN. THE VIDEO WAS THEN DESTROYED. GIVEN THE CRIMINAL TREATMENT BY THE DEPARTMENT, CHIEF GILLESPIE AND MAYOR ALFREY, I CHOSE TO EXPRESS MY DISGUST AGAINST THREE COPS WHO WERE ILLEGALLY TRESPASSING AND LOITERING IN A MARKED NO TRESPASSING AREA. WITH MY FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHT OF EXPRESSION, I HONK MY HORN AND GAVE HIM THE FINGER. IN RETALIATION, I WAS RUN DOWN, THREATENED WITH JAIL FOR RESISTING WITHOUT VIOLENCE, AND CHARGED WITH IMPROPER TURN AND ILLEGAL USE OF HORN. OFFICER COLVIN FIRST STATED THE REASON FOR THE STOP WAS SPEEDING AND THEN CHANGED IT TO ILLEGAL USE OF HORN. AFTER I PROTESTED, THE STOP WAS RETALIATION THAT SHOWS COLVIN LACKED PROBABLE CAUSE DUE TO HIS FAILURE TO ARTICULATE A CRIME REQUIRED BY LAW. JUST AS IN MY FIRST COMPLAINT, TAKISHA AGAIN REFUSED VARIOUS PUBLIC RECORDS, INCLUDING DASH CAMERA VIDEO FROM BOTH CARS, THUS VIOLATING STATE LAW AND POLICY. THOUGH SHE REFUSED PUBLIC RECORDS, SHE REPEATEDLY LIED AND GASLIGHTED ME ABOUT HOW SHE HAD ALREADY PROVIDED THE RECORDS AND WASN'T GOING TO RESCIND THEM. WHEN I SPOKE TO HETAL DESAI FROM INTERNAL AFFAIRS ABOUT TAKISHA ELLERY'S RECORDS VIOLATIONS, HE SAID I SHOULD MAKE A COMPLAINT OR GET A LAWYER. ELDERLY FLATLY DENIED MY RIGHT TO DISCOVERY PRIOR TO TRIAL, A RIGHT THAT CANNOT BE DENIED UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES.
DURING TRIAL, OFFICER COLVIN PERJURED HIMSELF THREE TIMES AND WAS ALLOWED TO TESTIFY ON DISCOVERY ITEMS, WHICH I WAS DENIED AND COULD NOT PREPARE A DEFENSE. JUDGE ATKINS REFUSED TO LET ME ASK QUESTIONS, PRESENT EVIDENCE, TESTIFY, NOR REBUT COLVIN'S TESTIMONY. JUDGE ATKINS REFUSED TO CONSIDER CIVIL RIGHTS VIOLATIONS ON, AND THE FACT THAT THE STOP WAS ILLEGALLY MADE IN RETALIATION TO SATISFY COLVIN'S EGO, JUDGE ATKINS GROSSLY STRETCHED THE WORDS OF THE LAW AND FABRICATED LAW TO FORCE A GUILTY VERDICT. I DID APPEAL MY CASE, BUT I WAS
[00:40:01]
PURPOSELY GIVEN INCORRECT INSTRUCTIONS ON HOW TO FILE THE APPEAL BY THE COURT CLERK. THE MELBOURNE CITY ATTORNEY THEN GOT IT KILLED, NOT BASED ON THE FACT OF OFFICER COLVIN'S PERJURY. FIRST AND FOURTH AMENDMENT RETALIATIONS, FALSIFIED CHARGES, THREATS, EVIDENCE TAMPERING, VIOLATIONS OF RECORDS LAW, AND DENIAL OF DISCOVERY, BUT ON THE GROUNDS OF IMPROPER LEGAL FORMATTING AND A LACK OF AN EXPENSIVE COURT TRANSCRIPT THAT HE ALREADY HAD ACCESS TO, THE CRIMES OF THE DEPARTMENT REMAIN HIDDEN BY THE EFFORTS OF THE CITY ATTORNEY ACTING ON BEHALF OF THE MELBOURNE POLICE DEPARTMENT UNDER THE LEADERSHIP OF CHIEF DAVID GILLESPIE. ONLY ONE QUESTION REMAINS WHAT IS THIS COUNCIL GOING TO DO ABOUT MAYOR ALFREY CHIEF GILLESPIE AND THE CORRUPT MELBOURNE POLICE DEPARTMENT? ALL RIGHT, NEXT UP IS PETER G. FOLLOWED BY GARY SULSKY. THAT'S NOT A RHETORICAL QUESTION, BY THE WAY.GOOD EVENING COUNCIL. MY NAME IS PETER. I LIVE ON HIGHLAND STREET. I'VE BEEN HERE SEVERAL TIMES BEFORE, JUST IN THE LAST MONTH. MY NEIGHBOR SAID SOMETHING TO SOMEBODY. THEY CAME BACK AND RETALIATED, YOU KNOW, AND HE HAD TO CALL THE POLICE. YOU KNOW, HE HAD KIDS IN THE YARD, AND I GUESS HE THOUGHT THEY WERE IN DANGER. AND SO HE SAID SOMETHING.
ANYWAYS, THE POLICE WERE THERE AT THE END OF LAST MONTH, AND THEN THE MAILBOX WAS TAKEN OUT ON 1401 HOLLAND STREET, 1448 ON HOLLAND STREET AND 1437 HOLLAND STREET IN THREE WEEKS, PEOPLE HAVE BEEN RUNNING OVER TO MAILBOXES AND SOMEBODY TOLD ME IT WAS A FEDERAL OFFENSE. I REACHED OUT AND THE POLICE SAID THAT THEY WOULD SEND A COUPLE GUYS, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, TO PATROL PERIODICALLY. AND I'M JUST HOPING THAT ME BEING HERE CAN DRAW MORE ATTENTION TO THE PROBLEM BEFORE, YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW, THERE'S THERE'S REALLY SOMEBODY REALLY HURT TWO HOUSES DOWN OR A DISABLED VETS AND THEY WON'T EVEN WALK OUT ON THE STREET WITH THEIR WALKERS. AND WE DON'T HAVE A SIDEWALK IN THAT NEIGHBORHOOD WHERE I'M AT. SO, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE OUT IN THE STREET. THAT'S ABOUT IT. ANY, ANY WAY YOU PEOPLE COULD HELP ME, I CERTAINLY WOULD APPRECIATE IT. I'M SURE THE GOOD PEOPLE ON HOLLAND STREET WOULD APPRECIATE YOUR HELP, TOO.
SURE. THANK YOU SO MUCH. THE CITY MANAGER'S HEARD IT. CHIEF OF POLICE IS BACK THERE. HEARD IT. SO THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. GARY SULSKY FOLLOWED BY. RACHEL ROCHELLE JOLLEY. THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK. I'VE KNOWN YVONNE FOR YEARS, NOT JUST AS A MELBOURNE GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL, BUT AS A TRUE FRIEND AND A QUIET FORCE DEVOTED TO OUR COMMUNITY. AT A TIME WHEN POLITICS OFTEN FEELS LOUD AND DIVISIVE, YVONNE IS ONE WHO ROLLS UP HER SLEEVES AND GETS TO WORK. SHE BRINGS PEOPLE TOGETHER WITHOUT NEEDING CREDIT OR APPLAUSE. YVONNE HAS A CROSS PARTY LINES AGAIN AND AGAIN, PROVING THAT MEANINGFUL SOLUTIONS DON'T BELONG TO ANY ONE POLITICAL LABEL. YVONNE HAS SPENT HER YEARS ON COUNCIL BUILDING REAL COALITIONS AROUND SHARED VALUES. SHE HAS DELIVERED RESULTS BY WORKING CLOSELY WITH ALL OF HER COLLEAGUES, CRAFTING POLICIES THAT MAKE MELBOURNE FAIRER, MORE STABLE AND MORE COMPASSIONATE. ONE OF THE CLEAREST EXAMPLES CAME IN 2017, WHEN SHE PUSHED FORWARD A RESOLUTION CREATING AFFORDABLE HOUSING INCENTIVES. THE GOAL WAS SIMPLE AND DEEPLY NEEDED UNLOCK TAX CREDITS FOR DEVELOPERS BUILDING LOW INCOME HOUSING. THIS GAVE FAMILIES WHO WERE ONE PAYCHECK AWAY FROM CRISIS A CHANCE FOR STABILITY.
THE COUNCIL PASSED UNANIMOUSLY, INCLUDING SUPPORT FROM MAYOR ALFREY. IT WAS BIPARTISAN PARTNERSHIP AT ITS BEST, EVERYONE STEPPING UP TO ENSURE THAT HOME OWNERSHIP AND SAFE HOUSING WEREN'T OUT OF REACH. HER EFFORTS AREN'T FLASHY PHOTO OPS. THEY'RE CAREFULLY BUILT SYSTEMS THAT CATCH PEOPLE BEFORE THEY FALL THROUGH THE CRACKS. WHETHER SHE'S HELPING HURRICANE VICTIMS NAVIGATE RENTAL RELIEF OR PUSHING FOR MENTAL HEALTH HOTLINES AND SCHOOLS, YVONNE'S WORK IS GROUNDED IN THE BELIEF THAT NO ONE IN MELBOURNE SHOULD BE LEFT BEHIND. AT A TIME. SHE'S BROUGHT HER COLLEAGUES WITH HER FINDING COMMON GROUND WHERE OTHERS MIGHT EXPECT DIVISION. ONE OF THE THINGS I ADMIRE MOST IS HOW SHE LOOKS OUT FOR EVERYONE. SHE FIGHTS FOR THE SINGLE MOM WORKING TWO JOBS, BUT SHE ALSO UNDERSTANDS THE
[00:45:01]
IMPORTANCE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. SHE'S SUPPORTED EFFORTS TO STREAMLINE PERMITTING FOR DEVELOPERS, BRINGING TECH JOBS TO THE SPACE COAST, EFFORTS THAT HAVE EARNED SUPPORT FROM THE MAYOR AND OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS. SHE CHAMPIONS GROWTH, EQUITY AND EQUAL MEASURE, ALWAYS SEARCHING FOR BALANCE SO PROSPERITY REACHES EVERY CORNER OF THE COMMUNITY. TO ME, YVONNE ISN'T JUST A GOVERNMENT OFFICIAL, SHE'S THE FRIEND WHO REMINDS US WHAT SERVANT LEADERSHIP LOOKS LIKE. SHE LEADS WITH HUMILITY, COMPASSION, AND A DEEP SENSE OF RESPONSIBILITY TO THE PEOPLE OF MELBOURNE. OUR CITY IS BETTER BECAUSE OF HER WORK, AND I'M BETTER FOR HAVING HER IN MY LIFE. I WANT TO THANK YVONNE FOR LEADING WITH HER HEART.MELBOURNE'S FUTURE IS BRIGHTER BECAUSE OF YOU. MAYOR AND CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS. YVONNE IS A GOOD PERSON. LET'S NOT FORGET THAT. THANK YOU. MISS JOLLY, FOLLOWED BY KENDRA THOMPSON. HI.
THANK YOU FOR LETTING ME SPEAK TONIGHT. MY NAME IS ROCHELLE JOLLY. I DON'T LIVE IN THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BUT I AM A BREVARD COUNTY RESIDENT AND HAVE BEEN OVER FOR OVER 20 YEARS. I'D LIKE TO SPEAK TO THE ACCUSATIONS FROM THE CITY COUNCIL MEMBER FROM THE VICE MAYOR CONCERNING A CLOSE FRIEND OF MINE, YVONNE MANUS. I'D LIKE TO ADD MY THOUGHTS TO MR. SOLSKI. IN A WORLD WHERE EVERYTHING'S VERY DIVISIVE AND VITRIOL IS VERY COMMON, I WOULD LIKE TO SPEAK TO WHAT WE CAN DO TO CONTROL THAT HERE IN BREVARD COUNTY THROUGH OUR POLITICS.
I'D LIKE TO VERBALLY ACKNOWLEDGE THAT MRS. MANUS HAS BEEN A MENTOR TO ME, AS I'VE VOLUNTEERED FOR MANY ORGANIZATIONS HERE IN BREVARD COUNTY THAT SUPPORT THE HUNGRY, EDUCATING CHILDREN, AND PREVENTING GUN VIOLENCE. SHE'S GUIDED ME AND COUNSELED ME TO ALWAYS SEEK THE LORD AS I AM SERVING, AND TO FOLLOW MY HEART. SHE'S A SISTER TO ME IN CHRIST AND SHE WOULD NEVER HARM ANYONE. THE FACT THAT THESE ALLEGATIONS WERE HURLED TOWARD HER SAYS A LOT MORE ABOUT THE EGOTISTICAL AND NARCISSISTIC CHARACTER OF THE PERSON WHO MADE THEM, THAN IT DOES ABOUT HER. PEOPLE THINK THEY'RE VERY IMPORTANT. YVONNE HAS A SERVANT'S HEART AND HAS SPENT HER LIFE SUPPORTING THOSE IN NEED, AND THE FACT THAT YOU HAVE VERBALLY CENSURED HER IS COMPLETELY INAPPROPRIATE AND UNFAIR. THANK YOU. KENDRA THOMPSON, FOLLOWED BY RAY SHACKELFORD. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS KENDRA THOMPSON. I'M A RESIDENT WHO BELIEVES IN FAIRNESS, DUE PROCESS AND ACCURACY. BEFORE I BEGIN, I'D LIKE TO ASK FOR A MOMENT OF SILENCE FOR ALL OF THOSE WHO'VE LOST THEIR LIVES TO GUN VIOLENCE. MY HEART IS WITH EVERY FAMILY. THANK YOU. I WANT TO START BY SAYING THIS EVERYONE DESERVES TO FEEL SAFE.
IF THE VICE MAYOR FELT UNCOMFORTABLE OR THREATENED IN ANY WAY, THAT FEELING IS VALID AND DESERVES ACKNOWLEDGMENT. AND I APPRECIATE THE VICE MAYOR'S WILLINGNESS TO MOVE FORWARD TONIGHT. BUT FAIRNESS ALSO REQUIRES FULL CONTEXT. AND FORMER VICE MAYOR OF OMINOUS IS A WOMAN WHO HAS SERVED THIS CITY FOR DECADES WITH COMMITMENT, COMPASSION AND LEADERSHIP. I WAS PRESENT AT THE SEPTEMBER 24TH COUNCIL MEETING BECAUSE IT WAS A RECESS.
PEOPLE WERE STANDING, TALKING AND MOVING AROUND AND THE ROOM WAS TRANSITIONING. I DID NOT HEAR ANY OF THE ALLEGED REMARKS DIRECTLY. WHAT I DO KNOW IS THIS THE PEOPLE OF MELBOURNE DESERVE A PROCESS THAT IS ROOTED IN TRUTH, CONSISTENCY, RESPECT, AND NOT CONFUSION OR DIVISION. AND AS A RESIDENT, WE EXPECT OUR LEADERS TO UPHOLD THAT STANDARD FOR EVERYONE IN EVERY SITUATION. THANK YOU. DOCTOR RAY SHACKELFORD, FOLLOWED BY LONG ISLAND AUDIT DOCTOR RAY SHACKELFORD. FIRST, I'D LIKE TO ASK, NUMBER ONE, WILL THERE BE A PUBLIC HEARING FOR THE COMPLAINTS RELATED TO THE MAYOR? O THE CITY ATTORNEY SAID THERE WOULDN'T BE. THAT'S THERE WOULD NOT BE. THERE COULDN'T BE FOR THE MAYOR. NOW FOR THE MAYOR. OH, NO. THERE'S NO PUBLIC HEARING TAKING PLACE AT THIS TIME. NO. OKAY, OKAY. SECONDLY, HOW MANY OF YOU BELIEVE THAT DWI ARE THREATS TO OUR COMMUNITY DRINKING UNDER THE INFLUENCE OF ALCOHOL? I'M NOT GONNA DO A QUESTION. ANSWER IF YOU'D LIKE, THOUGH, TO TO CONTINUE WITH YOUR SPEECH. HOW MANY OF YOU BELIEVE THAT TELLING THE CITIZENS TO MEET YOU OUTSIDE, IF HE DISAGREES
[00:50:03]
WITH YOU, IS NOT A THREAT TO THE CITIZEN? HOW MANY OF YOU BELIEVE THAT SUPPORTING THE PERSON WHO EMBRACES RACISM, HATRED, AND VIOLENCE IS NOT A THREAT TO OUR COMMUNITY? IN BRIEF, THREATS RACISM, HATRED AND VIOLENCE ARE NOT IN THE BEST INTEREST OF OUR COMMUNITY.LET US EMBRACE PEACE, RESPECT, FORGIVENESS, TRANSPARENCY, LOVE, UNITY AND HAPPINESS WITH JUSTICE FOR ALL. REMEMBER THE BIBLE IF A PERSON SAYS HE LOVED GOD AND HATES HIS FRIEND, HE'S HIS FRIEND. HE'S A LIAR. SO I SAY TO ALL OF YOU, MISS MILES IS NOW MISS MILES FOREVER.
THANK YOU. LONG ISLAND AUDIT FOLLOWED BY. GODWIN DANIELS OR GODWIN DANIELS. GOOD EVENING.
I'M THINKING ABOUT GETTING A RENTAL PROPERTY OUT HERE IN AIRBNB. I THINK I, YOU KNOW, SAVED ME A LOT IN AIRFARE. I'VE BEEN TO MORE COUNCIL MEETINGS IN THIS LAST MONTH THAN THE MAYOR AND THE MAYOR, WHO IS ONE OF THE BIGGEST COWARDS I'VE EVER MET IN MY ENTIRE LIFE, LEFT AGAIN. IF HE WANTS TO LEAVE BECAUSE THE PAID AGITATOR IS SPEAKING, THAT'S FINE. BUT HE SHOULD LISTEN TO THE REST OF THE MELBOURNE RESIDENTS. I'M NOT A PAID AGITATOR. THAT'S WHY, HE SAID. IN HIS OPINION, HE'S LEARNED NOT TO DEFAME PEOPLE BECAUSE, LIKE YOU SAY, YOU GOT DEATH THREATS. VICE MAYOR, HE SAID THAT I SENT HIM DEATH THREATS ON HIS SOCIAL MEDIA ACCOUNT, ON HIS FACEBOOK PAGE, AND I'M CURRENTLY SUING HIM FOR DEFAMATION. THAT'S THE LITIGATION HE'S TALKING ABOUT. BUT I THINK IT'S A LITTLE RIDICULOUS THAT YOU GUYS SPENT 30 MINUTES, 30 MINUTES TALKING ABOUT, OH, SOMETHING A HE SAID SHE SAID, I DON'T KNOW IF I BELIEVE YOU, VICE MAYOR, I DON'T KNOW. IT'S A HE SAID SHE SAID SHE SAYS THAT SHE WAS JOKING. SHE SAYS SHE WAS JOKING. WHATEVER. BUT YOU SPENT 30 MINUTES, ALL OF YOU, INTENTLY LISTENING, DEBATING AND TALKING, BUT YOU CAN'T TALK ABOUT ANYTHING THAT I BROUGHT UP THAT I'VE UNCOVERED. THE MAYOR VOTED ON A RESOLUTION AND SIGNED A RESOLUTION. THIS IS NOT A LEGEND. THIS IS FACTS. I HAVE PRESENTED YOU WITH THE DOCUMENTS THAT GAVE $500,000 OF FEDERAL MONEY TO SPACE COAST, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, SPACE COAST, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY, THEN WENT AND GAVE THE MAYOR THROUGH HIS ROOFING COMPANY, ALFRED ROOFING, ALMOST $10,000, AND SPACE COAST HABITAT FOR HUMANITY HAS GIVEN THE MAYOR OVER $50,000 IN TOTAL. THAT I CAN VERIFY. NOT OF THE FEDERAL MONEY, BUT IN GENERAL. WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO WHEN ARE YOU GOING TO ACTUALLY ACKNOWLEDGE WHAT'S GOING ON HERE AND TALK ABOUT IT? YOU KNOW, I FEEL, YOU KNOW, AGAIN, YOU GETTING DEATH THREATS OR WHATEVER. SHE SAID SHE WAS GOING TO KILL YOU.
WHATEVER HE SAID, SHE SAID IRRELEVANT. THE POINT IS, IS THAT YOU GUYS, THAT'S YOUR MAYOR AND NONE OF YOU WANT TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT IT. THERE'S NO MOTIONS TO CENSURE THE MAYOR, RIGHT? YOU DON'T WANT TO. YOU WANT TO CENSURE THIS WOMAN, BUT YOU DON'T WANT TO CENSURE THE MAYOR. YOU DON'T WANT TO INVESTIGATE IT. THE MELBOURNE PD IS NOT DOING ANYTHING. YOU JUST WANT TO IGNORE IT AND ACT LIKE IT'S NOT HAPPENING. IT'S RIDICULOUS. AND FOR THE MAYOR TO CONTINUALLY, CONTINUALLY RUN AWAY FROM THESE ALLEGATIONS, WHY ISN'T THE MAYOR HERE ADDRESSING THEM, SAYING HE'S LYING, BUT HE CAN CALL ME A PAID AGITATOR WHEN I HAVE EVIDENCE OF HIS CORRUPTION. HE HAS USED THE MELBOURNE POLICE DEPARTMENT TO INTIMIDATE HIS BROTHER'S WIDOW AND HIS DAUGHTER. HE HAS HE HAS DONE THINGS THAT HAVE BEEN CORRUPT AND THAT HE'S TAKEN MONEY FROM THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT. AND NONE OF YOU, THE CITY MANAGER, NONE OF YOU THE CITY ATTORNEY, NONE OF YOU GUYS WANT TO SPEAK UP ABOUT IT AND DO ANYTHING ABOUT IT. WHY DON'T WE HAVE A LITTLE POWWOW AND TALK ABOUT THAT? LET'S LET'S ALL DEBATE.
AND WHAT IF THE MAYOR IS CORRUPT OR NOT? I MEAN, WOULD YOU VOTE ON SOMETHING? AND THEN LARRY JONES, YOU'RE A FRIEND WITH HIM. I'M INVESTIGATING IT. SO YOU'RE GOING TO FIND OUT SOON ENOUGH. BUT LARRY JONES, THE BUILDING DEVELOPER, HOW MANY GRANTS HAVE YOU GUYS GIVEN HIM? HAS MAYOR ABSTAINED FROM THAT, TOO? HAVE YOU ABSTAINED FROM THOSE VOTES? YOUR BEST.
YOUR GOOD FRIENDS WITH HIM, AREN'T YOU? YOU GUYS GOT TO DO BETTER. START FIGHTING FOR FOR YOUR JUSTICE FOR THE PEOPLE OF MELBOURNE AND FOR THE PEOPLE OF AMERICA. THANK YOU. BALDWIN DANIELS FOLLOWED BY BONNIE. IDA. GREAT. THANK YOU. GOOD EVENING. THANK YOU FOR THIS PRIVILEGE.
MY NAME IS GODWIN DANIELS. I'M A LIFELONG RESIDENT OF MELBOURNE, FLORIDA, AND I ROSE TO JUST SPEAK BRIEFLY. ON FOR YVONNE MINUS FOR HER SUPPORT. I APPRECIATE ALL THE THE EARLIER COMMENTS ON HER BEHALF THAT'S GONE FORTH. A LOT OF WHAT WAS SAID IS WHAT I WAS GOING TO SAY.
[00:55:06]
SO I WON'T BE LABOR. THE TIME OF REITERATING THAT, BUT. JUST FOR MYSELF, I KNOW YVONNE PERSONALLY. I ALSO KNOW HER AS A TIRELESS SERVANT FOR THIS COMMUNITY, FOR THE CITY SHE HAS.I DON'T KNOW ANYBODY WHO HAS THAT KIND OF ENERGY THE WAY THAT SHE DOES A LOVE FOR HER COMMUNITY. AS SOMEONE SAID BEFORE, SHE SERVED ON THIS COUNCIL, SHE CONTINUES TO SERVE IN THE FOR THE NORTH MELBOURNE AS WELL AS THE SOUTH MELBOURNE. NEIGHBORHOOD FORMS. I GUESS YOU WOULD SAY. I CAN'T REMEMBER THE EXACT TITLE, BUT NEVERTHELESS. I JUST DON'T BELIEVE THAT YVONNE WOULD HAVE SAID WHAT YOU CLAIM. SHE SAID. I'M SO SORRY, BUT THAT'S NOT THE PERSON THAT I KNOW AND THAT'S NOT SOMETHING THAT SHE WOULD WOULD SAY. AND I'M JUST SO SORRY THAT SHE HAS BEEN CENSURED THIS WAY. I AM HAVE A LITTLE BIT OF. A LITTLE BIT OF PEACE THAT SHE IS ABLE TO KEEP HER HER BOARDS. BUT THIS TO BE UNCEREMONIOUSLY TREATED THIS WAY. AND IT'S NOT HELPING ANYTHING, QUITE FRANKLY, I YOU, SIR, I DON'T KNOW YOUR NAME, BUT YOU SAID THAT IF SHE WOULD GIVE AN APOLOGY. WELL, I THINK THE SAME SHOULD BE SAID ON THE OTHER SIDE. I THINK YOU SHOULD APOLOGIZE FOR HER. TO HER, IT SHOULDN'T BE ONE PERSON. IT SHOULD BE. IF WE'RE GOING TO MOVE ON. I THINK BOTH NEED TO COME TOGETHER IN THE MIDDLE AND YOU SHOULD APOLOGIZE AS WELL.
SO THAT'S MY $0.02. AND THANK YOU. THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR LISTENING TO ME. I'VE GOT 11 SECONDS. SO THANKS AGAIN. BONNIE. IDA FOLLOWED BY. I DON'T KNOW IF THERE'S A. OH, BISHOP JACKIE GORDON. HI. YOU HAVE TO EXCUSE ME. I'M A LITTLE UNDER THE WEATHER, BUT THIS IS A VERY IMPORTANT ISSUE, AND I THINK YVONNE WOULD CARE ABOUT IT, TOO. YOU PROBABLY KNOW ABOUT THE YOUNG MAN. YOUNG BOY WHO, AT 15, WAS ARRESTED IN THE WEST BANK AND IS IN AN ISRAELI JAIL, A VERY NOTORIOUS JAIL WHERE HE IS SUFFERING LOSING WEIGHT. IT HAPPENED IN FEBRUARY.
HERE IT IS. AND AMERICAN CITIZEN STILL IN JAIL. OFER PRISON IN ISRAEL. I WOULD LIKE TO YOU TO LET ME HAND YOU EACH A LEAFLET WITH INFORMATION ABOUT IT. THIS LEAFLET WAS CREATED BY A CHURCH GROUP THAT WANTED TO MAKE AN INITIATIVE ABOUT GETTING SOMETHING DONE. I SEE IT A LOT ON ACTUALLY ON NATIONAL NEWS, BUT VERY LITTLE HERE LOCALLY. AND IT WOULD BE A WONDERFUL THING FOR OUR CITY COUNCIL TO ACTUALLY TAKE A STAND AND SPEAK OUT FOR HIM.
AND THIS IS WHAT THE CHURCH PEOPLE SAID. THERE'S AN EMPTY SEAT AT THE TABLE THIS THANKSGIVING. BRING THIS FLORIDA TEENAGER HOME TO HIS FAMILY. IMAGINE THAT WHILE VISITING ANOTHER COUNTRY, YOUR CHILD IS DRAGGED FROM HIS BED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT BY A GROUP OF ARMED SOLDIERS AND TAKEN WITHOUT YOU OR ANOTHER ADULT, TO A MILITARY PRISON.
THAT WAS IN FEBRUARY. THEY HAVEN'T SEEN HIM ONCE. NO CONTACT. IMAGINE THAT HIS TRIAL ON SUSPICION OF STONE THROWING IS REPEATEDLY POSTPONED, AND YOU LEARN HE CAN BE HELD INDEFINITELY WITHOUT BEING FORMALLY CHARGED OR ALLOWED TO DEFEND HIMSELF. YOU ARE NOT ALLOWED TO SEE HIM FOR NINE MONTHS NOW, WHILE HE SUFFERS EXTREME MALNUTRITION AND A PAINFUL SKIN DISEASE, IMAGINE THAT HE SPENDS HIS 16TH BIRTHDAY IN A SMALL, OVERCROWDED PRISON CELL. INSTEAD OF GETTING HIS FLORIDA DRIVER'S LICENSE AND CELEBRATING WITH FRIENDS AND FAMILY. AND HERE ARE PICTURES FOR THE IBRAHIM FAMILY OF BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA. THERE IS NO NEED TO IMAGINE THEIR SON, MUHAMMAD HAS BEEN IN A NOTORIOUS ISRAELI PRISON SINCE FEBRUARY. ANOTHER TEENAGER HELD THERE DIED RECENTLY OF MALNUTRITION. THEIR SON HAS LOST A THIRD OF HIS BODY WEIGHT AND CONTRACTED SCABIES. STATE DEPARTMENT OFFICIALS HAVE CONFIRMED HIS DETERIORATING HEALTH. YET MANY FLORIDIANS ARE UNAWARE OF HIS PLIGHT. ISRAEL'S HOLDING OVER 300 CHILDREN IN MILITARY PRISONS, MANY WITHOUT
[01:00:07]
CHARGES. AND THIS GIVES YOU A WEBSITE TO CONTACT. BUT I HOPE THAT OUR OUR COUNCIL WILL SPEAK OUT TOGETHER ON HIS BEHALF AND GET THIS BOY HOME. THANK YOU. IF YOU HAVE FLIERS THAT YOU SAID YOU WANT TO GIVE, YOU COULD GIVE IT TO HER RIGHT THERE OR THE ONE FLIER. I DON'T KNOW WHAT YOU'RE HANDING OUT, BUT THEY'LL BE ABLE TO DISTRIBUTE IT TO US. THANK YOU.BISHOP JACKIE GORDON, FOLLOWED BY JAMES MINUS. GOOD EVENING. MY NAME IS BISHOP JACQUELINE GORDON. I AM THE SENIOR PASTOR OF NEW SHILOH CHRISTIAN CENTER LOCATED HERE IN MELBOURNE, AND I AM A RESIDENT OF MELBOURNE AS WELL. EVERYBODY DESERVES ANOTHER CHANCE. LADIES AND GENTLEMEN, FRIENDS AND FELLOW CITIZENS IN BASKETBALL. EVEN THE GREATEST PLAYERS, CHAMPIONS, MVPS, LEGENDS MAKE MISTAKES. THEY GET FRUSTRATED. THEY MAKE THE WRONG CALL, THEY REACT TOO QUICKLY. AND YES, SOMETIMES THEY GET TECHNICAL FOULS. BUT HERE'S WHAT'S POWERFUL ABOUT THE NBA. A TECHNICAL FOUL DOES NOT END THE GAME. IT DOES NOT ERASE THE PLAYER'S POTENTIAL.
IT DOES NOT CANCEL THEIR CONTRIBUTION TO THE TEAM. IT SIMPLY SIMPLY SENDS A MESSAGE RESET, REFOCUS, REGAIN CONTROL AND GET BACK IN THE GAME. AND WHEN THAT PLAYER STEPS BACK ONTO THE COURT, SOMETHING AMAZING HAPPENS. THEY PLAY SMARTER. THEY LEAD STRONGER.
THEY FIGHT HARDER BECAUSE THEY KNOW WHAT'S AT STAKE. I STAND BEFORE YOU TONIGHT TO TELL YOU THAT EVERY LEADER, INCLUDING YVONNE MENAS WE COME LIFTING UP TONIGHT, DESERVES THAT SAME OPPORTUNITY. WE EXPECT OUR LEADERS TO BE STRONG, BUT FORGET THAT THEY ARE HUMAN. WE WANT THEM TO BE WISE. BUT FORGET THAT WISDOM IS SHAPED THROUGH EXPERIENCES, CHALLENGES, AND YES, EVEN SETBACKS. THE POLITICAL LEADERS WE ARE HONORING TONIGHT HAS HAD A TECHNICAL FOUL. NOT A DISQUALIFICATION, NOT A MORAL FAILURE, NOT AN ENDING, JUST A MOMENT THAT REQUIRED A WHISTLE, A PAUSE AND A REEVALUATION. BUT LOOK AT WHAT YVONNE HAS DONE FOR OUR COMMUNITY. I BELIEVE EVEN FROM THIS, SHE'S LEARNED, SHE'S LISTENED, AND SHE HAS EVOLVED. SHE HAS EVOLVED. SHE'S BECOME MORE COMMITTED TO SERVING THE PEOPLE. THAT'S WHAT REAL LEADERSHIP LOOKS LIKE. NOT PERFECTION, BUT GROWTH. IN THE NBA. A TECHNICAL FOUL CAN ACTUALLY MAKE A PLAY AND ACTUALLY MAKE A PLAYER UP. IT REMINDS US THAT THE TEAM IS COUNTING ON THEM. IT MOTIVATES THEM TO CHANNEL THEIR PASSION, NOT THEIR FRUSTRATION. AND OFTEN AT THE AFTER A TECHNICAL, THAT SAME PLAYER BECOMES THE ONE WHO HITS THE BIG SHOT, WHO MAKES THE CRUCIAL ASSISTANT, THE ASSISTANT WHO LEADS THE COMEBACK. LIKEWISE, OUR LEADER YVONNE IS READY FOR A COMEBACK MOMENT. NOT BECAUSE SHE'S FLAWLESS, NOT BECAUSE SHE REFUSED TO STAY DOWN WHEN WHEN SEEN, BUT WHEN WE'VE SEEN POLITICIANS CRUMBLE, CHALLENGES CHALLENGED, WE'VE SEEN LEADERS RUN CRITICIZED. BUT WHAT WE HAVE HERE IS SOMEONE WHO TAKES RESPONSIBILITY AND GET BETTER. AND THAT IS THE KIND OF LEADER YVONNE IS WHO CAN MOVE A CITY, A COUNTY OR STATE AND A NATION. WE CAN'T TALK ABOUT SECOND CHANCES AND THEN REFUSE TO GIVE YVONNE ONE. WE CAN'T SAY WE BELIEVE IN GROWTH AND THEN PUNISH PEOPLE FOR GROWING. WE CAN'T PREACH PROGRESS AND THEN DENY THE VERY THING THAT MAKE PROGRESS POSSIBLE. REDEMPTION AND RESTORATION AND RENEWAL. TONIGHT WE NEED TO GIVE YVONNE A SECOND CHANCE. AND THAT'S OUR FINAL SPEAKER. MR. MYERS. HERE HE IS. OKAY. I'M SORRY I DIDN'T HEAR YOU CALL MY NAME. IT'S JUST HARD TO SIT BACK AND JUST. HEAR THE MINUS NAME BEING DRAGGED THROUGH THE MUD. AND MORE THAN THAT, HEARING MY WIFE'S NAME DRAGGED THROUGH THE MUD. AND IT IS BEING DRAGGED THROUGH THE MUD BECAUSE MY WIFE WOULDN'T HURT A FLY. AND TO ME. IT'S HARD TO BELIEVE THAT A MAN WOULD HAVE SUCH ANGER IN THINKING THAT A 74 YEAR OLD WOMAN WOULD DO ANYTHING TO HIM, SUCH AS DO HIM BODILY HARM. IF IT WAS ME AND IT'S NOT ME, I WOULD HAVE HAD THE NERVE OR THE
[01:05:09]
GALL OR WHATEVER TO CONFRONT THAT PERSON. ASK THAT PERSON, IS THAT REALLY WHAT YOU MEANT? WHAT I SAID? BUT NO, HE COMES UP WITH A WHOLE MEETING ABOUT THE INCIDENT. AFTER ALL THE WORK THAT I'VE SEEN HER DO, I'VE SEEN HER GET UP OUT OF OUR BED AT 2:00 IN THE MORNING AND GO AND TRY TO SOLVE CASES FROM PEOPLE CALLING HER UPSET ABOUT THIS, THAT AND THE OTHER. I'VE TRIED TO CALL THIS CITY COUNCIL MEMBER AND HE HASN'T EVEN RETURNED MY CALL YET CONCERNING ISSUES IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD. SHE LOVED THIS COMMUNITY. SHE LOVED MELBOURNE. SHE'D DO ANYTHING FOR MELBOURNE. SHE WOULDN'T HURT A FLY. SO I DON'T KNOW WHY THESE ACCUSATIONS ARE THERE OR WHY HE THINKS THAT SOMEBODY WOULD WANT TO HURT HIM. OR. AND I KNOW THAT THE I KNOW THAT THE.OUR GOVERNMENT SYSTEM IS IS GOING THROUGH SOME THINGS RIGHT NOW, BUT THERE'S NO HARM WILL COME TO YOU. NONE WHATSOEVER. I THINK THAT YOU SHOULD HAVE REACHED OUT AND ASKED HER, WAS THAT WHAT SHE REALLY MEANT? BECAUSE I'M SURE THAT'S NOT WHAT SHE MEANT, WHAT YOU HEARD.
BUT I WANT TO THANK COUNCILMEMBER FOR COUNCILMEMBER FOR FOR THE LENIENCY, I GUESS, IF THAT'S WHAT YOU WANT TO CALL IT. YOU'VE SHOWN MY WIFE AND I HOPE THIS IS THE LAST STRAW AND IT HURT ME SO BAD. LAST MEETING TO TO HEAR A WHOLE MEETING, A WHOLE MEETING, OUR TAXPAYERS MONEY, PAYING YOU ALL THIS MONEY, NOT ALL THIS MONEY, BUT THEY'RE PAYING FOR THIS. AND WE SPENT ALL THAT TIME ON THAT ISSUE WHEN THERE ARE OTHER ISSUES IN THE COMMUNITY THAT NEEDS TO BE SOLVED. I DON'T DRINK, I JUST I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S FAIR TO US AS CITIZENS. THERE ARE OTHER THINGS YOU COULD HAVE BEEN TALKING ABOUT, OTHER THINGS YOU COULD HAVE BEEN DOING. THE YOUNG LADY JUST GOT UP TALKING ABOUT A SEWER. THOSE KIND OF THINGS SHOULD HAVE BEEN DEALING WITH. COME TO YOUR COMMUNITY AND SEE WHAT'S GOING ON IN YOUR COMMUNITY. DON'T DON'T DON'T DON'T, DON'T. I'M I BETTER STOP BECAUSE MY MY BLOOD IS RUNNING HIGH. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. THAT CONCLUDES PUBLIC COMMENTS. MOVING ON TO
[B.8. Ordinance No. 2025-51: (Second Reading/Public Hearing) An ordinance amending Chapter 52 of the City Code, entitled "Streets, Sidewalks and Other Public Places"; amending Section 52-6, "Procedure to initiate street, facility or park name changes; application fee"; providing for revised procedures for street renaming and adding procedure for honorary street naming. (Applicant - Melbourne City Council)]
UNFINISHED BUSINESS ITEM EIGHT. ADAM. THANK YOU, VICE MAYOR. THIS IS ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2551, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING CHAPTER 52 OF THE CITY CODE ENTITLED STREETS, SIDEWALKS, AND OTHER PUBLIC PLACES. AMENDING SECTION.SECTION 52 SIX PROCEDURE TO INITIATE STREET FACILITY OR PARK NAME CHANGES. APPLICATION FEE TO PROVIDE FOR AN HONORARY STREET NAMING PROCEDURE. MAKING FINDINGS. PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND INTERPRETATION, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE.
ALL RIGHT. MR. GOOD EVENING, VICE MAYOR COUNCIL, THIS IS THE SECOND READING OF THIS ITEM, THE ONLY. OKAY. WHY DON'T WE GO GET ALFRED, THE MAYOR? WELL, I MEAN, HE'LL COME BACK WHEN HE'S GOING TO COME BACK. THEY THEY KNOW BECAUSE HE MAYBE HE DOESN'T KNOW THAT WE'RE. THAT'S FINE. MISTER, WOULD YOU CONTINUE, PLEASE? ALL RIGHT. THE ONLY THING I HAVE FOR THE AD FOR THE SECOND READING IS THAT I DID REACH OUT TO THE SUPERVISOR OF ELECTIONS OFFICE AND TALKED WITH MISTER BABINEC. HE INDICATED THAT THEY HAD HAD SOME ISSUES WITH NAME CHANGES AND HONORARY NAME CHANGES, TRIGGERING PROBLEMS WITH THE VOTER REGISTRATION PROCESS.
WHERE THAT ISSUE SEEMED TO BE CONCENTRATED WAS THE DRIVER'S LICENSES. APPARENTLY YOU ARE ALLOWED TO NOT USE THE OFFICIAL ADDRESS ON YOUR DRIVER'S LICENSE, AND SOME FOLKS WILL THAT HAVE LIVED ON A-1-A HAD CHANGED THE DRIVER'S LICENSE TO REFLECT JIMMY BUFFETT MEMORIAL HIGHWAY INSTEAD OF THEIR OFFICIAL ADDRESS OF A-1-A. AND WHEN THEY CAME TO DO THEIR VOTING, THEIR OFFICIAL ADDRESS DID NOT MATCH THE ADDRESS ON THE DRIVER'S LICENSE, AND THEREFORE THAT TRIGGERED A REJECTION OF THEIR VOTE. AT THAT POINT IN TIME, THE RESOLUTION THAT I PROPOSED TO THEM IS THAT AS PART OF OUR OUTREACH TO THE COMMUNITY, FOR ANYBODY THAT IS ALONG A CORRIDOR WHERE WE HAVE DONE A HONORARY RENAMING AS THAT, WE WILL PROVIDE A FORMAL NOTICE AND WARNING THAT THE HONORARY NAMING DOES NOT CHANGE THEIR OFFICIAL ADDRESS FOR THE PURPOSES OF VOTING, AND SHOULD NOT BE USED FOR THEIR DRIVER'S LICENSES IN CASE THAT CAUSES A PARTICULAR ISSUE OF CONFUSION. THANK YOU FOR REACHING OUT, I APPRECIATE THAT. OUTSIDE OF THAT, I HAVE NOTHING FURTHER TO ADD FOR THE SECOND READING.
OKAY. NO MORE QUESTIONS, MAYOR. QUESTION, SIR. SO IF THAT IF THAT'S THE THE ISSUE IS THE DRIVER'S LICENSE. SO THAT KIND OF BEGS THE QUESTION FOR ME. SO WHAT IS THE COST TO GET A NEW
[01:10:06]
DRIVER'S LICENSE? TYPICALLY I DO NOT HAVE THE EXACT COST FOR A NEW DRIVER'S LICENSE. OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. I HAD TO DO IT RECENTLY. IT WAS ROUGHLY $60. BUT AGAIN, RIGHT. THIS AN HONORARY RENAMING WOULDN'T REQUIRE HONORARY WOULDN'T REQUIRE THAT. BUT A PERMANENT REQUIRES THAT, CORRECT? YES. AN INDIVIDUAL HAS TO PAY THAT. CORRECT. OKAY. THAT'S WHAT I WAS GETTING AT. THANK YOU MAYOR OKAY. ANYTHING ELSE? ANY OKAY. THE PUBLIC HEARING. NO SIGN UP SHEET. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING. BRING BACK THE COUNCIL. MAYOR. GO AHEAD. MR. HANLEY, ORDINANCE 2025 DASH 51 SECOND. HAVE A MOTION BY MISS HANLEY. SECOND BY MRS. BASSETT. SECOND READING.ROLL CALL. VOTE, PLEASE. COUNCIL MEMBER. BASSETT. COUNCILMEMBER. HANLEY.
COUNCILMEMBER. KENNEDY. COUNCILMEMBER. SMITH. COUNCILMEMBER. LARUSSO. VICE
[C.9. Pineda Causeway Booster Pump Station Chemical Storage and Feed Improvements, Project No. 31023. a. Contract award for the Pineda Causeway Booster Pump Station Chemical Storage and Feed Improvements, Project No. 31023, L7 Construction, Inc., Longwood, FL - $1,423,700. b. Task Order No. CDM 04 to the Continuing Services Contract for Professional Consulting Services for Services During Construction for the Pineda Booster Pump Station Storage Chemical and Feed Improvements, Project No. 31023, CDM Smith, Inc., Maitland, FL - $135,195.]
MAYOR. NEWMAN. MAYOR. ALFREY. THAT MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER NINE. MISS BAGNOLI. AND. YEAH. MOVE THEM UP. OKAY. YEAH. GOOD EVENING. MAYOR. COUNCIL, THIS ITEM IS FOR A CONSTRUCTION CONTRACT AWARD TO L-7 CONSTRUCTION OF LONGWOOD, FLORIDA, FOR THE PINEDA CAUSEWAY BOOSTER PUMP STATION. CHEMICAL ADDITION. SO, BACK IN 20 2011, THE PINEDA BOOSTER STATION WAS CONSTRUCTED. 2 MILLION GALLON STORAGE TANK AND PUMPS TO HELP BOOST PRESSURES AND FLOWS IN THE SYSTEM. HOWEVER, IT WAS ONLY A YEAR OR SO AGO THAT WE COMPLETED THE PINEDA CAUSEWAY 16 INCH TRANSMISSION MAIN OVER TO THE BEACH SIDE. SO NOW THAT THAT TRANSMISSION MAIN IS HELPING TO MOVE WATER TO THE BEACH SIDE, IT'S TIME TO ADD THE CHEMICAL ADDITION, WHICH IS THE CHLORINE AND AMMONIA, WHICH FORMS CHLORAMINES TO HELP BOOST THE CHLORINE IN THE SYSTEM. SO AGAIN, IT'S CONSTRUCTING SOME CHEMICAL STORAGE AND A CANOPY AND SOME PIPING, ELECTRICAL INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROLS TO MOVE THAT, TO PUMP THAT INTO THE WATER SYSTEM. AND ON OCTOBER 21ST, WE RECEIVED THREE BIDS FOR THE PROJECT, WITH THE APPARENT LOW BIDDER BEING L-7 CONSTRUCTION OF LONGWOOD, FLORIDA, WHO SUBMITTED A BID IN THE AMOUNT OF $1,423,700, AND THAT WAS REVIEWED BY THE ENGINEER OF RECORD. THIS IS ALSO THE SAME CONTRACTOR WHO'S CURRENTLY HAD BEEN AWARDED FOR THE BIOSOLIDS IMPROVEMENTS AT BOTH DB LEE AND GRANT STREET, AND THEY'VE BEEN PERFORMING SO FAR. ADDITIONALLY, THIS ITEM INCLUDES A TASK ORDER TO CDM IN THE AMOUNT OF $135,195 FOR ADDITIONAL ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION. THAT'S REALLY JUST REQUESTING APPROVAL OF THE CONTRACT AWARD AND APPROVAL OF THE TASK ORDER. OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS MAGNOLIA? NO QUESTIONS.NONE. ALL RIGHT. DO WE HAVE A MOTION FOR ITEM A? MAYOR? GOOD, SIR. RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF CONTRACT AWARD TO L7 CONSTRUCTION INC, LONGWOOD, FLORIDA, FOR THE PINEDA CAUSEWAY BOOSTER PUMP STATION. CHEMICAL STORAGE AND FEED IMPROVEMENTS. PROJECT NUMBER 31023, IN THE AMOUNT OF 1,423,000 AND $700,000, $700. OKAY, WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND BY MISS KENNEDY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? I VOTE AYE, AND A MOTION PASSES. MB MAYOR. GO AHEAD. SIR. APPROVAL OF TASK ORDER NUMBER CDM ZERO FOUR TO CDM SMITH, INC. MAITLAND, FLORIDA FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES DURING CONSTRUCTION IN THE AMOUNT OF $135,195. SECOND, WE HAVE A MOTION BY MISS MOTION AND SECOND, BY MR. SMITH. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? I VOTE AYE, AND THAT MOTION PASSES. WE'RE GOING
[C.10. CONSENT AGENDA]
TO MOVE ON TO ITEM NUMBER TEN. THE CONSENT AGENDA. NOTHING WAS. NO. THERE WAS A THE FOURTH QUARTER BUDGET AMENDMENT WAS FOR THE FOURTH QUARTER BUDGET AMENDMENT OKAY. THAT'S ITEM L, ITEM L, A ITEM A, A THROUGH K AND M. WE HAVE A MOTION. MAYOR. GO AHEAD. I MAKE A MOTION TO APPROVE ITEMS A THROUGH K AND M OKAY. SECOND HAVE A MOTION. SECOND, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY[C.11. ITEMS REMOVED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA]
AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? I VOTE ON THAT MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 11, WHICH WOULD BE L WHO PULLED IT? OKAY. GOOD. SIR. HE'S GOING TO PRESENT. YEAH. GO AHEAD. GOOD[01:15:06]
EVENING, MAYOR AND COUNCIL. BEAR WITH ME REAL QUICK AS I GET SET UP. SO THIS IS GOING TO BE RATHER BRIEF BY COMPARISON TO SOME OF OUR PRIOR QUARTERLIES. NOT AS MUCH HAPPENS ON OUR FOURTH QUARTER. IT'S GENERALLY GOING TO BE A TIDYING UP OF ANY VARIANCES THAT WE'VE NOTICED, AS WELL AS ANY SORT OF LAST MINUTE ITEMS THAT NEED TO BE ADDRESSED BEFORE THE END OF THE 60 DAY PERIOD AFTER THE FISCAL YEAR ENDS. SO MAIN THING THAT YOU'RE SEEING UP THERE IS THE GENERAL FUNDS DECREASE OF 1.9 MILLION. AT THIS POINT IN THE YEAR, WE TYPICALLY REMOVE ANY UNSPENT ARPA FUNDS FROM THE BUDGET TO PREVENT ANY LARGE VARIANCES.IT'S JUST KIND OF A HOUSEKEEPING ITEM. MORE THAN ANYTHING. THE SHIP FUND HAS PROGRAM ADMIN THAT WE WERE RECOGNIZING WORKERS COMPENSATION FUND. WE SAW SOME INCREASES IN THE NUMBER OF WORKER COMPENSATION CASES AND AS, AS A RESULT, AN INCREASE IN THE AMOUNT OF EXPENSES IN THAT FUND. SAME THING WITH THE RISK MANAGEMENT FUND. ONE NOTE ON THE RISK MANAGEMENT FUND THAT WAS DISPROPORTIONATELY HITTING THE GENERAL FUND, THIS TIME IN AN ASSET SURVEY, WE IDENTIFIED THAT THERE WAS AN UNDERREPORTING OF GENERAL FUND VALUE WITHIN OUR INSURED ASSETS. SO THIS IS A CORRECTION OF THAT. AND THEN WITHIN THE CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT FUND, WE MADE A COUPLE OF ITEMS FOR A VARIETY OF PROJECTS TO CLEAN UP CERTAIN BALANCES, RECOGNIZE CERTAIN GRANTS AND THE LIKE. LOOKING AT THE GENERAL FUND A LITTLE MORE SPECIFICALLY, THE HERE ARE SOME OF THE BIGGER VARIANCES THAT WE NOTICED, AT LEAST FROM REVENUES PERSPECTIVE. WE'VE BEEN TALKING ABOUT ELECTRIC UTILITY TAX AND ELECTRIC FRANCHISE FEES FOR THE MAJORITY OF THIS YEAR. WE'VE OBVIOUSLY BEEN OPERATING IN AN ENVIRONMENT WHERE WE HAVE A 2024 STORM SURCHARGE, RECOVERY COSTS THAT WILL BE GOING AWAY IN DECEMBER. BUT WHAT REALLY SPURRED ON THIS ADDITIONAL BUDGET VARIANCE, FROM WHAT WE'VE PREVIOUSLY SEEN, WAS PROBABLY WHAT WAS OUR HIGHEST MONTH OF USAGE ON RECORD IN TERMS OF KILOWATT HOURS. THIS THIS PREVIOUS AUGUST, I WAS LOOKING FOR ANY, ANY POSSIBLE REASON THAT WOULD DRIVE. THAT SEEMS LIKE IT WAS THE SAME WARMTH, AT LEAST WHEN LOOKING AT 24 VERSUS 25, IT MAY JUST BE A RELIC OF, YOU KNOW, SOMETHING THAT THE BILLING CYCLE COVERED A FEW MORE DAYS THAT MONTH. I HAVEN'T HAD AN ABILITY TO REALLY GET ANY MUCH FURTHER INTO IT, BUT SEEING THAT HISTORIC MONTH IN AUGUST IS WHAT DROVE THOSE THOSE ADDITIONAL VARIANCES THERE, INTEREST INCOME, AS WE'VE TALKED ABOUT FOR IF WE HAVE BALANCES IN THE BANK AND IT'S EARNING INTEREST, WE'VE NOT SEEN THOSE RATE CUTS GOING AS QUICKLY AS WE THOUGHT, EVEN STILL. AND SO THERE WAS JUST A LITTLE BIT MORE INTEREST INCOME TO TO RECOGNIZE. WE ALSO HAVE PLAN CHECKING FEES, FIRE PLAN REVIEW FEES AND BUILDING PERMITS. IF YOU REMEMBER, BACK IN JULY, YOU INCREASED BY 25% ROUGHLY THEREABOUT. SOME OF THESE FEES. SO THIS IS THE IMPACT OF WHAT YOU'RE SEEING FROM THAT, THAT INCREASE. AND THEN THE ONLY THING REALLY OF NOTE AT THE BOTTOM THERE IS YOUR LAKE WASHINGTON MITIGATION BANK AND SALE OF SURPLUS PROPERTY. THESE ARE ONE TIME REVENUES. WE GENERALLY LIKE TO PUT THEM TO OUR CAPITAL PROJECTS. ONE THING THAT WE DID DIFFERENTLY THIS TIME AROUND WAS FOR THE LAKE WASHINGTON MITIGATION BANK. THE 500,000 THERE THAT WAS PURCHASED AND CREATED BY THE TRANSPORTATION IMPACT FEE ZONE ONE, FOR THE PURPOSES OF EVENTUALLY MITIGATING THE COST OF DOING THE WASHINGTONIA ROAD EXTENSION. THAT'S IN THE LONG RANGE PLAN FOR ADDITIONAL ROADWAYS OUT WEST OF 95, SINCE THAT WAS GOING TO REQUIRE A LOT OF WETLAND MITIGATION TO DO SO.
WITH THAT ZONE PRETTY TAPPED OUT ON USES OF OUR EXISTING IMPACT FEES. STAFF THOUGHT IT BEST TO START PUTTING A LITTLE BIT OF MONEY AWAY ON THIS PROJECT, SO THAT WE HAVE THE ABILITY TO STILL KEEP IT MOVING. I KNOW THAT THE COUNTY WAS EXPLORING THE EXPLORATORY STUDY ON THE ALIGNMENT AND THE LIKE, SO WE FELT THAT THIS WAS A GOOD USE OF THAT MONEY AT THIS TIME.
BEYOND THAT, JUST TO TOUCH BACK REAL QUICK ON THE ELECTRIC, JUST BECAUSE THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS RECENT AND IN THE NEWS WHEN WE LOOKED AT THIS CHART FOR THE 1000 KILOWATT HOUR BILL, WHEN WE FIRST STARTED THE BUDGET PROCESS, IT WAS THAT VERY TINY DOTTED LINE THAT WAS UP TOP THERE THAT SAYS 2020 OR 2000. FEBRUARY 25TH 28TH OF 2025 PROPOSED NEW TARIFF RATES.
A LOT OF LARGER ADVOCACY GROUPS AND FPL CAME TOGETHER AND PROVIDED A PROPOSED RATE SETTLEMENT ON AUGUST 20TH. IF YOU HAVE BEEN WATCHING THE NEWS THAT WAS JUST RECENTLY ACCEPTED, SO WHAT WE WERE USING INITIALLY IN THE BUDGET, IT ACTUALLY CAME IN A LITTLE BIT LOWER PER THE 1000 KILOWATT HOUR BILL THAN WHAT WE SAW MOVING FORWARD. AND JUST AS A REMINDER, FOR AT LEAST LOOKING AT IT FROM OUR REVENUE STANDPOINT, AS THE STORM SURCHARGE DISAPPEARS AND THAT SLIGHTLY LOWER RATE COMES INTO EFFECT, WE SHOULD SEE A MIRRORING OF WHERE WE'RE ANTICIPATING OUR BUDGET TO GO VERSUS THE ACTUALS THAT WE'RE SEEING, PROVIDED THAT THERE'S NO INCREASE IN CONSUMPTION. SO OUTSIDE OF THAT, THAT WAS ALL I HAD PREPARED FOR THE MEETING.
BUT IF THERE WAS ANYTHING SPECIFIC IN THERE THAT YOU WOULD LIKE ME TO ADDRESS, I'D BE HAPPY TO DO SO. SURE. MAYOR, JUST JUST TO EXPLAIN PART OF MY THOUGHT ON IT. ONE FIRST OF ALL, I WANT TO THANK YOU AND YOUR TEAM ONE, FOR THE GREAT WORK THAT YOU GUYS DO IS DOING AN AMAZING JOB. YOU ALSO NOTED SOMETHING THAT'S VERY IMPORTANT, WHICH IS OUR MAJOR REVENUE
[01:20:01]
SOURCES ARE SHOWING THAT WE'RE OVERESTIMATING THE BUDGET, NOT OVERESTIMATED OVERPERFORMING THE BUDGET AT THE MOMENT, WHICH IS FANTASTIC NEWS TO HEAR, ESPECIALLY AS WE'RE GOING INTO A SEASON WHICH MAY BE DIFFICULT FOR CITY BUDGETS GOING FORWARD. SO THAT BEING SAID, THE REASON WHY I PULLED THIS, AND IF YOU HAVE NOTICED, I PULLED THEM ON A QUARTERLY BASIS. THEY GIVE US THIS QUARTERLY. THIS USED TO BE AN AGENDA ITEM. AND THEN I DON'T REMEMBER WHEN IT WAS RELEGATED INTO CONSENT, ESPECIALLY NOW THAT WE'RE GOING THROUGH INTERESTING TIMES WHEN IT COMES TO THE REVENUE SOURCES FOR THE CITY, I THOUGHT IT MIGHT BE WORTH OUR WHILE TO CONSIDER HAVING THIS AS AN AGENDA ITEM TO GET THIS REPORT ON A CONTINUAL BASIS. SO IF THE COUNCIL WOULD PROVIDE CONSENSUS, I'D BE INTERESTED IF WE MIGHT BE INTERESTED IN HAVING THIS JUST AS AN AGENDA ITEM EACH TIME. SO ROSS COULD GIVE US AN UPDATE, YOU KNOW, QUARTER BY QUARTER HOW THINGS ARE GOING. WE'VE THERE WAS ONE QUARTER ONCE IT WAS $10 MILLION OF SURPLUS. THAT WAS THAT WAS AN ANOMALY. I'M NOT GOING TO NEAR NORMAL, BUT THAT THERE WAS A LOT GOING ON THERE. AND I THINK IT'S JUST USEFUL TO KNOW. SO OKAY, YOU'RE DONE. GOOD. AND THEN WHEN WAS THE LAST TIME IT WAS AN AGENDA ITEM? I BELIEVE THIS WAS CONSENT AGENDA FOR QUITE A LONG TIME. I WANT TO SAY THAT IT PREDATES MY TIME AS DIRECTOR. YEAH, I MEAN YEARS I MEAN, SINCE IT'S BECAME A I'M NOT ARGUING IT. YEAH, BUT IT WASN'T WHEN YOU'RE HERE. NO, NO IT WASN'T WHEN I WAS. NO, OF COURSE NOT. I MEAN, IT WENT THROUGH THE CONSENT AGENDA ITEM BECAUSE IT WAS IT, IT WAS JUST THAT SIMPLE. ALL RIGHT. SO IF WE WANT TO SIMPLIFY IT AND COMPLICATE IT MORE AND FIND OUT MORE IN DEPTH, I'M FOR IT. IT'S OKAY. BUT I JUST WANTED TO CLARIFY. OH SURE. OF COURSE. YEAH. AND THAT'S NOT DURING EITHER OF YOUR TENURES. I DON'T KNOW WHEN THAT TIME WAS. IT'S ALWAYS BEEN THE CONSENT AGENDA. OKAY. SO GREAT. CLEAR THAT. I CAN AGREE WITH THE VICE MAYOR. BUT WHAT I WOULD SAY IS THAT ANY TIME WE'RE TALKING ABOUT BUDGETARY OR FISCAL OR MONEY, I HAVE NO ISSUES IN HAVING A DISCUSSION ABOUT IT, BECAUSE YOU NEVER KNOW WHAT KIND OF KNOWLEDGE WE CAN GLEAN FROM IT. AND I DON'T THINK IT TAKES AWAY I THINK IT ADDS VALUE, ESPECIALLY WHEN YOU'RE TALKING. I MEAN, SOME OF THE FOLKS HERE, THIS IS THEIR SECOND TERM. BUT, YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY FIRST TIME NEW MEMBERS LIKE MYSELF, DEFINITELY THERE'S VALUE IN HEARING INFORMATION AND THEN BEING ABLE TO SEE A TREND UP OR DOWN, YOU KNOW, I THINK THERE'S VALUE IN THAT. SO THAT'S WHERE I WOULD SIT WITH THAT. YEAH. SO OKAY. SO WHAT'S YOUR GOAL, VICE MAYOR. WELL NO I THINK WE JUST NEED CONSENSUS TO THE GOAL IS I THINK THAT WOULD BE IMPORTANT, ESPECIALLY DURING THESE INTERESTING AND SOMETHING POSSIBLY WILD TIMES, DEPENDING ON WHAT HAPPENS IN THE LEGISLATURE AND WHAT HAVE YOU, TO HAVE THIS OFF CONSENT AND US TO HAVE ROSS GIVE US A QUARTERLY UPDATE ON THE STATE, OR JUST OKAY TO PULL IT EVERY TIME TO. WELL, I MEAN, I'VE BEEN PULLING IT EVERY TIME, BUT I FIGURE IT'S EITHER ONE. THE POOR MAYOR, EVERY TIME IT'S TO LOOK OVER TO ME. AND THEN HERE I AM, THE BAD GUY PULLING THIS THING WHO PULLED IT, RIGHT? SO LIKE I SAID, THAT THAT'S MY UNDERSTANDING. SO, I MEAN, I'M COUNTING THREE. I DON'T KNOW IF ANYBODY ELSE. FOUR. YEAH, I WOULD JUST PUT IN MY $0.02 IN. YOU'RE GOING TO PULL IT EVERY TIME ANYWAY, RIGHT? OKAY. SO AT THAT POINT WE MIGHT AS WELL JUST PUT IT ON THE AGENDA SO THAT ROSS CAN PREPARE FOR IT TO BE ON THE AGENDA. BUT IT IS GOOD INFORMATION TO HAVE AND TO HAVE A DISCUSSION ON IT. THANK YOU. IF YOU'LL ALLOW, I'LL TALK ABOUT GOVERNMENT FINANCE AS LONG AS ANYBODY'S WILLING TO LISTEN. I THINK I THINK WE'VE PROVEN WHAT HAVE WE DONE? WHAT HAVE WE DONE? SO SOMETIMES YOU GET WHAT YOU YOU WISH FOR. ONE THING I DO WANT TO POINT OUT, AT LEAST REGARDING THE VICE MAYOR'S COMMENTS REGARDING THE INTERESTING TIMES WE'RE IN, YOU KNOW, WHERE WE WERE ABLE TO IDENTIFY SOME OF THESE ONE TIME REVENUES AND APPROPRIATELY USE THEM FOR NON-RECURRING COSTS. I DO WANT TO CAUTION COUNCIL THAT IF, YOU KNOW, THERE'S A LOT OF NON IDENTIFIED FUNDING SOURCES FOR IF SOME OF THESE THESE PROPOSALS TO ELIMINATE OR REDUCE PROPERTY TAX WERE TO MOVE FORWARD. SO I DO WANT TO POINT YOU TO OUR SALES TAX REVENUES BECAUSE THAT'S BEEN TYPICALLY WHEN THE STATE DOES LOOK TO ADJUST ITS TAX CODE, TYPICALLY WILL USE SALES TAXES AS A WAY TO OFFSET THEM. I'VE NOT HEARD THAT AS BEING THE PROPOSED USE OF IT, BUT I DO WANT TO WARN COUNCIL THAT WHILE YES, WE HAD SOME BRIGHT SPOTS THIS YEAR, SALES TAX IS NOT ONE OF THEM. SO IF THE IDEA HERE IS THAT IF YOU'RE EVER GOING TO HAVE SOME SORT OF LEGISLATION REMOVING PROPERTY TAXES IN FAVOR OF A SALES TAX OR ANY LIKE, YOU'LL HAVE TO BASICALLY RUBBER STAMP GROWTH TO MAKE YOUR BUDGET WORK IN THE FUTURE YEARS. AND I DON'T WANT TO SEE YOU HAVE TO DO THAT. SO JUST IN LINE WITH WHAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT PREVIOUSLY, WITH WHAT WE'VE TALKED ABOUT GOING TO THE FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES WITH JUST WANT TO CAUTION YOU ON THAT. AGAIN, BRIGHT SPOTS THIS YEAR THAT WE WERE ABLE TO TAKE ADVANTAGE OF. BUT IF THAT'S THE LONG TERM SOLUTION FOR WHAT THE PROPERTY TAX DISCUSSION GOES WITH, THAT'S A HARD, HARD PILL TO SWALLOW. AND MAYOR, JUST SO I COULD RESPOND TO THAT. YES. JUST SO YOU KNOW, FOR YOU AND YOUR TEAM'S SAKE AND FOR JENNY AND EVERYONE ELSE, EVERY TIME WE TALK ABOUT PROPERTY TAX WITH THE STATE REPRESENTATIVE, AT LEAST I CAN SPEAK ON MY BEHALF. I ALWAYS BRING UP THAT FORMULA THAT YOU, THAT YOU'VE EDUCATED ME ABOUT, AND HOW WE REALLY NEED TO FIND A WAY WHERE WE'RE[01:25:02]
GETTING. FOR THOSE WHO DON'T KNOW, UNFORTUNATELY, OUR POPULATION IS GROWING, BUT THE AMOUNT OF MONEY THAT WE'RE RECEIVING DUE TO THAT POPULATION IS DECREASING BASED ON THIS FORMULA. IT'S NOT PERFECT. AND SO TRYING TO FIND A WAY FOR THEM TO MAKE IT FAIR FOR US BASED ON THE REVENUES AND WHAT OUR IMPACTS ARE. SO BUT ANYWAY, THANK YOU. JUST AS A CAUTIONARY TALE, YOU GAVE ME THE OPPORTUNITY. I'M GONNA TAKE IT EVERY TIME. ABSOLUTELY. NO, I APPRECIATE YOU DOING IT. SO WAS OKAY. WAS THAT SO? THERE'S POTENTIALLY POTENTIALLY TWO THINGS, RIGHT? ONE, BECAUSE IT WAS PULLED FROM THE CONSENT AGENDA. WE STILL NEED ACTION ON RESOLUTION NUMBER 4389 TO WHETHER TO ADOPT THESE FOURTH QUARTER BUDGET. ADJUSTMENTS.AND THEN SECONDLY, IF THERE'S IF WE WANT TO GET COUNCIL CONSENSUS TO JUST HAVE THE QUARTERLY BUDGET ADJUSTMENTS AS A REGULAR AGENDA ITEM RATHER THAN THE CONSENT AGENDA, BUT DO NEED TO TAKE ACTION ON RESOLUTION 4389. SO, MAYOR, GO AHEAD. I MOTION TO APPROVE ITEM L SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. OKAY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? MOTION PASSES. ALL RIGHT. AND THEN DO WE DO YOU NEED A MOTION OR JUST CONSENSUS? JUST CONSENSUS I THINK. DO WE HAVE CONSENSUS. NO THAT'S NOT PULL IT EVERY TIME. I MEAN I'LL PULL IT EVERY TIME. BUT. WELL HE CAN PULL IT EVERY TIME. HE CAN PULL IT EVERY TIME. HE'S LIKE I THINK THERE'S ONLY ONE, ONE NAYSAYER. OKAY. SO ARE WE GOOD ON THAT ONE? NAY, SIR. ALL RIGHT. WE'RE GONNA MOVE TO ITEM. COUNCIL MEMBER SMITH IS REQUESTED THAT ITEM NUMBER 20
[C.20. Discussion regarding a revision to Council Policy #36 — Travel and Per Diem. (Requested by Council Member Marcus Smith) (Postponed - 10/28/2025)]
BE. HEY, COUNCIL, REAL QUICK. COUNCILMEMBER. COUNCILMEMBER SMITH HAS ASKED FOR ITEM 20 TO BE PULLED UP. IS IS THERE ANY OBJECTION TO THAT? ARE THERE PEOPLE HERE TO SPEAK? YEAH.OKAY. PEOPLE. IS THAT OKAY WITH ANYBODY? HAVE ANY OBJECTIONS? SURE. OKAY. THANK YOU MAYOR. NO PROBLEM. THANK YOU. COUNCIL, YOU HAVE A COUPLE OF DOCUMENTS BEFORE YOU. I'LL READ THE THE DOCUMENT THAT I PUT TOGETHER JUST TO SORT OF SET THE STAGE AS TO WHAT ITEM NUMBER 20 IS ABOUT. AND FOR THOSE FOLLOWING ALONG IN THE AUDIENCE ITEM AGENDA ITEM 20. SO THIS IS AN ITEM THAT I TALKED ABOUT A WHILE BACK AS A REVISION TO COUNCIL POLICY NUMBER. POLICY NUMBER 36, OUR TRAVEL AND PER DIEM. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REVISION IS TO ADD THE GREATER PALM BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, THE BREVARD, AND WE VENTURE TO THE LIST OF ORGANIZATIONS THAT CITY FORMALLY RECOGNIZES AS SERVING A VALID PUBLIC PURPOSE. ALONGSIDE THE CURRENT THREE APPROVED ORGANIZATIONS WE HAVE, WHICH IS THE SPACE COAST LEAGUE OF CITIES, THE MELBOURNE REGIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE AND ECONOMIC, THE EDC FLORIDA SPACE COAST. AND SO I'M NOT GOING TO TALK THROUGH THE POINTS THAT I HAVE HERE, BUT I DO WANT TO HAVE THE ORGANIZATIONS GIVE HIM A COUPLE OF MINUTES TO KIND OF TALK ABOUT THEMSELVES, AND THEN AFTER THEY FINISH TALKING, I CAN FURTHER SUMMARIZE MY POINTS, IF THAT'S OKAY. MAYOR. ALL RIGHT. SO YEAH. SO LET'S HAVE THE THE PALM BAY CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COME FORWARD FIRST.
THAT WOULD BE NANCY, PELOTON AND THE NEW PRESIDENT NANCY RETIRED AND THE NEW PRESIDENT OF THE PALM BAY CHAMBER. SHE NEVER RETIRES. NANCY, YOU HAVE TO COME FORWARD TO COME ON. SHE HAS TO STAND RIGHT NEXT TO ME AND MAKE SURE I DO THIS. THAT'S RIGHT, THAT'S RIGHT. WELL, GOOD EVENING AND THANK YOU, MAYOR AND COUNCIL, FOR ALLOWING ME TO SHARE BRIEFLY ABOUT THE ACTIVITIES OF THE GREATER PALM BAY CHAMBER. I'M COREY SKATES, THE NEW PRESIDENT AND CEO OF THE CHAMBER. AND I'M JOINED TONIGHT BY OUTGOING PRESIDENT AND CEO NANCY PELTONEN. IN THE CHAMBER INDUSTRY, WE OFTEN SAY, IF YOU'VE SEEN ONE CHAMBER, YOU'VE SEEN ONE CHAMBER. EVERY CHAMBER IS UNIQUE, SHAPED BY THE NEEDS, PRIORITIES AND OPPORTUNITIES OF THE COMMUNITY IT SERVES. AT THE GREATER PALM BAY CHAMBER, OUR WORK EXTENDS WELL BEYOND PALM BAY. WE PROUDLY SERVE BUSINESSES ACROSS THE SPACE COAST, INCLUDING RIGHT HERE IN MELBOURNE. IN FACT, 187 OF OUR MEMBERS ABOUT ONE THIRD OF THE MEMBERSHIP ARE MELBOURNE BASED BUSINESSES.
UNDERSCORING HOW TRULY REGIONAL AND INTERCONNECTED OUR BUSINESS COMMUNITY IS. OUR INITIATIVES DIRECTLY SUPPORT THE NEEDS OF MELBOURNE'S EMPLOYERS, RESIDENTS AND NEIGHBORHOODS, INCLUDING THE BREVARD PROSPERITY INITIATIVE, WHERE ONE OF OUR CORE FOCUS AREAS IS MELBOURNE'S 32 901 ZIP CODE, WORKING TO ADVANCE ECONOMIC MOBILITY, REDUCE BARRIERS TO EMPLOYMENT AND STRENGTHEN LONG TERM COMMUNITY PROSPERITY. OUR MULTICULTURAL NETWORKING GROUP, WHICH FOSTERS INCLUSIVE ECONOMIC ENGAGEMENT AND RELATIONSHIP BUILDING ACROSS BREVARD COUNTY'S DIVERSE BUSINESS COMMUNITY. THESE MEETINGS OFTEN INCLUDE EDUCATIONAL COMPONENTS SUCH AS PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT TOPICS, CULTURAL BUSINESS INSIGHTS, OR SMALL BUSINESS RESOURCES. SCATTY THE SMALL OR THE SPACE COAST ALLIANCE FOR TECH AND INNOVATION BRINGING TOGETHER MANUFACTURERS, TECH FIRMS, SPACE AND DEFENSE COMPANIES,
[01:30:01]
STARTUPS AND INNOVATORS TO COLLABORATE, NETWORK AND DISCUSS GOVERNMENT CONTRACTING AND SHARE BEST PRACTICES. THE ANNUAL MAYOR'S BREAKFAST, PROVIDING DIRECT ENGAGEMENT BETWEEN MUNICIPAL LEADERS AND THE BUSINESS COMMUNITY. THE SPACE COAST SYMPOSIUM, WHERE MELBOURNE BASED BUSINESSES SUCH AS NORTHROP GRUMMAN, EMBRAER, MELBOURNE, ORLANDO INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT, TOMAHAWK ROBOTICS, FLORIDA TECH, JACOBS AND L3 HARRIS HAVE SERVED AS PANELISTS, HIGHLIGHTING THE DEPTH AND INFLUENCE OF MELBOURNE'S LEADERSHIP ACROSS KEY INDUSTRIES. ADDITIONALLY, OUR MONTHLY CHAMBER LUNCHEONS TYPICALLY DRAWING WELL OVER 100 BUSINESS AND COMMUNITY LEADERS, ARE CURRENTLY HELD RIGHT HERE IN MELBOURNE AT THE ASN SCHREINER CENTER, REINFORCING OUR COMMITMENT TO SERVE AND ENGAGE MELBOURNE'S EMPLOYERS DIRECTLY. WE ALSO COLLABORATE CLOSELY WITH THE MELBOURNE REGIONAL CHAMBER ON EVENTS RANGING FROM JOINT RIBBON CUTTINGS TO MAJOR REGIONAL INITIATIVES SUCH AS THE ANNUAL TALLAHASSEE BREVARD DAYS TRIP AND THE SPACE COAST POLITICAL HOBNOB. THESE PARTNERSHIPS ENSURE THAT THE SPACE COAST SPEAKS WITH ONE UNIFIED VOICE ON ISSUES IMPACTING OUR CITIES AND BUSINESSES. TOGETHER, THESE EFFORTS CREATE A POWERFUL PLATFORM FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT, BUSINESS ENGAGEMENT, AND REGIONAL COLLABORATION, WHILE ENSURING MELBOURNE'S PRIORITIES AND PERSPECTIVES ARE WELL REPRESENTED IN REGIONAL CONVERSATIONS. WE DEEPLY VALUE OUR RELATIONSHIP WITH THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, AND WE WOULD BE HONORED TO CONTINUE EXPANDING THAT PARTNERSHIP THROUGH YOUR INVOLVEMENT IN OUR SIGNATURE EVENTS AND INITIATIVES. THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS, CHAIRMAN AND MR. LEWIS, I THINK WE'RE ALL VERY FAMILIAR WITH. WE'LL HAVE A CONVERSATION CHAMBER. OKAY. YEAH. REAL QUICK.ARE YOU GOING TO BE AT THE MAYOR'S BREAKFAST IN THE FUTURE? YES. NO. OKAY. YES. YOU DON'T HAVE TO ANSWER THAT. WE SHALL SEE. OKAY. THANK YOU. ALL WONDERFUL INFORMATION. I LEARNED A LOT JUST HEARING IT THIS TIME. SO NEXT WE'LL HAVE LEE BREVARD. YOU HAVE SLIDES OR WE HAVE WE HAVE THEM BEFORE US TO WE DO. GOOD EVENING MAYOR COUNCIL I'M KRISTEN BAKI. I HAVE THE PLEASURE OF SERVING BREVARD AS THEIR PRESIDENT AND CEO. AND WE ARE YOUR COMMUNITY'S RESOURCE FOR ENGAGING TALENT DEVELOPMENT TRAINING. THANK YOU.
EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING AND ACCESS TO TRANSFORMATIONAL PERSPECTIVES. FOR ALMOST 40 YEARS SINCE 1986, LEAD BREVARD HAS HELPED INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS MAKE AN IMPACT WITH CONFIDENCE, CONNECTION, AND COURAGE. OH, THERE WE ARE. THERE WE GO. YEAH. THANK YOU.
IN 2026, WE'LL CELEBRATE THE 40TH ANNIVERSARY OF BREVARD. AND FOR ALMOST 40 YEARS, WE'VE BEEN OFFERING AN UNMATCHED ARRAY OF LEADERSHIP, DEVELOPED AND OPTIMIZED OVER TIME TO MEET THE UNIQUE NEEDS OF THIS COMMUNITY. SEVERAL PEOPLE IN YOUR COUNCIL CITY STAFF ARE PROUD GRADUATES OF THE BREVARD PROGRAM. MORE THAN 1700 LEADERS SINCE 1986 HAVE GRADUATED FROM ONE OF OUR PROGRAMS. WE WORK TO DESIGN OPPORTUNITIES TO INSPIRE, CHALLENGE, AND CONNECT BUSINESS AND CIVIC LEADERS FROM ALL CAREER STAGES AND BACKGROUNDS. THIS SLIDE SHOWS YOU FOUR OF OUR MAIN PROGRAMS. OUR MISSION IS WORKING TOGETHER TO STRENGTHEN OUR COMMUNITY BY INSPIRING PEOPLE TO LEAD. WE'D LIKE TO BE IN OUR VISION IS TO BE THE TRUSTED LEADER, CONNECTOR, AND CATALYST THAT EMPOWERS INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS TO BUILD ENDURING NETWORKS, ENGAGE IN IMPACTFUL LEADERSHIP ROLES, AND ADDRESS COMMUNITY NEEDS. MEMBERSHIP IS AVAILABLE TO NON GRADUATES OF THE LEADERSHIP PROGRAMS. WE ARE EVENTS ARE PRICED ON A MEMBER AND NONMEMBER BASIS. WE'D WELCOME YOUR PARTICIPATION. I WANT TO POINT OUT A COLLABORATIVE PARTNERSHIP THAT HAPPENED AS RECENTLY AS LAST WEEK. CITY STAFF UNDER IN CONVERSATION WITH COUNCILMAN SMITH. WE WERE ABLE TO BRING A MOCK CITY COUNCIL PLANNING AND ZONING KIND OF CONVERSATION TO OUR CURRENT CLASS OF LEADERSHIP. BREVARD, THANKS TO CINDY DITTMAR, AND I SEE ROBERTS HERE AND CHERYL ENGAGED, AND IT WAS WELL RECEIVED BY OUR 55 LEADERSHIP BREVARD PARTICIPANTS. SO WE THANK YOU FOR THE TIME THAT THEY WERE ABLE TO TO SHARE WITH US AND BRING THAT KIND OF HANDS ON OPPORTUNITY TO OUR GRADUATES, OUR FOUR UNDER 40
[01:35:02]
LEADERSHIP AWARDS IS CELEBRATING THE 22ND ANNUAL IN IN 2026. WE DID A LITTLE BIT OF BACKGROUNDING AND REALIZED THAT OVER 25% OVER THE LAST 22 YEARS OF THOSE RECOGNIZED AS FINAL FOUR UNDER 40 RECIPIENTS REPRESENT MELBOURNE COMMUNITY MEMBERS. THEIR BUSINESS, BASICALLY 25% OF THOSE PEOPLE CALL MELBOURNE HOME. SO WE WOULD LIKE TO INVITE YOU TO JOIN US AT ANY OF THE EVENTS. OUR WEBSITE IS WW. BREVARD. I'D BE DELIGHTED TO WELCOME ANY AND ALL OF YOU TO OUR EVENTS OR PROGRAMS. THANK YOU FOR THE OPPORTUNITY. THANK YOU. KRISTIN.WONDERFUL INFORMATION. THE THIRD ORGANIZATION AS WE VENTURE, KATHERINE. DOCTOR KATHERINE ROLOFF HAS BEEN HERE A FEW TIMES WITH US. SHE'S NOT ABLE TO BE HERE TONIGHT, BUT THEY DID SEND SOME INFORMATION, SOME MORE STATISTICS, WHICH I THINK ARE SOME REALLY GOOD INFORMATION ABOUT THE IMPACT TO MELBOURNE. AND AS WE KNOW, WE VENTURE IS A PART OF FLORIDA TECH, WHICH IS RIGHT HERE IN OUR BACKYARD. AND THERE ARE SOME OTHER THINGS THAT WE'RE TALKING ABOUT DOING AS FAR AS WHAT WE VENTURE. SO SORT OF TO FINISH OUT SOME OF THE INFORMATION THAT I HAVE ON THE PROPOSAL BEFORE YOU ALL, YOU KNOW, JUST HEARING IT DIRECTLY FROM THE ORGANIZATIONS, WE HAVE ANY QUESTIONS FROM THEM. BUT I, I THINK MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE APPROVAL OF ADDING THESE THREE ADDITIONAL ORGANIZATIONS TO OUR COUNCIL POLICY. NUMBER 36, CITY CLERK AT A I THINK THAT WAS THE FEBRUARY MEETING. I THINK, KEVIN, THAT YOU PROVIDED SOME OF THE NUMBERS BEHIND THE INFORMATION. I DON'T KNOW IF DO YOU HAVE THAT RIGHT BEFORE YOU WANT TO TOUCH ON THAT, OR MAYBE IF THEY HAVE ANY QUESTIONS. IF NOT, THEN WE CAN MOVE FORWARD. BUT WERE THERE ANY QUESTIONS ABOUT THAT. SO I GOT A QUESTION. YES, SIR. YEAH.
GO AHEAD. OKAY MR. MAYOR. OH YEAH. OKAY. THANK YOU. I'M ALL ABOUT ADVOCATING FOR MY CITY.
I'VE BEEN UP HERE TOO LONG AND I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO LEAVING. OKAY, SO. BUT HOWEVER, AT THE END OF THE DAY, WHEN I SERVED WITH MAYOR GOOD BACK IN 2004 TO 2012, AFTER THE BUDGET SESSION, WE WOULD ALWAYS HE WOULD ALWAYS LOOK AT US AND WE COME TO THE COUNCIL. WE'RE LOOKING FOR MORE MONEY TO DO THIS OR DO THAT. SO I GOT TWO QUESTIONS. WHAT IS THE TOTAL TO INCLUDE ALL THESE THREE ORGANIZATIONS AND WHERE DOES THE MONEY COME FROM. SO KEVIN, THAT IS THE QUESTION I DON'T KNOW. IT'S HARD TO COME UP WITH A TOTAL SINCE IT WOULD DEPEND ON HOW MANY COUNCIL MEMBERS ATTEND EVENTS BASED ON WHAT WE DO WITH MELBOURNE, WITH MELBOURNE CHAMBER. I CAN TELL YOU THAT IN THE FISCAL YEAR 26 BUDGET, THE LINE ITEM IS ABOUT $7,800. AND WE WE REACHED THAT ABOUT EVERY YEAR. OKAY. WITH THE CURRENT ORGANIZATIONS ON THERE. SO IF YOU DOUBLE THAT FOR THREE ADDITIONAL ORGANIZATIONS, THAT COULD BE THAT WOULD BE A REASONABLE AMOUNT OF MONEY. ANOTHER 7000, $810,000 IS WHAT WE'RE LOOKING AT. IF WE HAVE THREE ORGANIZATIONS NOW AND YOU HAD THREE MORE AND YOU ATTEND RELATIVELY THE SAME NUMBER OF EVENTS THAT WOULD THAT WOULD TRACK, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. NOW, I MEAN, I DON'T HAVE $10,000 IN MY BACK POCKET, YOU KNOW, BUT MAYBE ROSS CAN TELL US WHERE IT COULD COME FROM BECAUSE WE'RE ALREADY COME THROUGH BUDGET. AGAIN. I SAY I ADVOCATE FOR MELBOURNE CROSS BORDER AND I AND I COMPLIMENT YOU ON THIS PRESENTATION, BUT I REALLY CONCERNED MYSELF WITH WHERE THE MONEY IS COMING FROM AND HOW WE PAY FOR IT. NOW AS IT COMES TO COUNCIL BUDGET, DOES IT COME OUT OF OF COURSE, WE CUT THAT COUNCIL BUDGET BY FIVE GRAND THIS YEAR, RIGHT? OKAY. SO WE'RE CUTTING WE'RE WE'RE CUTTING OUR FUNDING TO WHAT WE HAVE AVAILABLE TO US AS COUNCIL MEMBERS IN OUR COUNCIL BUDGET. SO WHERE IS THE ADDITIONAL $10,000 GOING TO COME FROM. SO WHEN WE CUT THE COUNCIL BUDGET, I THOUGHT THAT WAS JUST FOR THAT PARTICULAR YEAR. WAS THAT LIKE A TOTAL THIS COMING YEAR? YES. YEAH. OKAY. THIS CURRENT YEAR, THAT'S THE ONLY QUESTION I GOT FOR YOU, COUNCILMAN SMITH. BUT I'M WILLING TO GO FORWARD. LIKE I SAID, I'LL ADVOCATE FOR FOR MELBOURNE ALL DAY LONG. I HAVE A PROBLEM. OKAY. GO AHEAD MA'AM. OKAY. I HAVE A PROBLEM.
WE ARE MELBOURNE. WHY ARE WE JOINING PALM BAY? WE HAVE DIFFERENT. MELBOURNE IS A VERY DIFFERENT ECONOMIC SITUATION. WE'RE MORE. PALM BAY TO ME IS A BEDROOM COMMUNITY, SMALLER BUSINESSES. WE'RE HERE. WE HAVE MORE MANUFACTURING. I MEAN, I KNOW IN IN PALM BAY YOU HAVE HARRIS. WELL, YOU DON'T HAVE THEIR HARRIS HEADQUARTERS, BUT YOU HAVE A A LARGE BUSINESS, A LARGE FACILITY THERE. IN FACT, THAT'S ONLY ONE. SO BUT WE'RE MELBOURNE, WE'RE NOT PALM BAY.
AND I HAVE A HARD TIME BEING THE PALM PART OF PALM BAY CITY, NOT CITY COUNCIL, CHAMBER OF
[01:40:04]
COMMERCE. BECAUSE WE ARE MELBOURNE. WE'RE NOT PALM BAY, WE DON'T. AND HOW MANY ORGANIZATIONS ARE WE GOING TO BE IN AND HOW, AS PEOPLE THAT HAVE TO WORK, I KNOW COUNCIL MEMBER KENNEDY WORKS, I KNOW MAYOR WORKS. I KNOW MR. LARUSSO WORKS. WE CAN'T MAKE ALL THESE MEETINGS WITH ALL THESE DIFFERENT ORGANIZATIONS. WE HAVE A HARD TIME MAKING THE MEETINGS THAT WE HAVE. WE HAVE WITH THE THREE ORGANIZATIONS WE HAVE NOW. AND YOU'RE GOING TO ADD THREE MORE. HOW IS EVERYBODY? I MEAN, ARE WE REALLY GOING TO BE UTILIZING THESE ORGANIZATIONS? MAYOR, ARE YOU DONE? SURE. OKAY. SO I HAVE HIT AND MISS, PROBABLY GONE TO MOST OF THESE EVENTS AS WELL WITH MY DAY JOB AS WELL AS WITH THE CITY, BECAUSE WE AT MY DAY JOB OF OUR PUBLIC SCHOOLS, WE DO HIT ALL OF THEM. BUT THE ONE THING THAT I HEARD TONIGHT WAS SOMETHING THAT I DIDN'T REMEMBER IN THAT MELBOURNE CHANGE OF THE PALM BAY CHAMBER.A LOT OF OUR BUSINESSES IN MELBOURNE ARE PART OF THE PALM BAY CHAMBER, SO I DO THINK THAT THERE'S A CAUSE TO ADD THEM. BUT TO MR. LARUSSO'S POINT, WE TOOK THE MONEY OUT. SO THEN WHERE ARE WE GOING TO PUT IT IN? AND I'M OPEN FOR SUGGESTIONS AND OPEN FOR, YOU KNOW, COMMENTS OF WHERE THAT MONEY MIGHT COME FROM, MAYBE FROM STAFF AS WELL. BUT I DO THINK IT'S VALID AND IT DOES, I THINK I DON'T THINK EVERYBODY NEEDS TO GO TO EVERYTHING. THAT'S THE BEAUTY OF SENDING ONE PERSON OR TWO PEOPLE AND THEN COMING BACK AND PRESENTING IT FOR THE GOOD OF THE GROUP AND WHAT THEY'VE LEARNED AND WHAT INFORMATION THEY CAN BRING BACK. BUT WHERE'S THE MONEY COMING FROM? THAT WOULD BE MY ONLY QUESTION. YEAH, YEAH. AS WELL AS MR. RUSSO. OKAY. REAL QUICK, VICE MAYOR. GOOD. SO MY $0.02 IS THIS ONE ONE TO PIGGYBACK OFF OF MISS KENNEDY'S POINT, ANOTHER THING THAT I HEARD ABOUT THE PALM BAY CHAMBER WAS A LOT OF THEIR MEETINGS OCCUR IN MELBOURNE, AND I GOT A PRIME EXAMPLE. AROUND THE CORNER FROM MY HOUSE IS A LAUNCH CREDIT UNION. AND THE MULTICULTURAL COMMITTEE, YOUR GROUP, I GET YOU KNOW WHAT I'M TALKING ABOUT. THEY'VE MET AT THAT THAT THAT BANK. AND SO THEY DO MEET IN MELBOURNE. SO I DO NOT WANT TO DISCOUNT ANY WAY, SHAPE OR FORM THAT THEY'RE NOT BRINGING BUSINESS OR SUPPORTING BUSINESS TO THE CITY OF MELBOURNE. SO BUT THAT BEING SAID, TO MISS KENNEDY'S POINT, I WOULD MAYBE BE OPEN TO ONE LIMITING IT INSTEAD OF IT BEING A BROAD BASE OF SEVERAL DIFFERENT GROUPS. WE APPROACH THIS IN A FOR NEXT FISCAL YEAR. LIKE IF YOU MADE A VOTE TODAY THAT WE WERE GOING TO CONSIDER JOINING ONE, 2 OR 3 OF THEM, IT WOULD BE, CAN WE VOTE TO JOIN THEM ON IN OCTOBER OF NEXT YEAR? AND WE'D HAVE TO GO THROUGH THE BUDGET PROCESS, AND THE BUDGET PROCESS WOULD HAVE TO ALLOCATE IT. BUT AS FAR AS ADDING IT TO THIS BUDGET, I'M NOT GOING TO SUPPORT THAT. I, I MEAN, AND THAT'S REALLY JUST A MINIMAL THING. AND I'M GOING TO TELL YOU AND YOU'VE SEEN ME VOTE SEVERAL, SEVERAL TIMES ON IT. I MEAN, I PAID MY OWN WAY THROUGH BREVARD. I GO AND PAY FOR THESE EVENTS. WE GET AN ALLOTMENT FROM THE FROM THE CITY. THAT'S PART OF WHAT WE GET PAID TO DO THESE THINGS. SO I'M NOT NECESSARILY A BIG FAN OF USING IT FOR THOSE ENDEAVORS. SO IF WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A BROADER DISCUSSION ABOUT PUTTING IN THE BUDGET NEXT YEAR AND WHAT THAT LOOKS LIKE, I'M OPEN TO THAT.
BUT THAT'S A NEXT YEAR BUDGET ITEM. I WOULD NOT DO IT THIS YEAR. SO, SO GOOD DISCUSSION.
SO, SO MAYOR, IF IF I COULD GET MAYBE CONSENSUS, MAYBE I COULD SPEND A LITTLE. SO TONIGHT'S MEETING, IT'S SORT OF BEEN A WE'VE BEEN BUILDING UP TO THIS. RIGHT. SO SO FIRST OFF THANK YOU TO THE NONPROFITS FOR BEING HERE. AND THEY'VE BEEN HERE SEVERAL TIMES. AND I THINK WE'VE ALL GLEANED INFORMATION AND CLARIFIED A LITTLE BIT MORE ABOUT WHAT IT IS THAT THEY DO AND THE VALUE THAT THEY BRING NOT ONLY TO THE CITY OF MELBOURNE AND TO US INDIVIDUALLY AND COLLECTIVELY. BUT WHAT I WOULD LIKE TO POTENTIALLY DO IS MAYBE I CAN SPEND A LITTLE TIME WITH STAFF AND SEE IF $15,000 COULD BE IDENTIFIED AND AND IF THAT IS A WORTHWHILE ENDEAVOR AND EXERCISE, THEN MAYBE WE CAN DECIDE FROM THERE. AND THEN I HEAR THE VICE MAYOR'S POINT ABOUT MAYBE NEXT FISCAL YEAR, BECAUSE THIS CAME UP BEFORE THE BUDGET AND I WAS SUPPOSED TO BRING IT UP, BUT THEN IT JUST. YEAH. SO IF, IF WOULD THAT BE AMENABLE IF I GO AND WORK WITH STAFF AND SEE IF WE CAN FIND $15,000 CONSENSUS FOR THAT TOO.
OKAY. QUICK QUESTION I HAVE IS THIS IS THE CITY OF PALM BAY, A MEMBER OF OUR MELBOURNE CHAMBER.
I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S SOMETHING WE COULD FIND OUT. YES THEY ARE. YEAH. SO SO THINK ABOUT THAT. THE CITY OF PALM BAY IS A MEMBER OF THE MELBOURNE CHAMBER. JUST A THOUGHT. AND DOESN'T REALLY DARE TO SWAY YOU. BUT GOOD. MISS LAMB, I JUST WANT TO CLARIFY. ARE YOU LOOKING FOR $15,000 MORE OR A TOTAL OF 15,000? IT SOUNDS LIKE TO ME IT WOULD BE APPROXIMATELY A TOTAL OF 15,000. OKAY. YEAH. WHICH WOULD COVER THE AND AND AND THE
[01:45:05]
POINT ABOUT THE SIX ORGANIZATIONS. SO EDC, THERE'S REALLY NOT A BUDGETARY AMOUNT THAT WE SPEND FOR EDC. SO SOME OF THIS IS REALLY SORT OF NOTIONAL SUPPORT OF PARTNERSHIP.AND SO I THINK JUST BY HAVING ORGANIZATIONS HERE TONIGHT AND THEY GO OUT AND SAY, HEY, NOW THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, WE'RE ABLE TO WE HAVE A BETTER RELATIONSHIP WITH THEM AND THINGS LIKE THAT. AND THE BUSINESSES THAT THEY HEAR THAT THAT'S A LOT OF THIS IS WHAT THAT'S ABOUT, THAT PUBLIC GOOD. RIGHT. SO, YOU KNOW, COLLABORATION EFFORTS, I MEAN THERE'S A LOT TO SAY ABOUT THAT. SO YEAH. YEAH. MA'AM, PLEASE. JUST THINKING OUTSIDE THE BOX TOO. AND MAYBE PART OF WHAT YOU LOOK FOR IS HOW MUCH IS IT FOR US TO GO AS MEMBERS AS OPPOSED TO NONMEMBERS. SO MAYBE JUST GOING FOR THE MEMBERSHIP AS OPPOSED TO EVERY SINGLE MEETING TO MAKE IT CHEAPER TO GO TO THE MEETING? THAT'S ANOTHER WAY TO KIND OF LOOK AT IT AS WELL AND SEE HOW MUCH WE'VE ALREADY SPENT ON TRAVEL SO FAR, IF THERE'S GOING TO BE ANY OVERAGES AND, AND JUST MONITOR THE BUDGET THAT WAY, THAT SOUNDS FAIR TO ME. SO I WANT TO BE CLEAR, JULIE, IS THAT YOU'RE SAYING THAT WE JOINED THE YOU'RE PROPOSING THAT WE JOIN THE ORGANIZATIONS, BUT WE PAY FOR THE INDIVIDUAL TIMES THAT WE GO THERE OUT OF OUR OWN POCKET WITH THE MONEY THAT MR. NEWMAN HAS. MEMBERSHIP IS CHEAPER MENTIONED BEFORE.
THAT'S IN OUR PACKAGE AS WELL TOO. OKAY. SO TO MAKE IT CHEAPER, I'M JUST THROWING.
YEAH, I THINK THAT I THINK THE ONLY ONE THAT WE CAN JOIN OTHER TWO ARE NOT JOINABLE. THEY ONLY HAVE THEIR INDIVIDUAL EVENTS. THEY'RE NOT JOINABLE ORGANIZATIONS. OKAY. WELL, I WOULD RECOMMEND THAT YOU WORK WITH STAFF, AND I THINK THERE'S A CONTINGENCY FUND THAT WILL IT'S HOVERING MAYBE A LITTLE UNDER $100,000 RIGHT NOW. BUT THOSE ARE HARD TIMES WHEN WE PULL INTO THAT. RIGHT. SO LOOK AT OKAY SHARP PENCIL. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU ALL. GOOD DISCUSSION I THINK WE LEARNED A LOT I WISH WE ADVENTURE WAS HERE. THEY WOULD PROVIDE EVEN MORE ADDITIONAL DETAILS. SO MR. SMITH, THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT FORWARD BECAUSE I THINK WE ALL GO TO THE EVENTS AND THEY BRING INCREDIBLE VALUE TO OUR COMMUNITY. AND, AND, YOU KNOW, CAN'T SAY ENOUGH ABOUT, YOU KNOW, THE RELATIONSHIP WE HAVE WITH THE CHAMBERS AND WHAT THEY DO WHEN IT COMES TO THE SMALL BUSINESSES. SO THANK YOU. THANK YOU. MAYOR. YEAH. THE MAYOR'S BREAKFAST IS A GREAT EXAMPLE. WE DO THAT. HAVE A GOOD TIME EVERY YEAR. YEAH. YES WE DO.
[C.12. Ordinance No. 2025-52, El Car Wash: (First Reading/Public Hearing) An ordinance granting a conditional use (CU2025-0002) to allow a car wash establishment in a C-2 (General Commercial) zoning district with site plan approval (PLAN2025-0006) on an overall 2.54±-acre property located on the east side of North Wickham Road, north of Sarno Road, and south of West Eau Gallie Boulevard. (Owner - 925 WICKHAM LLC) (Applicant/Representative - Jordan Draper, P.E.) (P&Z Board - 11/6/2025)]
ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU ALL. ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 12. THIS IS OKAY. THIS IS GOING TO BE ORDINANCE 20 2552. MR. CONLEY THANK YOU MAYOR. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AS IT RELATES TO GENERAL ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005. DASH 120 BY GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW FOR A FREESTANDING CAR WASH ESTABLISHMENT ON A 2.54 PLUS OR MINUS ACRE PROPERTY. ZONED C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL, LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF WICKHAM ROAD, NORTH OF SARNO ROAD AND SOUTH OF EAU GALLIE BOULEVARD. 925 NORTH WICKHAM ROAD, PROVIDING FOR SITE PLAN APPROVAL.PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL. PROVIDING THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE GRANTED HEREIN MAY BE REVOKED BY CITY COUNCIL IF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARE NOT MET, PROVIDING THAT THE PROPERTY SHALL BE DESIGNATED ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BY THE SYMBOL C, C-2, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. THANK YOU. REPORT ON THIS IS MISS CINDY DITTMER. YES. GOOD EVENING. THIS IS THE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE FOR A CAR WASH, WITH SITE PLAN APPROVAL ON A 2.54 ACRE PROPERTY ZONED C-2.
THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF NORTH WICKHAM ROAD, NORTH OF SARNO ROAD, AND SOUTH OF EAU GALLIE BOULEVARD. THE PROPERTY IS A GENERAL COMMERCIAL FUTURE LAND USE AND IS LOCATED IN COUNCIL DISTRICT FIVE. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING WHAT IS CURRENTLY A VERIZON RETAIL STORE THAT'S ON THE SITE, PROPOSING DEMOLISHING THAT AND BUILDING BACK APPROXIMATELY A 3700 SQUARE FOOT CAR WASH. IT'LL BE AN AUTOMATIC CAR WASH WITH THREE DRIVE UP BAYS, AND ALSO WILL INCLUDE ACCESSORY VACUUM STATIONS. THE CAR WASH IS PROPOSED TO BE OPEN SEVEN DAYS A WEEK, AND WILL OPERATE FROM 7 A.M. TO 9 P.M. AND THEY TYPICALLY HAVE 3 TO 5 EMPLOYEES THAT ARE ON SITE ASSISTING THEIR PATRONS. THE CAR WASH DOES REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL. THAT'S WHY IT'S BEFORE YOU THIS EVENING IN THE C-2 ZONING. THE CITY CODE DOES CONTAIN SPECIFIC USE STANDARDS FOR CAR WASHES. THE PROPOSED SITE PLAN DOES MEET ALL OF THOSE USE STANDARDS. ADDITIONALLY, DURING THE REVIEW, THE NOISE STUDY DID CONFIRM THAT IT DOES MEET THE NOISE ALLOWANCES OF BEING UNDER 60 DECIBEL DECIBEL LEVELS OF SOUND AT THE PROPERTY LINES. HOWEVER, THE APPLICANT IS ALSO INSTALLING TWO ADDITIONAL WING WALLS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SITE PLAN HERE. THE BUILDING IS
[01:50:01]
THERE IN RED AND THEN THE LITTLE PURPLE ADDITIONAL WALLS AT THE ENTRANCE AND EXIT OF THE CAR WASH TO CONTINUE TO ATTENUATE ANY OF THE NOISE THAT COMES OUT OF THE FACILITY FROM THOSE TWO SIDES. ADDITIONALLY, STAFF HAS REQUIRED THE. VACUUM PRODUCERS THAT PRODUCE ALL THE NOISE FOR THE VACUUM TO ALSO HAVE SEVEN FOOT EIGHT INCH WALLS. CONCRETE WALLS AROUND THOSE ON THREE SIDES TO ALSO CONTAIN THE NOISE COMING FROM THOSE VACUUM PRODUCERS. AND THEN ADDITIONALLY, THE APPLICANT WILL ALSO PROVIDE AIR GATES AND SOUND ABSORBING PANELS WITHIN THE CAR WASH BUILDING. AND THAT'S TYPICAL OF WHAT WE SEE THESE CAR WASH FACILITIES, AGAIN, TO TRY TO ABSORB THE SOUND COMING OUT OF THEM. THE SURROUNDING AREA IS PRIMARILY DEVELOPED FOR COMMERCIAL USES. THERE ARE MULTIFAMILY RESIDENTIAL PROPERTIES LOCATED WITHIN THE 500 FOOT AREA TO THE NORTH, AND THERE ARE NO SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCES WITHIN THAT 500 FOOT AREA. THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST, AND STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2552 WITH PLAN 2025 0006, BASED UPON THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM. OKAY. THANK YOU, MISS DITTMAR. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS DITTMAR? I HAVE A QUESTION, MA'AM, BECAUSE I KNOW THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY, THE EASEMENT GOING ON TO SARNO ROAD, THE THE EXTENT THE THE HOW DO YOU PUT THIS THE EXTENSION THAT GOES INTO. YEAH, IT GOES INTO THEY CAN THEY DON'T HAVE TO GO ONTO WICKHAM ROAD. THEY CAN GO ON TO SARNO ROAD. RIGHT. IT'LL HAVE ACCESS TO BOTH. IT'S BEHIND. YEAH. YEAH OKAY. DOES I MEAN CHILI'S, WILL THAT STILL HAVE THE SAME. YES. A SHARED ACCESS. THAT ACCESS IS THE SARNO AND THE O'GALLEY OR THE WICKHAM ROAD DRIVEWAYS. I DIDN'T WANT IT. SO THAT CHILI WAS KNOCKED OFF. NO. OKAY. WON'T CHANGE THAT. ACCESS TO CHILI'S. THAT'S. THAT'S WHAT I NEEDED TO KNOW.MISS KENNEDY, PLEASE, JUST A WEIRD COMMENT QUESTION. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAVE THE ANSWER TO IT, SO I DON'T MEAN TO PUT YOU ON THE SPOT, BUT WE HAVE A LOT OF CAR WASHES GOING UP. OH MY GOD, A LOT OF DIFFERENT PLACES. HAVE ANY OF THE CAR WASHES THAT HAVE GONE UP, GONE UNDER, CLOSED DOWN? YOU MAY NOT HAVE THAT ANSWER. I DON'T I DON'T KNOW THAT ANY HAVE GONE ANY NEWER ONES THAT HAVE HAPPENED IN THE LAST 4 OR 5 YEARS HAVE GONE DOWN, YOU KNOW, GONE UNDER AND BUSINESS. THERE HAS BEEN A COUPLE THAT COUNCIL'S APPROVED THAT HAVEN'T ACTUALLY OCCURRED YET, PARTICULARLY I THINK THERE WAS ONE AT DAIRY AND EBER, AND THERE'S AN ADDITIONAL ONE UP ON NORTH WICKHAM ROAD THAT HAVEN'T COME OUT OF THE GROUND YET. SO I AGREE THERE ARE A LOT OF CAR WASHES. THEY DO CONTINUE TO COME IN AND PUT IN APPLICATIONS. THEY KEEP MAKING MONEY BY ALL MEANS. BUT IT JUST THERE'S THERE'S GOING TO BE LIKE THE CVS WALGREENS FOR CAR WASHES.
YEAH. RIGHT. NEXT HUGE. BUT YES MISS LAMB I JUST WANTED TO ASK MISS DITTMER IF SHE COULD CLARIFY THE ONE ACROSS THE STREET AND SLIGHTLY NORTH OF HERE, THE THAT CAR WASH IS, IS GOING TO TURN INTO A RESTAURANT, ISN'T IT? RIGHT. SO THERE'S A SORT OF SELF-SERVE CAR WASH TO THE NORTH NORTHWEST THERE, AND THAT WE HAVE UNDER REVIEW A DUTCH BROTHERS COFFEE STORE DRIVE THROUGH THAT'S PROPOSED ON THAT SITE. SO THAT IS GOING TO GO AWAY. SO THAT OLDER STYLE OF SOME OF THOSE, I HAVE SEEN SOME OF THOSE DISAPPEARING. YEAH. THERE'S ONE ON AURORA.
YEAH. YEAH. OKAY. GOOD TO. SO, SO THERE ARE A LOT OF LOT OF CAR WASHES AND A COUPLE OF QUESTIONS RELATED TO THAT. DON'T REALLY BRING IN A LOT OF EMPLOYEES. I MEAN SO AND I DON'T JUST REALLY A POINT I NOTICED THAT WE REALLY SEE ABOUT THAT. AND THEN ANOTHER FOLLOW UP QUESTION, IF IT WAS TO GO UNDER, HOW HARD IS IT TO CONVERT A CAR WASH TO SOMETHING ELSE? IS THAT PRETTY DIFFICULT? I WOULD THINK A REUSE OF A CAR WASH BUILDING WOULD BE PRETTY DIFFICULT BECAUSE OF WATER INFRASTRUCTURE. CORRECT? RIGHT, RIGHT. IT IS. IT IS A CONDITIONAL USE. IT IS, YOU KNOW, IT IS BASED ON, YOU KNOW, COUNCIL'S CONSIDERATION OF CITY CODE REQUIREMENTS AND FINDINGS, YOU KNOW, TO ALLOW A CAR WASH IN THESE ZONING DISTRICTS. SO THAT'S, YOU KNOW, PART OF WHAT WE'RE HERE, YOU KNOW, TO PRESENT TO YOU, WE DO HAVE
[01:55:02]
FINDINGS WITHIN THE STAFF REPORT IN FAVOR OF THOSE. THOSE ARE FINDINGS THAT WE'VE PRESENTED, YOU KNOW, IN THE PAST, IF THERE'S OTHER FACTORS THAT FALL WITHIN THE CONFINES OF THE ZONING CODE THAT YOU WOULD LIKE STAFF TO LOOK AT IN THAT REALM, WE, YOU KNOW, WE WOULD NEED THAT DIRECTION TO TO LOOK AT THOSE. WHAT ARE SOME OF THOSE FINDINGS, MAYOR, IS THE COMPANY HERE TONIGHT? I BELIEVE THEY ARE. YEAH. WE DO HAVE A COUPLE SPEAKER CARDS. YES, MA'AM. OKAY. BECAUSE I WOULD JUST LIKE TO HEAR FROM THEM. TO SEE MY THING IS WHEN YOU TALK ABOUT THAT ON SARNO, IF YOU LOOK. GO WHERE THE THE RED LINE IS ON SARNO, A LITTLE BIT OLDER, MAYBE. TWO, THREE BOXES OVER. THERE'S ALREADY CAR WASH OVER THERE. SO WE'RE PUTTING CAR WASHES ON TOP OF CAR WASHES. AND I DO LIKE I DID READ SOME OF YOU. I DIDN'T READ EVERYTHING ON YOUR THING. I KNOW THEY YOU THEY USE PEOPLE THAT ARE ARTISTIC. YOU DO ARTISTIC. AND PEOPLE WITH DOWN SYNDROME SOME. THANK YOU VERY MUCH FOR THAT. YOU USE MORE SPECIAL NEED. I DON'T KNOW IF THAT'S THE RIGHT WORD. NEURODIVERSE. THAT WAS IT. OKAY.NEURODIVERSE PEOPLE THAT WERE READING THAT, THAT I DON'T KNOW IF YOU DO THAT FROM ALL YOUR ORGANIZATIONS. I MEAN, NOT ALL YOUR ORGANIZATIONS, ALL YOUR CAR WASHES OR NOT. ARE YOU JUST GOING TO BE DOING THIS ONE? BUT WE ARE PUTTING THAT CAR. I MEAN, I SEE GOOD AND BAD, BUT WE'RE PUTTING WE'RE SO CLOSE. WE'RE NOT EVEN WITHIN A MILE. WE'VE GOT TWO CAR WASHES RIGHT THERE.
AND THEN IF WE'RE ALREADY LOSING THE ONE UP JUST NORTH OF IT, PROBABLY ANOTHER QUARTER MILE UP THERE, ARE WE PUTTING SO MANY CAR WASHES THAT ONE'S HAVING GOING AWAY IN THAT AREA WITH A QUARTER MILE. AND WE'RE PUTTING ANOTHER ONE IN THERE. SO I LIKE TO SAY WE'RE NOT PUTTING IT IN THERE THAT THAT'S NOT OUR CAR WASH. YEAH. BUT I MEAN WE'RE ALLOWING WE'RE ALLOWING THAT CAR WASH TO GO IN THERE. AND IF IT'S GOING TO BE CAR WASH, CAR WASH, CAR WASH, BUT WE DON'T CONTROL THE MARKETPLACE, I CAPITALISM I UNDERSTAND I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT WE HAVE LIKE SHE SAID, WE DON'T HAVE TO HAVE THAT IN THAT IT'S CONDITIONAL USE. SO THAT'S IF I CAN IF I CAN PIGGYBACK ON THAT A LITTLE BIT, IT WOULD, IT WOULD STILL BE A DETERMINATION THAT A PARTICULAR PROJECT DIDN'T MEET THE PARTICULAR STANDARDS FOR CONDITIONAL USES WITHIN CODE. RIGHT. IT'S NOT A IT'S NOT A BLANK CHECK TO SAY NO. AND SO IF IF COUNCIL HAS CONCERNS OR THE THINGS, THEN CINDY AND I WOULD PROBABLY WANT TO TALK YOU THROUGH THE PARAMETERS FOR WHAT HOW COUNCIL CONSIDERS CONDITIONAL USES. YOU KNOW AND THAT INFORMATION IS IN THE STAFF MEMO AND THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD REPORT. OR YOU KNOW, IF YOU'RE LOOKING FOR FINDINGS THAT THIS PARTICULAR PROJECT IS UNLIKELY TO BE COMPATIBLE WITH THE AREA OR, YOU KNOW, ISN'T MEETING PARTICULAR HEALTH, SAFETY, WELFARE, YOU KNOW, CONSIDERATIONS, SO ON AND SO FORTH, THEN THAT'S A CONVERSATION THAT WE CAN HAVE.
BUT JUST SAYING, I THINK THERE ARE TOO MANY CAR WASHES IN THE AREA. YEAH. THAT'S NOT THAT'S NOT GOING TO BE MY RECOMMENDED FINDING. IF THERE'S A DESIRE TO, YOU KNOW, CONSIDER SOMETHING OTHER THAN THE RECOMMENDED APPROVAL BY PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD. OKAY. REAL QUICK, MISS KENNEDY. FIRST, JUST TO REITERATE WHAT I SAID. YEAH, THERE ARE A LOT OF CAR WASHES, BUT THEY ALL SEEM TO WORK AND THEY ALL SEEM TO BE MAKING MONEY BECAUSE THEY KEEP POPPING UP. AND THAT'S WHY I WANTED TO TALK TO THE COMPANY TO SEE WHAT THEIR NUMBERS ARE LIKE. WHAT IS THEIR RATIONALE FOR WANTING TO PUT A CAR WASH HERE RIGHT NEXT TO ANOTHER ONE? AND IT'S JUST MY CURIOSITY, OKAY. AND VICE MAYOR, AND THIS IS JUST A QUESTION FOR ADAM. I PERSONALLY JUST KIND OF TAKING A LOOK AT THE PROJECT. I'M NOT QUITE SURE IT FITS WITHIN THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN OF THE AREA. IS THAT AN ACCEPTABLE REASON THAT I COULD TALK TO YOU GUYS OFFLINE ABOUT THAT? YOU KNOW, JUST TO MAKE SURE THAT IT FITS WITHIN YOUR MENTIONING, PLANNING AND ALL THAT STUFF. I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE WITH COMPREHENSIVE PLAN I COULD DO THAT AS WELL. YES, THAT'S IN FACT THE FIRST ITEM OF CONSIDERATION WITHIN THE REVIEW CRITERIA IS THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE NEEDS TO BE CONSISTENT WITH THE THE STANDARDS OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN FOR THIS PARTICULAR SITE. RIGHT? NO, I GET THAT AND IT'S JUST OPINION OF MINE. THAT'S WHY I WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT, YOU KNOW IT WAS FINE THERE.
THANK YOU. OKAY. GOOD SIR. THANK YOU. SO IN RESPECT TO CAR WASHES WE DENIED I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WERE ON COUNCIL OR YOU WERE ON COUNCIL AT THE TIME, BUT WHERE? NEXT TO WAWA ON US
[02:00:01]
ONE. WE WENT THROUGH A WHOLE SERIES OF OF CONVERSATIONS AND ARGUMENTS AND EVERYTHING ELSE.AND TO ADAM'S POINT IS THAT IF YOU'RE GOING TO DENY, WE HAVE TO DENY BASED ON COMPATIBILITY TO THE COMMUNITY SAFETY ISSUES WITH THAT ONE. IT WAS CAR STACKING COMING OUT OF WAWA, COMING OUT OF OUT OF THE CAR WASH AND COMPATIBILITY TO THE TO THE RIVER VIEW BEHIND IT, THE HISTORICAL HOMES. SO IF WE'RE GOING TO GO DOWN A DENIAL ROAD, JUST LIKE ADAM HAS SAID, THAT'S WHERE WE HAVE TO BE. WE JUST CAN'T, LIKE YOU SAID, JUST CAN'T SAY I DON'T LIKE IT. I DON'T WANT IT ANYMORE BECAUSE THEY WILL COME BACK AFTER US. AND THEN THERE YOU GO. AND IT'S HAPPENED BEFORE. MAYOR. LAST QUESTION. GO AHEAD SIR. SO CINDY HAS THERE PRIOR TO THIS PROPOSAL, HAS THERE BEEN ANY OTHER PROPOSALS FOR THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY OR WHAT HAPPENED TO THE VERIZON STORE? WELL, THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY WAS MOST RECENTLY THE VERIZON STORE. AND I THINK BEFORE THAT IT WAS A WHATABURGER. A WHATABURGER. YEAH. YEAH. IT'S BEEN IT'S CHANGED A LOT. AND IT WENT OUT. I COULDN'T SPEAK TO WHY THOSE, THOSE BUSINESSES HAVEN'T, YOU KNOW, CONTINUED AND SUCCEEDED. IT'S A HARD CORNER TO GET IN AND OUT. YEAH. GO AHEAD. ONE MORE QUESTION. DO THE APPLICANTS OWN THIS PIECE OF PROPERTY OR IS IT GOING TO BE CONVERTED OVER TO THEM. THEY'LL CLOSE ON THE PROPERTY IF THIS GOES THROUGH IT GETS APPROVAL FOR IT. I AM NOT AWARE OF THAT OFF THE TOP OF MY HEAD. LET ME SEE. WE PROBABLY NEED TO. THE APPLICANT IS HERE SO THEY WILL REAL QUICK. SO WE'RE GOING TO MOVE OVER TO. ACTUALLY BEFORE WE START THIS IS A QUASI JUDICIAL ITEM. ANY DISCLOSURES? NOPE I NOPE NO DISCLOSURES.
PUBLIC HEARING. SO FIRST IS ALEJANDRO. FOLLOW. AND JORDAN DID Y'ALL WANT TO COME UP TOGETHER. THAT'S FINE OKAY. GOOD EVENING ALEJANDRO QUINTANA, EL CARWASH DIRECTOR DEVELOPMENT I HAVE OUR ENGINEER OF RECORD, JORDAN DRAPER FROM KIMLEY-HORN BELIEVE. CAN YOU REPEAT YOUR QUESTION? I WAS JUST SORRY. I WAS JUST WONDERING. THERE IS ANOTHER CAR WASH TO MISS HANLEY'S POINT. LIKE, RIGHT AROUND THE CORNER. AND THERE ARE A LOT OF CAR WASHES IN THE AREA. I KNOW YOU'RE PROBABLY HAVE DONE A STUDY OF SOME SORT TO SEE THE VIABILITY OF A CAR WASH IN THE AREA, AND I WAS JUST CURIOUS WHAT THE OUTCOME OF THAT WAS. YEAH. SO, YOU KNOW, WE'RE IN OUR OUR SECOND PHASE OF OUR COMPANY'S GROWTH. WE'RE CURRENTLY OPERATING AT 87 STORES, UPWARDS OF 450,000 MEMBERS BETWEEN OUR STORES. WE'RE IN TWO DIFFERENT MARKETS, FLORIDA AND MICHIGAN. WE'RE EXPANDING INTO NEW JERSEY, PHILADELPHIA AND CHICAGO MARKETS IN 2026 AND 2027. AS WE CONTINUE TO ESSENTIALLY BUILD OUT OUR BUSINESS AND DO INFILL STORES. SO WE REALLY CAME IN AND PLANTED OUR FIRST STORES. WE HAVE OUR NEW HAVEN LOCATION, WE HAVE OUR PALM BAY LOCATION. SO RIGHT NOW, NOW WE'RE DOING THE SECONDARY LOCATIONS WHERE WE'RE ALSO ALMOST SUPPORT SITES. SO WE'RE FINDING THAT CUSTOMER TRENDS ARE IN THIS AREA AND WE'RE KIND OF COMING IN TO FILL A GAP. SO YES, WE KNOW THAT THERE'S NUMEROUS BRANDS, BUT YOU KNOW, JUST LIKE MCDONALD'S AND BURGER KING AND WENDY'S, THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE RIGHT NEXT TO EACH OTHER CONCURRENTLY. AND I THINK THAT WE'RE SPACED OUT ENOUGH. WE'VE LOOKED AT THE PLACER DATA. WE'VE LOOKED AT ALL SORTS OF DATA THAT WE HAVE INTERNALLY, THAT WE TRACK THESE THINGS. AND WE'VE DECIDED THAT THIS IS A FEASIBLE LOCATION AND THAT, YOU KNOW, WE'RE NOT SOMETHING THAT'S GOING TO WE'RE NOT A FLY BY THE SEAT OF OUR PANTS AND FLY BY THE NIGHT.
WE'RE NOT GOING TO DISAPPEAR. WE'RE HERE THAT WE HAVE ALL THE WAY THAT WE'RE BUILDING OUT PIPELINES TO 2028, 2029. SO IT'S GOING TO BE A CONTINUED GROWTH. AND THAT'S OUR BUSINESS MODEL. THANK YOU. YEP. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS. WHAT'S THE WHAT'S THE COST. THE RANGE OF COST FOR THE CAR WASH. THERE'S NUMEROUS FACTORS. ARE YOU ASKING ABOUT OUR BUILDING COST OR ARE YOU ASKING ABOUT. WELL YOU SAID MCDONALD'S AND BURGER KING I'M JUST WONDERING THERE LIKE AN EXTRA VALUE MEAL FOR CAR WASHES OR SOMETHING, I DON'T KNOW, I MEAN, WE ARE MEMBERSHIP BASED, I THINK UPWARDS OF PROBABLY APPROXIMATELY 75 TO 85% OF OUR CUSTOMERS ARE ON THAT MEMBERSHIP MODEL. SO JUST LIKE A GYM MEMBERSHIP, YOU CHOOSE, YOU KNOW, DO YOU WANT HIGH, MEDIUM OR LOW? MEDIUM HIGH. AND THEN FROM THERE, YOUR MEMBERSHIP THEN IS INTERCONNECTED BETWEEN ALL OF OUR NETWORKS. SO, YOU KNOW, YEAH, YOU MAY PASS PALM BAY, YOU KNOW, ON YOUR WAY OR YOU'RE UP NEW HAVEN AND YOUR KID HAS A SOCCER GAME OR SOMETHING LIKE THAT, AND YOU'RE ON THE WAY HOME. YOU WANT TO CLEAN THE CAR, YOU CAN GO IN THERE. YOU'RE NOT ONLY HAVE YOU'RE RESTRICTED TO JUST THAT ONE LOCATION, YOU HAVE NOW 87 LOCATIONS THAT YOU, YOUR CAR IS VIABLE AT. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS? DO YOU DO YOU OWN THE PROPERTY NOW OR IS IT AT THIS MOMENT WE ARE IN OUR INSPECTION OR OUR PERMITTING PERIOD OF OUR CONTRACT. SO WE'RE STILL NOT OWNERS OF THE CONTRACT, BUT WE HAVE THE RIGHT
[02:05:03]
CONTRACT ON IT. YEAH, WE HAVE A CONTRACT ON IT. HOW LONG DO THE INSPECTION PERIOD. BALLPARK.BALLPARK? I BELIEVE WE HAVE. I THINK IT'S RIGHT AROUND TILL JANUARY 26TH. OKAY. THANK YOU.
ALL RIGHT. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. DID YOU ALSO WANT TO SPEAK ALSO, SIR.
OR DO YOU JUST ANY OTHER QUESTIONS OKAY. QUESTIONS OKAY. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU SIR. WE'LL CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING THEN WE'LL BRING IT BACK TO COUNCIL. MAYOR. GOOD. MA'AM. APPROVAL ORDINANCE 20 2552 WITH THE PLAN 25 2020 5-006. BASED UPON THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? NAY. NAY. LET'S ACTUALLY LET'S GO DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE, PLEASE. COUNCIL MEMBER. BASSETT. COUNCIL MEMBER. HANLEY. COUNCILMEMBER. KENNEDY. COUNCILMEMBER. SMITH.
[C.13. Ordinance No. 2025-53 and Ordinance No. 2025-54, Lansing RV Storage: (First Reading/Public Hearing) Ordinances providing for a Comprehensive Plan amendment and zoning designation, with site plan approval for an outdoor RV storage area on 6.25± acres, located on the north side of Lansing Street, east of North Wickham Road, and south of Lake Washington Road. (Owner - LAWS HALL PARTNERSHIP LLP) (Applicant/Representative: Justin Archey) (P&Z Board - 11/6/2025) a. Ordinance No. 2025-53/MAP2024-0013: (First Reading/Public Hearing) An ordinance amending the future land use map classification from General Commercial to Heavy Commercial Future Land Use on 6.25± acres. b. Ordinance No. 2025-54/MAP2024-0012: (First Reading/Public Hearing) An ordinance amending the zoning map from C-2 (General Commercial District) to M-1 (Light Industrial District) zoning on 6.25± acres.c. Site Plan Approval (PLAN2024-0019): A request for site plan approval on 6.25± acres. (To be considered by City Council during the second reading of the ordinance.)]
COUNCILMEMBER. LARUSSO. VICE MAYOR. NEWMAN. MAYOR. ALFREY. THAT MOTION PASSES. OKAY, 13 WAS PULLED. WE'LL GO AHEAD, SIR. NO, THERE WAS A REQUEST TO POSTPONE. WE HAVEN'T PULLED IT.OKAY, SO. ALL RIGHT, I'M GOING TO I'M GOING TO STILL READ IT. AND THEN COUNCIL CAN CONSIDER THAT UNDER APPLICANT REQUEST TO POSTPONE IT FOR LEGALITY. ALL RIGHT THEN ITEM NUMBER 13 FOR GO AHEAD SIR. THANK YOU. MAYOR. THIS ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2553, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO COMPREHENSIVE PLANNING, MAKING FINDINGS, AMEND OF AMENDING APPENDIX D, CHAPTER FOUR, SECTION 4.04 OF THE CITY CODE, AMENDING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP OF THE COMPREHENSIVE PLAN BY CHANGING THE FUTURE LAND USE MAP DESIGNATION FROM GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO HEAVY COMMERCIAL ON A 1.83 PLUS OR MINUS ACRE PORTION OF LOT FOUR OF AN OVERALL 6.25 PLUS OR MINUS ACRE PROPERTY. LOTS THREE AND FOUR OF THE LANSING SQUARE COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LANSING STREET, EAST OF NORTH WICKHAM ROAD AND SOUTH OF LAKE WASHINGTON ROAD, PROVIDING FOR A CONDITION OF APPROVAL. PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. THIS, TOGETHER WITH ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2420 2554.
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AS IT RELATES TO GENERAL ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005 120 BY CHANGING THE EXISTING ZONING FROM C TWO GENERAL COMMERCIAL TO M-1 LIGHT INDUSTRIAL ON A 1.83 PLUS OR MINUS ACRE PORTION, LOT FOUR OF AN OVERALL 6.25 PLUS OR MINUS ACRE PROPERTY. LOTS THREE AND FOUR OF THE LANSING SQUARE COMMERCIAL SUBDIVISION, LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LANSING STREET, EAST OF NORTH WICKHAM ROAD AND SOUTH OF LAKE WASHINGTON ROAD, PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE, AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. THANK YOU SIR. SO AGAIN, AS AS YOU'LL SEE IN THE BLUE MEMO, THE APPLICANT WAS UNAVAILABLE FOR THIS EVENING'S MEETING. IT'S MY UNDERSTANDING THAT THAT APPLICANT REPRESENTATIVE HAS DONE MOST OF THE COMMUNICATION WITH THE SURROUNDING PROPERTY OWNERS, THE NEIGHBORS AND OTHER THINGS. AND SO, BECAUSE HE WASN'T AVAILABLE TONIGHT, I WAS ASKING TO POSTPONE SO THAT HE COULD SPEAK TO COUNCIL DIRECTLY AND ADDRESS ANY QUESTIONS OR CONCERNS FROM FROM THE COUNCIL OR FROM NEIGHBORS. IF COUNCIL DOES DESIRE TO POSTPONE THE ITEM, MUCH LIKE YOU'VE HEARD ME SAY IN OTHER OTHER INSTANCES, BECAUSE THIS WAS AN ADVERTISED ITEM, POSTPONEMENT TO A DATE, TIME AND PLACE SPECIFIC WOULD BE APPROPRIATE, RIGHT? I BELIEVE THE APPLICANT'S REQUEST IS TO POSTPONE FIRST READING TO OUR DECEMBER 9TH COUNCIL MEETING AT 6:30 P.M. HERE IN COUNCIL CHAMBER. OKAY, SIR. JUST IN THE REPORT, CITY MANAGER'S CITY MANAGER'S ITEM REPORT IS THAT IT'S NOTED ON THE TOP THAT COUNCIL COUNCIL DISTRICT NUMBER SIX. BUT THEN IN THE LAST PARAGRAPH OF THE THE LAST SENTENCE OF BACKGROUND CONSIDERATION, IT SAYS THE SUBJECT PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN COUNCIL DISTRICT FIVE. SO IF WE CAN, YOU KNOW, MAKE THAT CLEARER FOR THE NEXT MEETING. GOOD CATCH. YES. VERY GOOD. I SEE WHAT YOU'RE POINTING OUT, COUNCILMAN LARUSSO, AND WE WILL FIX THAT, BECAUSE IT IS IN DISTRICT SIX. DETAILS. DISTRICT SIX. YEAH. OKAY. IS IT FIVE OR IS IT SIX? THAT'S SIX. IT'S SIX BECAUSE WHAT'S THAT, MA'AM? SPEAKER REQUEST. NO, WE HAVE NOTHING. GOOD, MR. KENNEDY.
I'LL JUST THROW IT OUT THERE. I MOVED TO POSTPONE IT TO DECEMBER 6TH. A MOTION, A SECOND MOTION, YEAH, B B POSTPONEMENT TO DECEMBER 9TH, 2026, 2025. COUNCIL MEETING AT 630 HEARING COUNCIL CHAMBER SECOND. THE MOTION BY MISS KENNEDY. SECOND BY VICE MAYOR.
[C.14. Ordinance No. 2025-55, Redtail Four Brewery: (First Reading/Public Hearing) An ordinance granting a conditional use (CU2025-0007) to allow a microbrewery use in conjunction with a second conditional use to allow for the consumption of alcohol (beer and wine) on premises in conjunction with a proposed microbrewery and pizzeria on a 1±-acre developed property zoned C-2 (General Commercial District) located on the west side of South Harbor City Boulevard, the east side of Irwin Street and south of Powell Avenue. (Owner - Wid T. Bell) (Applicant/Representative - Chelsea Woodard) (P&Z Board - 11/6/2025)]
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THAT MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON. ITEM NUMBER. NUMBER[02:10:05]
14. ORDINANCE 20 2555. I TOOK IT FOR ALL OF ITEM 13. SORRY. APOLOGIES. THIS IS ORDINANCE 20 2555, AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AS IT RELATES TO GENERAL ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005, 120. BY GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW FOR THE USE OF A MICROBREWERY AND A CONDITIONAL USE FOR CONSUMPTION OF BEER AND WINE ON THE PREMISES, IN CONJUNCTION WITH A PIZZERIA ON A 1.0 PLUS OR MINUS ACRE PROPERTY. ZONE C-2 GENERAL COMMERCIAL LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH HARBOR CITY BOULEVARD, EAST OF ERWIN STREET AND SOUTH OF POWELL AVENUE. 2808 SOUTH HARBOR CITY BOULEVARD, PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, PROVIDING THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE GRANTED HEREIN MAY BE REVOKED BY CITY COUNCIL IF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARE NOT MET, PROVIDING THAT THE PROPERTY SHALL BE DESIGNATED ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BY THE SYMBOL C C-2, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. THANK YOU.PORTLAND, THIS IS MISS DITTMER. YES. THIS IS THE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW BOTH A MICROBREWERY USE, ALONG WITH A CONDITIONAL USE, TO ALLOW CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL JUST FOR BEER AND WINE ON THE PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE PROPOSED PIZZERIA RESTAURANT ON A ONE ACRE DEVELOPED PROPERTY ZONED C-2, LOCATED ON THE WEST SIDE OF SOUTH HARBOR CITY BOULEVARD, THE EAST SIDE OF ERWIN STREET, AND SOUTH OF POWELL AVENUE. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN CITY COUNCIL DISTRICT THREE AND IS ALSO IN THE DOWNTOWN CRA. THE APPLICANT PLANS TO CLEAR THE CURRENT SITE AND DEMOLISH THE EXISTING STRUCTURES, AND CONSTRUCT A 76 AND 50 FOOT SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT BUILDING, AND THERE'S NO FORMAL SITE PLAN BEFORE COUNCIL THIS EVENING. THIS WILL BE REVIEWED AT THE STAFF LEVEL THROUGH THE ENGINEERING CONSTRUCTION PLAN PROCESS AND THROUGH BUILDING PERMITS. THE SITE IS CURRENTLY BLIGHTED AND HAS BEEN UNDER CODE ENFORCEMENT ACTION. THE PROPOSED USE OF THE PROPERTY BY THE APPLICANT IS FOR A NEW, LOCALLY OWNED AND OPERATED PIZZA RESTAURANT AND CRAFT BREWERY. THE ESTABLISHMENT BUSINESS HOURS ARE PROPOSED TO BE FROM 11 A.M. TO 10 P.M. SUNDAY THROUGH WEDNESDAY, AND 11 A.M. TO 12 A.M. THURSDAY THROUGH SATURDAY. THE PROJECT WILL FEATURE A 4940 950 SQUARE FOOT RESTAURANT WITH AN INTERIOR AREA CONTAINING 98 SEATS, AND THERE WILL BE ADDITIONALLY TWO OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS ALONG BOTH EDGES. AS YOU CAN SEE ON THE SITE PLAN HERE, THE MIDDLE PART IS THE INTERIOR, AND THOSE TWO DARKER GOLD AREAS ARE THE OUTDOOR SEATING AREAS THAT WILL HAVE AN ADDITIONAL 84 SEATS AS WELL. ALL THE BREWERY EQUIPMENT AND A FULL KITCHEN WILL BE CONTAINED WITHIN SIDE THE MAIN INTERIOR AREA. THE. WITHIN A 500 FOOT RADIUS. THERE'S A MIX OF USES, SOME HEAVY HIGHWAY COMMERCIAL USES. VEHICLE SERVICE USES OFFICE, RETAIL, FUNERAL HOME, ROOFING COMPANY TO NAME A FEW IN THE PROXIMITY. THE NEAREST RESIDENTIAL USE IS TO THE WEST ACROSS THE FEC RAILROAD AND ADDITIONALLY TO THE EAST ACROSS THE US. ONE HIGHWAY. STAFF'S ADDED MULTIPLE CONDITIONS TO THE ORDINANCE TO ENSURE THAT THE ON PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL FOR THE BEER AND WINE WILL NOT AFFECT THE SURROUNDING AREA. THERE ARE SEVERAL CONDITIONS THAT ARE INCLUDED, LIMITING THE MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY OF THE FACILITY TO 200 PERSONS.
LIMITING THE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL TO WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING OR ON THE COVERED OUTDOOR PATIO AREAS. ADDITIONALLY, LANGUAGE IN THE ORDINANCE, IF THERE ARE TWO OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF THE CITY'S NOISE REGULATION OR OCCUPANCY, IT WOULD BE A BREACH OF THE CONDITIONAL USE, WHICH WOULD THEN COME BACK TO CITY COUNCIL FOR CONSIDERATION. DURING THE THE NOVEMBER 6TH PNC MEETING, THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMBERS WERE DIVIDED IN THEIR CONSIDERATION OF THE MOTION. STAFF HAD PROPOSED RECOMMENDATION OF APPROVAL. THE MOTION TO CONSIDER STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION RESULTED IN A22 VOTE. THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD FAILED TO ACHIEVE A MAJORITY VOTE FOR APPROVAL OF THE CONDITIONAL USE, AND THERE WERE NO FURTHER MOTIONS MADE BY THE BOARD. ADDITIONALLY, AND I ADMIT TO GET IT INTO THE PACKAGE, OUR DOWNTOWN MELBOURNE CRA ADVISORY COMMITTEE DID HAVE A DISCUSSION ABOUT THE PROPOSED PROJECT, ALTHOUGH THEY'RE NOT THE BODY THAT WOULD MAKE A FORMAL RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL, THEY DID HAVE A CONSENSUS FROM THAT BOARD OF FULL SUPPORT FOR APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST FOR THE MICROBREWERY AND THE PIZZERIA, WITH THE ALCOHOL CONSUMPTION ON SITE. AND SO WITH THAT, STAFF WILL RECOMMEND APPROVAL. ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2555 BASED
[02:15:07]
UPON THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED WITHIN THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM. GREAT. THANK YOU. CINDY. ANY QUESTIONS FOR CINDY? YES, VICE MAYOR CINDY, WHAT DOES THIS ADDRESS ON US? ONE. DO YOU HAVE THE ADDRESS? I THINK 28 08I BELIEVE. 28 OH, OKAY. ALL RIGHT. BECAUSE SO EVERYTHING THAT'S CURRENTLY THERE WILL BE WILL BE TORN DOWN.AND YEAH, THIS IS THE SITE IF THAT HELPS YOU TO DETERMINE WHERE IT'S AT. IT'S IT'S A LITTLE BIT NORTH OF UNIVERSITY POWELL IS THE CROSS STREET ON THE NORTH SIDE OF THE PROPERTY.
IT'S FORMERLY BEEN USED NOT IN FULL CONFORMANCE WITH CITY CODE. AS YOU CAN SEE, THERE'S A LOT OF OUTDOOR STORAGE AND, AND WHATNOT. THAT'S THAT'S BEEN THERE FOR SOME TIME. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR CINDY SEEING NONE. THERE WAS A LOT. THERE WAS A FEW YEARS AGO THEY DID NOT. THERE WAS ANOTHER MICROBREWERY DOWN THE ROAD AT ONE TIME ON US. ONE, IT'S BEEN THE INDIAN RIVER LAGOON BREWERY WAS AT JACKSON STREET, AND US ONE, PROBABLY 15 TO 20 YEARS AGO. IT WAS THE FIRST MICROBREWERY WE HAD IN THE CITY. IT'S BEEN CLOSED FOR QUITE SOME TIME, BUT THAT'S THE ONE. YOU'RE REFERRING TO. ALCOHOL THERE, IF I REMEMBER RIGHT. NO, IT WAS NOT. IT WAS. IT WAS JUST MORE OF A MANUFACTURING BREWERY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MISS DITTMER? SEEING NONE. THIS IS A QUASI JUDICIAL HEARING. DO WE HAVE ANY DISCLOSURES? I KNOW THAT I HAD BEEN THE CRA CHAIR, LISA HERENDEEN. SHE MAY HAVE. I THINK SHE'S THE REALTOR ON THIS.
SHE REACHED OUT TO ME AFTER THE PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING. SO I HAD THAT. AND THE OTHER MR. HERENDEEN CALLED ME. MR. HARRADINE CALLED YOU? YEAH. I ATTENDED THE DOWNTOWN CRA MEETING. I WAS THERE FOR THE DISCUSSION AND I TALKED WITH THE HERODIANS. MA'AM, I GOT A PHONE CALL FROM MR. HARRADINE NOVEMBER 7TH AT 1129, AND I RETURNED THAT CALL A LITTLE BIT LATER, AND WE JUST DISCUSSED THAT PLANNING AND ZONING MEETING AND HIS INTENTION WITH THE PROPERTY. OKAY. ANYBODY ELSE SEEING IF THERE WAS A LENGTHY EMAIL THAT WAS SENT TO US, OR WAS THAT IN ONE OF OUR PACKAGES, THE APPLICANT, I BELIEVE, SENT YOU AN EMAIL. SO WE GOT AN EMAIL. NOBODY CALLED ME. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. PERFECT. ALL RIGHT. SO NOW WE DID THAT.
WE'LL OPEN THE PUBLIC HEARING. WE'VE GOT ONE, TWO, THREE. I'VE GOT FOUR SPEAKER SHEETS. I THINK TWO OF THEM ARE FROM THE APPLICANT AND TWO ARE FROM THE HERODIANS. DID YOU ARE YOU GUYS HERE FOR QUESTIONS OR DOES SOMEBODY WANT TO COME UP AND TALK BETWEEN THE TWO PARTIES? YOU SHOULD PROBABLY HEAR. YOU SHOULD PROBABLY HEAR FROM THE PROJECT APPLICANT. FIRST START WITH APPLICANT. YEAH. LET'S GO WITH THE APPLICANT. TIMOTHY FOWLER. FOLLOWED BY. EIM SOLUTIONS. HELLO. HEY GOOD. GOOD EVENING I'M TIMOTHY FOWLER, A RETIRED AIR FORCE COLONEL, AIRCRAFT MAINTENANCE OFFICER. AND IF YOU'RE WONDERING ABOUT WHAT THE NAME REDTAIL FOR IS, IT WAS MY CALLSIGN AT BALAD AIR BASE, IRAQ. I HAVE 28 YEARS OF SERVICE IN THOSE 13 MONTHS AT BALAD, WITH BY FAR THE MOST IMPORTANT. BALAD AIR BASE WAS DESIGNATED TO THREE 32ND AIR EXPEDITIONARY WING, WHICH WAS DERIVED FROM THE THREE 32ND FIGHTER GROUP FROM WORLD WAR TWO, WHICH WAS THE TUSKEGEE AIRMEN THAT FLEW P-40S, P-47S, P-51S, AND THEIR JOB WAS TO PROTECT BOMBERS, BOMBERS GOING INTO GERMANY. AND THEY DID IT BETTER THAN ANYBODY ELSE EVER COULD. THEY PAINTED THEIR TAILS BRIGHT RED SO THAT THE BOMBER TROOPS THAT WERE IN THE BOMBERS KNEW WHO WAS DOING THEIR ESCORT. WHEN WE BECAME THE THREE 32ND AIR EXPEDITIONARY WING AT BELARUS, VERY SIMILAR. AND WHY WE WERE DESIGNATED THAT OUR JOB AT BALAD WAS TO PROTECT SOLDIERS. WE WERE WE WERE WE WERE DOING A LOT OF MANEUVERING ON THE GROUND, ALLOWED A HOUSE TO HOUSE AND BLOCK TO BLOCK FIGHTING. AND WHEN SOLDIERS NEEDED THAT AIRCRAFT OVERHEAD AND A BOMB ON TARGET, WE MADE SURE THAT AT THAT HAPPENED, WHEN THE ENEMY DIES, THEY DIE ON TIME. SO THE REASON FOR RED TAIL FOR THAT'S THE BACKGROUND, THAT'S THE HISTORY OF IT. I WILL SAY ONE MORE THING THAT. THE TUSKEGEE AIRMEN IN WORLD WAR TWO WERE ALL AFRICAN
[02:20:05]
AMERICAN. YOU KNOW, THE CIVIL WAR ENDED SLAVERY IN 1865. IT TOOK TILL 1965 TO END SEGREGATION. AND IN WORLD WAR TWO WE WERE SEGREGATED. BUT LUCKILY THE MILITARY ENDED SEGREGATION IN 1948. I TELL YOU THAT BECAUSE IT'S A PART OF OUR HISTORY, IT'S NOT A GOOD PART OF OUR HISTORY. BUT IN THIS ESTABLISHMENT, THIS BUSINESS, WHEN PEOPLE WANT TO UNDERSTAND WHAT IT'S ALL ABOUT, THEY WILL LEARN THIS BY OSMOSIS. THEY WILL JUST HAPPEN, JUST LIKE IT HAPPENED TO ME. SO I AM A TUSKEGEE AIRMAN, AND SO ARE THOUSANDS OF OTHERS THAT THAT PASS THROUGH BALAD AIR BASE IN COMBAT. SO THAT'S WHAT IT IS. I THINK YOU YOU KNOW, ONCE THEY SAID IT A COUPLE OF TIMES, WE DON'T HAVE A FULL KITCHEN. OUR WE PLAN WE HAVE A VERY NICE HIGH END BRICK OVEN PIZZA. AND WE'RE GOING TO MAKE HIGH END, HIGH QUALITY PIZZAS AND HIGH QUALITY BEER IN THE BACK END. THE REST WE DON'T HAVE A KITCHEN. WE JUST HAVE. THAT'S IT. THE ONLY THING WE'RE GOING TO BE COOKING THAT GOES INSIDE A BRICK OVEN. IT'S NOT A BIG RESTAURANT, SO I WANT TO ALLEVIATE THAT. IT'S NOT LIKE THAT. IT IS INTENDED TO BE A GATHERING PLACE FOR PEOPLE TO COME. AND AND OUR GOAL IS TO KEEP OUR PRICES LOW. MATTER OF FACT. YEAH. KEEP WE'LL KEEP THE FOOD PRICES LOW. AND THAT BECAUSE OF THAT HAS DRIVES US INTO THIS MICROBREWERY. BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO STAND I DON'T WANT TO STAND HERE AND SAY THAT I CAN MAKE SURE THAT 50% OF MY REVENUE IS OUT OF POCKET, WHICH WOULD MAKE US A BREWPUB. RIGHT? I DON'T KNOW THAT I CAN DO THAT. SO WE'RE GOING THROUGH ALL OF THIS TO GET TO A MICROBREWERY.ONE OTHER THING. YOU KNOW, WE WE PUT AN OFFER IN ON THIS ON THE PROPERTY IN JUNE. WE MET WITH THE CITY COUNCIL IN JULY. IT'S NOW DECEMBER. THE SELLER'S PROPERTY HAS BEEN BEEN TIED UP FOR ALL THIS TIME. AND AND FROM THE VERY BEGINNING WHEN WE STARTED THIS PROJECT, WE ALWAYS HAD GOOD FEEDBACK FROM THE CITY PLANNERS THAT THIS WAS SOMETHING THAT WAS VIABLE. THAT WOULD HAPPEN IN, IN MELBOURNE. RIGHT. AND BECAUSE OF THAT, I'VE MADE A SUBSTANTIAL INVESTMENT THAT IF YOU TURN IT DOWN TONIGHT AND I ASK YOU IF YOUR INTENT IS TO TURN IT DOWN, DO IT TONIGHT SO THAT I CAN STOP THE BLEEDING, BUT I HAVE I WILL I WILL LOSE A SUBSTANTIAL SUM. AND IF I DO, I DON'T CARE, BECAUSE I WAS GOING TO GIVE THIS MY BEST CHANCE, MY BEST TRY TO TRY AND MAKE THIS HAPPEN. AND IF IT IF IT'S NOT GOING TO HAPPEN, THEN I CAN LOOK IN THE MIRROR AND KNOW THAT I DID WHAT I COULD DO. BUT THANK YOU. AND I'LL TAKE ANY QUESTIONS IF YOU HAVE MAYOR. GO AHEAD SIR. SO MY NAME IS DAVE NEWMAN. I'M THE REPRESENTATIVE FOR YOUR AREA WHERE THIS WOULD BE. AND SO FIRST OF ALL, DO YOU HAVE THERE'S SOME GREAT PLANS IN HERE. YOU DON'T HAPPEN TO HAVE ANY RENDERINGS FOR SECOND READING OR ANYTHING LIKE THAT OF WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE FOR IT'LL GO WE HAVE TO. ONE OF THE CONDITIONS IS THE AGRICULTURAL AND HISTORICAL BOARD. YEAH, YEAH. AND SO WE HAVE TO GET THE WE HAVE TO GET APPROVAL FROM THEM AS WELL. AND RIGHT NOW OUR ARCHITECT IS WORKING ON THAT. LIKE HE SAID, WE'RE TRYING TO STOP THE BLEEDING. SO. OH SURE. NO I GET THAT. YEAH. OH NO. I'M JUST CURIOUS WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE. LET ME IT IS A OKAY. IT'S GOING TO BE A IT'S A STEEL BUILDING RIGHT, RIGHT. GOING UP A STEEL BUILDING. BUT AGAIN WITH THE HA WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO PUT SOME KIND OF FACINGS ON IT TO MAKE IT NOT LOOK LIKE JUST LIKE A STEEL BUILDING. BUT, BUT THE INSIDE IS GOING TO HAVE A CONCRETE FLOOR, RIGHT. THE INTERIOR WALLS ARE JUST PAINTED. YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT IT'S NOT A FANCY RESTAURANT. IT'S A BREWERY. IT'S A BREWERY AND MICROBREWERY. AND SO THAT'S IT.
RIGHT. AND I KNOW AND I GET, I GET THAT I WAS AGAIN WANT, WANTED TO HAVE AN IDEA OF THAT FOR A SECOND IF POSSIBLE. BUT LET ME BE FRANK BECAUSE I CAN I CAN HEAR THE THE APPREHENSION AND CONCERN IN YOUR VOICE. I WHOLEHEARTEDLY SUPPORT YOUR PROJECT. I THINK YOU'RE DOING RIGHT BY OUR CITY. I APOLOGIZE THAT YOU'VE HAD THAT BECAUSE OF THIS SPLIT DECISION AT PLANNING AND ZONING THAT'S MADE YOU FEEL THIS CONCERN. I WANT YOU TO KNOW, I DO BELIEVE THAT YOU ARE TRYING TO ADD A NET BENEFIT WITH THIS. I THINK THIS WOULD BE FANTASTIC FOR OUR AREA. YOU HAVE MY FULL SUPPORT. LIKE I SAID, I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE, LIKE I SAID, I WOULD JUST LIKE TO SEE WHAT IT LOOKS LIKE. AND I THINK THIS IS SOMETHING THAT'S A NET POSITIVE. SO THANK YOU GUYS FOR YOUR TIME AND YOUR PATIENCE AND THAT OF THE LANDOWNER. BUT I WOULD I WOULD LOVE TO VOTE TO HAVE THIS MOVE FORWARD. BUT I'LL GO FOR EVERYBODY ELSE. MISS HANLEY, WHAT TYPE OF EXPERIENCE DO YOU HAVE IN THE RESTAURANT BUSINESS? I'VE DONE RESTAURANTS FOR 13 YEARS. I'VE GRAND OPENED. I WAS WORKING FOR A COMPANY NAMED COOKOUT, AND SO I STARTED THERE AND I DID ALL. I TRAVELED ALL ACROSS THE FOUR DIFFERENT STATES, OPENED ALL THEIR STORES,
[02:25:02]
AND THEN I RAN THEIR FLAGSHIP STORE FOR THE LAST TEN YEARS AND OUR LIKE, WE SOLD $7.WHERE'S THE FLAGSHIP? IT'S A BURGER, TWO SIDES AND A DRINK. AND OUR ANNUAL REVENUE WAS 6.5 MILLION SELLING $7 ITEMS. SO I'M PRETTY GOOD AT MAKING SURE THAT WE KEEP SOMETHING AFFORDABLE, MAKING SURE THAT YOU'RE CONNECTING WITH THE CUSTOMERS, CUSTOMER SERVICE, TRAINING, EMPLOYEES, TRAINING FRONT OF HOUSE, DEVELOPING PEOPLE. AND THE MAIN REASON WHY I WANT TO OPEN A BUSINESS IS WHEN I STARTED WORKING FOR COOKOUT, I WAS MAKING $7.25 AN HOUR GOING TO SCHOOL FOR AN ENGINEERING DEGREE. I ENDED UP LEAVING MY ENGINEERING DEGREE TO DO THIS, AND I BY THE TIME I LEFT WORKING FOR COOKOUT, I WAS MAKING ALMOST A QUARTER MILLION DOLLARS A YEAR. AND I GAVE IT UP TO DO THIS BECAUSE I WANT TO GIVE THAT OPPORTUNITY TO OTHER PEOPLE. I WANT TO SHOW PEOPLE THAT THEY CAN WORK HARD AND MOVE UP INTO LEADERSHIP ROLES AND THAT, AND I REALLY BELIEVE THAT THAT'S SOMETHING YOU CAN GIVE BACK TO YOUR COMMUNITY.
ALL RIGHT. WHERE'S THE FLAGSHIP STORE COOKOUT? LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY. YEAH, BUT CAN I ASK ANOTHER QUESTION? WHEN SHE TOOK IT OVER, IT WAS IT WAS 3 MILLION IN SALES. OKAY. GO AHEAD. MA'AM, WHY DID YOU PICK WHY DID YOU PICK THAT LOCATION? LEXINGTON, KENTUCKY. OR THIS THIS LOCATION? WE'VE BEEN WE ARE CURRENTLY WE LIVE IN PALM BAY, BUT CLOSE TO THE MELBOURNE AREA. AND THERE'S BEEN ALL OF OUR NEIGHBORS THAT ARE IN OUR NEIGHBORHOOD COMPLAIN THERE'S NOTHING THAT THEY CAN BRING THE FAMILY TO TO GATHER. THAT'S THAT'S NOT ALL THE WAY O'GALLEY OR WHAT WE'RE INTERCOASTAL IS AND THEY'RE DRIVING TO INTERCOASTAL MULTIPLE TIMES A WEEK TO DO WHAT WE WANT TO DO. AND SO WE WE SAW THAT IT WOULD BE VIABLE. THERE'S ALL THREE OF THE BREWERIES WITH HILL AND BLAZE'S INTERCOASTAL AND, AND WE WOULD BE THE THIRD ONE THAT WOULD BE ALONG US ONE RIGHT IN THAT AREA. AND THEY'RE BOTH VERY SUCCESSFUL. AND THE BREWERY THAT YOU TALKED ABOUT THAT HAD CLOSED DOWN ABOUT 15 YEARS AGO. IT WAS A PRODUCTION FACILITY THAT WAS LOCATED THERE, AND THEY ACTUALLY NEEDED TO MOVE THAT SPACE, I BELIEVE WAS 11,000FT■!S, AND THEY WERE DOING SO WELL IN THERE WITH THEIR DISTRIBUTION THAT THEY MOVED UP TO COCOA AND COMBINED WITH ANOTHER BREWERY IN A 60,000 SQUARE FOOT FACILITY, IF I IF I'M NOT MISTAKEN. SO THEY DIDN'T GO OUT OF BUSINESS. I'VE HEARD DIFFERENT STORIES, SO I DON'T YEAH, THAT'S WHAT I HEARD IS THAT THEY COMBINED WITH A COUPLE DIFFERENT BREWERIES AND TO A BIGGER FACILITY. OKAY. MISS KENNEDY, MA'AM. GO AHEAD. HI, HOW ARE YOU? I'M EXCITED ABOUT THIS PROJECT, ACTUALLY, SO. AND I TOO AM SORRY ABOUT YOUR EXPERIENCE WITH PLANNING AND ZONING, BUT HOW MANY EMPLOYEES DO YOU PLAN ON EMPLOYING? SO STARTING OUT, I'D LIKE TO START WITH ANYWHERE BETWEEN 15 AND 20 TOTAL. BUT WHEN I STARTED AT WHEN I STARTED GROWING MY PREVIOUS BUSINESS, I STARTED WITH 25 EMPLOYEES AND WAS ABLE TO GROW IT TO WHEN I LEFT. I THINK I HAD 65 EMPLOYEES AND THEN TEN MANAGERS ON TOP OF IT, AND I TRAINED LIKE GM'S AND DISTRICT MANAGERS OUT OF THAT STORE. WE WOULD LIKE TO EVENTUALLY EXPAND AND BUILD THE BRAND ALL OVER FLORIDA. SO THAT WOULD BE OPPORTUNITIES FOR EMPLOYEES TO MOVE UP INTO MANAGEMENT, INTO DISTRICT MANAGER ROLES, INTO DIFFERENT LOCATIONS. I MEAN, THAT'S THE DREAM PRETTY MUCH. BUT I JUST KNOW THAT IF YOU DEVELOP IN PEOPLE, YOU CAN NEVER GO WRONG. YEAH, YEAH, ACTUALLY GO AHEAD, GO AHEAD, MR. SMITH. AND THEN MR. GOOD EVENING, COLONEL FOWLER. I ALSO WAS DEPLOYED TO BALAD. THAT WAS MY FIRST DEPLOYMENT. I WAS WITH THE COMBINED JOINT SPECIAL OPS AIR COMPONENT, THE SECRET SQUIRRELS OVER THERE. WE OPENED THE JSOC. YEP. JSOC. YEP, YEP, I WAS THERE. SO NOW REMEMBER, I STILL HAVE MY T SHIRT FOR, YOU KNOW, INCOMING, INCOMING. YOU KNOW, THAT WAS WHAT I WAS KNOWN FOR. YEAH, BUT A COUPLE OF THINGS. I'M REALLY EXCITED ABOUT THIS. I DO I DO A LOT OF COMMUNITY SERVICE DOWN IN THAT AREA AND A COUPLE OF THINGS. I'M ALSO INVOLVED WITH THE TUSKEGEE AIRMEN INCORPORATED, THE LOCAL CHAPTER THAT'S HERE. I DON'T KNOW IF YOU HAD ANY COMMUNICATION WITH THEM HERE.
NO, BUT I'M SURE THEY'RE GOING TO WANT TO ABSOLUTELY FIND OUT SOME MORE INFORMATION ABOUT THIS. THAT WAS ONE OF MY QUESTIONS. AND THEN I'M ALSO JUST LIKE MY FELLOW COUNCILMEN AND WOMEN HERE, YOU KNOW, REALLY WANT TO ENCOURAGE YOU AND THANK YOU FOR BEING CONSISTENT AND PERSISTENT IN, IN PURSUING THIS, BECAUSE THAT CORRIDOR I LOVE I'M GLAD THAT WAS A GREAT QUESTION. LIKE, WHY THIS LOCATION? WHY THIS AREA? THERE ARE A COUPLE OF THINGS THAT ARE SORT OF PERCOLATING IN THIS AREA, AND I THINK THIS IS A GREAT OPPORTUNITY TO HAVE TWO THINGS THAT PEOPLE CAN REALLY ENJOY. WE'RE MISSING PIECES SINCE WE DON'T HAVE THE PIZZA HERE IN DOWNTOWN MELBOURNE ANYMORE. RIGHT. AND THEN AND YOU CAN NEVER REALLY GO WRONG WITH, WITH MICROBREWERY. SO YEAH. THANK YOU. OKAY. AND MR. LARUSSO, YOU'RE GOING TO YOU'RE GOING TO WALK THROUGH THIS TONIGHT. I MEAN, I REALLY BELIEVE THAT YOU ARE, BUT I'M GOING TO PUT A SHOUT OUT TO SOMEBODY WHO ELSE IS IN THIS AUDIENCE RIGHT HERE. AND IF YOU
[02:30:01]
HAVEN'T ALREADY CONTACTED YOUR CISCO REPRESENTATIVE, THAT'S YOUR GUY RIGHT THERE. YEAH.MICHAEL HERNANDEZ, BUY YOUR FOOD FROM HIM. WE HAVE HIS CARD. I WAS A LITTLE NERVOUS. I WAS LIKE, WELL, LET'S GET THROUGH THIS BEFORE WE GET I KNOW MY DISTRIBUTOR YEARS. HE'S HE'S A TRUE PROFESSIONAL. YEAH. WE HAVE WE HAVE HIS INFORMATION. GOOD. WE WANTED TO GET THROUGH THIS. ALL RIGHT. OKAY. AND REAL QUICK, MA'AM, IF YOU DON'T MIND, JUST FOR THE RECORD, WHAT'S YOUR NAME? CHELSEA WOODARD. SORRY, CHELSEA WOODARD. WE'RE JUST GOING TO ADD IT ON THERE.
HIS DAUGHTER. BUT I'M MARRIED OKAY. SO. ALL RIGHT. WELL THANK YOU. NEXT I'M SOLUTIONS I AM SOLUTIONS. IS THERE AN I AM SOLUTIONS OKAY. FOLLOWED BY MARK HARRADINE. THANK YOU GUYS I HAVE TO SAY THAT IT'S AMAZING. I'M LOOKING FORWARD TO IT. THE PLACE IS RIGHT ACROSS THE STREET FROM MY OFFICE. SOME PLACE TO EAT, RIGHT? VERY COOL. WE'VE BEEN WORKING. I THINK YOU GUYS KNOW THAT WE WORKED. WE? MY WIFE IS ON A LOT OF THE BOARDS HERE, AND WE'VE WORKED HARD FOR MANY, MANY YEARS TO GET THE BLIGHTED SECTION OF OF SOUTH CORRIDOR CHANGED. WE WERE A PART OF THE COMMITTEE THAT GAVE US THE NEW ARCHWAY THAT OUR DESIGN TEAM WITH THE ARCHITECTS REDESIGNED THAT AND GOT THAT TO BUDGET SO THAT YOU HAVE THAT NICE ARCHWAY AT THE ENTRANCE AND THEN ALL THE OTHER ONES THAT WE HAVE DIFFERENT AREAS. SO WE'VE BEEN INVOLVED WITH THE COMMUNITY TRYING TO GET THIS AREA TO GROW AND AND MATURE. AND I THINK THAT WHAT YOU'RE SEEING RIGHT HERE IS ONE BUSINESS THAT IS GOING OUT THERE ON A LIMB. AND I THANK YOU FOR YOUR SERVICES AND YOUR MILITARY TIME. IT'S A BEAUTIFUL THING TO SEE SOMEBODY'S HEART COME OUT LIKE THAT, AND THAT'S A LOVELY THING. AND SO IF YOU GUYS DON'T PASS THIS AND I THINK I SEE A LOT OF PEOPLE SAYING, YES, IT WOULD BE A SAD DAY FOR THE COMMUNITY BECAUSE THIS IS GOING TO HELP THAT AREA AND GIVE OUR CORRIDOR. WE'RE GETTING THE STREETS, THE STREETSCAPE NOW AND WE'RE GOING TO SEE A LOT OF IMPROVEMENTS. I JUST DON'T WANT TO BE KNOWN AS MELBOURNE. THE HARBOR CITY, NOT THE OTHER CITY, RIGHT. BECAUSE THAT AREA IS NOTORIOUS FOR THE, THE, THE SEEDINESS AND THE CRIMES AND ALL THE OTHER THINGS THAT I'VE HAD IN MY PROPERTY, I FIND IT ON MY LOTS ALL OVER THE PLACE OVER THERE. SO WE WANT TO GET THAT OUT OF HERE. WE WANT TO SEE THE GROWTH, WE WANT TO SEE THE VITAL AND REVITALIZE IT. LIKE WHAT YOU'VE SEEN IN A LOT OF OTHER CITIES ALONG THE COASTLINE. AS YOU GO FURTHER SOUTH, THEY'VE TAKEN THESE BLIGHTED AREAS AND IMPROVED THEM. BEAUTIFUL WHAT THEY'VE BEEN DOING. SO LET'S KEEP THAT PACE AND LET'S LET'S MAKE THIS SOMETHING THAT IS THE CITY WILL BE ABLE TO LOOK AT AND SAY, AS WE GET THOSE BLIGHTED PROPERTIES, THIS ONE SORRY, WITH IT'S A PIECE OF JUNK. WE GOT TO TAKE THAT PROPERTY AND SCRAPE IT AND PUT SOMETHING NICE IN THERE AND MAKE IT LOOK GOOD. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. MARK HARRADINE FOLLOWED BY LISA HARRADINE. ON MY WARMTH.
LEFT EARLIER. HI. GOOD EVENING. MARK HARRADINE 233 EAST NEW HAVEN AVENUE. HAVE A PREPARED STATEMENT. MY NAME IS MARK HARRADINE. I AM WITH REAL ESTATE INC AS A REAL ESTATE AGENT FOR BOTH RESIDENTIAL AND COMMERCIAL PROPERTY. OUR FIRM REPRESENTS THE SELLER OF THE PROPERTY AT 2808 SOUTH HARBOR CITY BOULEVARD, WHERE THE RED TAIL FOR BREWERY AND BRICK OVEN PIZZA PROJECT ARE PROPOSED. I'M HERE TONIGHT TO STRONGLY ASK FOR YOUR UNANIMOUS APPROVAL.
APPROVAL FOR THE PROJECT. OVER THE PAST SEVERAL MONTHS, I'VE HAD THE PLEASURE OF MEETING REGULARLY AT THE SITE WITH THE DEVELOPER, CHELSEA WOODARD, AND HER FATHER, TIMOTHY FOWLER, WHO YOU HEARD EARLIER, ALONG WITH THEIR ENGINEERS, CONTRACTORS AND OTHER PROFESSIONALS.
CHELSEA BRINGS REAL WORLD HOSPITALITY EXPERIENCE AND A CLEAR VISION FOR A SUCCESSFUL BREWERY AND RESTAURANT. TIMOTHY ADDS ENGINEERING EXPERTISE AND A STEADY AND PRACTICAL PERSPECTIVE. TOGETHER, THEY'VE SHOWN NOTHING BUT COMMITMENT, COMMITMENT TO THE PROJECT AND PROFESSIONALISM. THEY WORKED HAND IN HAND WITH CITY STAFF INCLUDING CHERYL DEAN AND CINDY DITTMER, WHO'S IN THE AUDIENCE TONIGHT TO ENSURE EVERY ASPECT OF THE PROJECT ALIGNS WITH THE DOWNTOWN SOUTH EXPANSION PLAN. THEIR CONCEPT PERFECTLY FITS THE CITY'S GOALS FOR ECONOMIC REVITALIZATION AND DESIGN STANDARDS, AS WELL AS COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT. AS YOU HEARD EARLIER, THE NAME RED TAIL ITSELF HONORS AFRICAN AMERICAN VETERANS AND THE LEGACY OF THE TUSKEGEE AIRMEN, A GOOD CONNECTION TO MELBOURNE'S HISTORY AND A SENSE OF COMMUNITY PRIDE. THE PROJECT IS ABOUT MORE THAN GREAT FOOD AND CRAFT BEER. IT'S ABOUT TRANSFORMING AN UNDERUTILIZED PROPERTY INTO ANOTHER VIBRANT DESTINATION A PLACE WHERE FAMILIES, RESIDENTS AND VISITORS CAN GATHER, CELEBRATE THE LOCAL HERITAGE, STRENGTHEN OUR DOWNTOWN ECONOMY, ENJOY CAMARADERIE WITH FRIENDS. THE SITE IS ALREADY WITHIN THE DESIGNATED DOWNTOWN CRA DISTRICT AND THE SOUTH EXPANSION OF MELBOURNE, AND HAS BEEN A PLACE AND HAS BEEN IN PLACE FOR MORE THAN A DECADE. THIS PROJECT FULLY COMPLIES WITH THE CITY'S OWN PLAN FOR GROWTH BY EVERY OBJECTIVE MEASURE ECONOMIC IMPACT DESIGN, COMPREHENSIVE PLAN COMMUNITY VALUE. REDTAIL BREWERY MEETS AND EXCEEDS THE STANDARDS FOR
[02:35:01]
APPROVAL. I'M NOT JUST SAYING THIS AS A REAL ESTATE PROFESSIONAL, BUT AS SOMEONE WHO HAS SERVED ON BOTH THE DESIGN COMMITTEE THAT BILL ALLUDED TO EARLIER FOR MELBOURNE MAIN STREET AND ATTENDED MANY CRA MEETINGS, OF WHICH MY WIFE, LISA, YOU'LL HEAR FROM BRIEFLY IN A MOMENT, IS THE IS THE CHAIR OF. THIS IS EXACTLY THE KIND OF PROJECT THAT WE HAVE WAITED NOT ONLY YEARS, BUT DECADES, FOR. IT IS ONE THAT WILL REMOVE BLIGHT. IT WILL CREATE AN INVITE OTHER INVESTMENTS AND ADD TO A SENSE OF PLACE ON BEHALF OF OUR FIRM AND IN THE MANY AND IN MANY IN THE COMMUNITY WHO SUPPORT THIS EFFORT, I RESPECTFULLY ASK THAT YOU APPROVE THE RED TAIL FORT BREWERY IN BRICK OVEN PIZZERIA. IT WILL BRING NEW ENERGY, JOBS AND MORE PRIDE TO DOWNTOWN AND IT DESERVES YOUR UNANIMOUS SUPPORT. THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME, SERVICE AND THOUGHTFUL CONSIDERATION. THANK YOU. THANK YOU AND LISA. AND THEN FOLLOWED BY LAST SPEAKER, JOSEPH MCNEIL. GOOD EVENING. I'M WEARING TWO HATS TONIGHT. THE FIRST, OF COURSE, IS MY BROKERAGE REPRESENTS THE SELLER. SO I HAVE TO DISCLOSE THAT. SECOND IS AS A MEMBER OF THE CRA. AND I GUESS I JUST NEED TO START OFF BY SAYING, I'M JUST SO EXCITED ABOUT THIS PROJECT BECAUSE AND IF IT DOES EVER COME BEFORE CRA ADVISORY BEFORE IT CLOSES, I WOULD OBVIOUSLY HAVE TO ABSTAIN FROM VOTING. BUT PERSONALLY, I'M EXTREMELY EXCITED. YOU KNOW, IF YOU STAND OUT IN THIS PROPERTY AND YOU DO A 360 AND YOU LOOK AROUND, IT'S ALL BLIGHT. I MEAN, RIGHT NOW THERE'S I THINK FOUR PROPERTIES LISTED RIGHT THERE FOR SALE.AND THE PROBLEM IS SOME OF IT IS THE ZONING. SO JUST SO YOU ALL ARE AWARE, MOST OF THAT AREA WAS ZONED C THREE WHEN WE DID THE REZONING SEVERAL YEARS AGO. THE REMAINING PROPERTIES GRANDFATHERED IN AS C TWO. IT CREATES A ZONING ISSUE THAT PUTS PROPERTIES IN THE MIDDLE.
YOU KNOW, THERE'S BEEN A LOT OF TALK ABOUT HOW THEY NEED THE CONDITIONAL USE TO SERVE ALCOHOL. BUT BELIEVE IT OR NOT, IF THEY WANTED TO JUST SERVE PIZZA, THEY CAN'T DO THAT EITHER. SO IT MADE IT VERY, VERY DIFFICULT TO. WE HAD TONS OF INTEREST ON THIS PROPERTY, BUT THE KINDS OF BUSINESSES THAT COULD ACTUALLY FIT INTO THE MOLD FOR THAT PARTICULAR AREA, IT'S REALLY TOUGH AND IT'S TOUGH TO TACKLE THAT AND TO TACKLE THE BLIGHT AND THE REDEVELOPMENT THAT WE'RE SEEKING AS A CRA. I MEAN, THIS PROJECT IS LITERALLY I GET CHILLS BECAUSE IT'S EXACTLY THE KIND OF PROJECT THAT WE NEED BACK THERE, NOT TO MENTION THE FACT THAT BREWERIES ARE KNOWN. IF YOU STUDY THAT THEY ARE A CATALYST FOR ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT. SO I REALLY FEEL THAT ONCE THIS BREWERY GOES IN, YOU'RE GOING TO SEE THOSE OTHER PROPERTIES IMMEDIATELY GO TO CONTRACT, YOU'RE GOING TO SEE SOME REALLY NICE REDEVELOPMENT OPTIONS THAT ARE GOING TO COME THERE. AND I JUST HAVE TO SAY IT WAS DEFLATING TO HEAR PLANNING AND ZONING SHOOT THIS DOWN, BECAUSE WE WERE REALLY WORRIED THAT THEY WERE GOING TO JUST BE SO FRUSTRATED AND GIVE UP. BUT THEY DO. THEY HAVE A SIGNIFICANT INVESTMENT SETTLED, AND I WAS VERY HAPPY TO HEAR THE ATTORNEY SAY THAT. IT'S NOT A GOOD REASON TO VOTE THIS DOWN FOR ANY REASON, FOR PERSONAL REASONS, BECAUSE THAT'S PRETTY MUCH WHAT PLANNING AND ZONING DID. THE TWO FOLKS THAT VOTED AGAINST IT BASICALLY SAID IT WAS PERSONAL, AND THAT WE HAD FOUR RESTAURANTS OR BARS ALREADY THERE, WHICH WE DON'T. SO I'M NOT REALLY SURE WHERE THAT CAME FROM. BUT REGARDLESS, WE'RE HERE NOW. I WAS HOPING THAT EVERYBODY WOULD BE AS EXCITED AS IT SEEMS LIKE YOU GUYS ARE, BECAUSE WE'RE SUPER EXCITED ABOUT THIS PROJECT AND IT'S A REAL WIN FOR THE CITY. THANK YOU MAYOR. THANK YOU LISA. SO YOU BROUGHT UP SOMETHING THAT I THINK HAS BEEN BROUGHT UP BEFORE. YOU GOT THIS WHOLE C3 VERSUS C2. AND I'VE HAD SOME SIDEBAR CONVERSATIONS ABOUT SOMETHING, I GUESS, THAT USED TO EXIST THAT WAS AN INTEGRATED COMMERCIAL EDGE DEVELOPMENT TO WHERE YOU COULD SORT OF OPERATE ANY ONE OF THOSE THINGS. SO HAS THAT BEEN SOMETHING I'VE TALKED ABOUT AT THE ADVISORY BOARD LEVEL? WE'VE TALKED ABOUT IT BRIEFLY. I KNOW THAT, AND THE STAFF CAN ELABORATE ON THAT MORE. BUT COMMERCIAL EDGE IS ONLY ALLOWED ON THAT SIDE OF US ONE AND BETWEEN THE RAILROAD TRACKS. BUT IT WOULD ALSO HAVE TO BE A SPECIFIC CHANGE. YOU NEED A FULL ACRE TO MAKE ANY CHANGE OR APPLICATION. SO AND IT'S MOSTLY BEING USED IN THE EAU GALLIE AREA WITH WHAT I'VE HEARD, A LOT OF SUCCESS. CINDY CAN PROBABLY SPEAK TO THAT A LITTLE BIT MORE THAN I CAN, BUT YES, WE REALLY DO NEED SOME MORE FLEXIBLE ZONING, I THINK TO MAKE SOME THINGS HAPPEN INSTEAD OF HAVING TO JUST LOOK AT EVERY SINGLE PARCEL AS A CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL, WHICH IS AGAIN, I DON'T KNOW WHAT EXACTLY IS GOING TO HAPPEN IN THE FUTURE AFTER THIS IS APPROVED AND WHO'S GOING TO COME IN. BUT I CERTAINLY HOPE THAT, YOU KNOW, AS SOME OF THESE REQUESTS COME TO COUNCIL, THAT YOU GUYS KEEP AN OPEN MIND, BECAUSE WE REALLY DO WANT TO SEE A LOT OF REDEVELOPMENT.
FLEXIBLE ZONE. OKAY. THANK YOU. THANK YOU, MR. MCNEIL. AND MAYOR, WOULD YOU LIKE. OH, MA'AM. YEAH. I'M SORRY. GO AHEAD. JENNY, WOULD YOU LIKE CINDY TO SPEAK ON ZONING? YEAH, IF YOU'D LIKE TO. WOULD YOU LIKE SOMEBODY? LIKE. YEAH. I MEAN, YEAH. GO AHEAD. JUST TO CLARIFY A LITTLE, LITTLE BIT. SO THIS AREA IS SOUTH OF W.H. JACKSON STREET, IS ZONED C-2 COMMERCIAL. IT DOES ALLOW RESTAURANTS AND OFFICES AND ALL OF THOSE USES IN ADDITION TO SOME OF THE AUTOMOTIVE USES THAT HAVE BEEN THERE FOR SOME TIME. THAT'S WHY WE DID NOT REZONE C-3 ZONING ALL THE WAY DOWN SOUTH. US ONE THAT WAS VERY INTENTIONAL. WE HAD A
[02:40:01]
NUMBER OF WORKSHOPS BACK THEN WITH ALL OF THE PROPERTY OWNERS, AND DECIDED TO LEAVE IT AS C2.THE ZONING THAT WE HAVE IN O'GALLEY ACTUALLY ACTUALLY ALLOWS EVEN MORE INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL USES THAN WHAT YOU HAVE THERE. NOW, I DON'T KNOW THAT THAT'S THE BEST THING.
WHOLE SCALE FOR THE SOUTH US ONE CORRIDOR, BECAUSE YOU'RE GOING TO ALLOW MORE INTENSIVE COMMERCIAL USES THAT AREN'T ALWAYS THE PRETTIEST THINGS TO LOOK AT. PERHAPS. SO I THINK THAT THAT'S SOMETHING THAT WOULD HAVE TO HAVE FURTHER CONVERSATION BEFORE WE START DOWN ANY THOUGHT OF. WE JUST NEED TO GIVE EVERYTHING A NEW, MORE INTENSIVE ZONING DISTRICT.
RIGHT? SO I THINK MAYBE IT WOULD GO THE OTHER WAY, MAYBE NOT THE COMMERCIAL CONCENTRATION, BUT MAYBE A LITTLE BIT MORE OF THE I DON'T KNOW WHAT THE TERM WOULD BE MORE OF THE RESTAURANT, MORE OF THE LEISURE. SO RESTAURANTS COULD COULD BE ON EVERY PROPERTY IN THIS AREA. C2 ALLOWS RESTAURANTS, IT ALLOWS OFFICE, IT ALLOWS ALL OF THOSE USES THAT ARE LESS INTENSIVE. YOU KNOW, IT BUILDS ON ITSELF. THEN WHAT WAS THE ISSUE? I'M NOT NOT 100% SURE, BUT. THAT'S THE FIRST THAT I THAT I'VE HEARD THEIR CONCERN ABOUT. YOU CAN'T DO RESTAURANTS. THERE ARE SEVERAL RESTAURANTS THAT HAVE HAVE BEEN IN THE AREA.
RESTAURANTS HAVE PERMITTED USE IN C2. OKAY. AND UNDERSTAND OUR STAFF RECOMMENDATION IS APPROVAL OF THE ORDINANCE. SO I DON'T I'M NOT SURE IF OUR STAFF IS AWARE OF THE SITUATION. YEAH.
I MEAN OKAY, SO WE'RE DOING A CONDITIONAL USE BASED OFF OF I GUESS. SO THE CONDITIONAL USE, THERE'S TWO CONDITIONAL USES, ONES TO BE A MICROBREWERY AND ALSO THEN TO ALLOW CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL ON PREMISES. MR. FOWLER. OKAY. MR. FOWLER WAS EXPLAINING EARLIER IF THEY WERE GOING TO BE ABLE TO COMMIT TO DOING AT LEAST 50% OF THEIR SALES IN FOOD SALES, THEY COULD HAVE BEEN A RESTAURANT, THEY COULD HAVE BEEN A BREWPUB, THEY WOULDN'T BE IN THE PUBLIC HEARINGS. IN OUR CONVERSATIONS EARLY ON WITH THEM, THEY'RE CONCERNED THAT THEY'RE GOING TO BE ABLE TO MEET THAT FULL 50%. THAT'S THE DEFINITION WE HAVE IN CITY CODE FOR A RESTAURANT.
AND SO THEY WANTED TO BE CAUTIOUS AND MAKE SURE BECAUSE, YOU KNOW, GOOD YOU KNOW, GOOD CRAFT BREWERY IS, YOU KNOW, DOES COST A LITTLE BIT MORE. SO YOU'VE GOT TO BALANCE YOU KNOW WHAT WHAT'S YOUR INCOME SOURCE IS GOING TO BE. SO THAT'S THE WHOLE REASON THAT THEY'RE HERE IS TO GO AHEAD AND GET A CONDITIONAL USE. SO THEY DON'T HAVE TO FULFILL THAT 50%. AND SO THEY'RE GOING TO BE A MICROBREWERY. THEY'RE GOING TO HAVE THE ALLOWANCE FOR THE CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES OF BEER AND WINE ONLY. AND THEY DON'T THEN HAVE TO FULFILL THAT 50% FOOD SALES. OKAY. AND I'LL SAY, MR. SMITH, YOU'RE FAMILIAR WITH BUSINESS AS WELL. YOU DON'T HAVE TO WORRY ABOUT EVERY QUARTER WHETHER YOU'VE MET THAT GOAL OR NOT. RIGHT, RIGHT.
RIGHT. RIGHT, RIGHT. YEAH. YOU HAVE MORE FLEXIBILITY. YOU WANT IT TO HAPPEN, BUT YOU YOU MAY NOT. RIGHT. YEAH. YEAH. EXACTLY. EXACTLY. YES, SIR. YEAH. OKAY. MR. JOSEPH MCNEIL. HEY. THANK YOU, MR. DITTMER. YEAH. GOOD EVENING, COUNCIL, AND I APPRECIATE THE OPPORTUNITY TO SPEAK. ONE OF THE REASONS WHY I COME TO COUNCIL MEETINGS AND AND COME AND STAY IS TO LEARN OF WHAT WE ARE DOING. HAVING BEEN BORN AND RAISED IN THAT PARTICULAR AREA, I WELCOME THE AIRMAN'S INITIATIVE TO. FILL THAT VOID, THAT AREA, HAVING BEEN BORN AND RAISED THERE, HAS BEEN BLIGHTED FOR A NUMBER OF YEARS, NUMBER OF YEARS, AND THIS CAN BE AN ANCHOR TO THAT QUARTER. SO I REALLY, REALLY WOULD APPRECIATE IF YOU GUYS WOULD APPROVE THIS AND MAKE SURE THAT WE START THAT QUARTER AS BEING REVITALIZED AND BEING A VISION AS IT ONCE WAS. WE, THE CONCERNED CITIZENS, REALLY WOULD LIKE TO. WE GOT SOME PLANS THAT WE ARE GOING TO BE BRINGING BEFORE YOU. ALSO, WE GOT A TRAIL THAT WE WANTED TO IMPLEMENT. WE GOT THE THE HISTORIC AMERICAN LEGION 191 THAT WE WANT TO CHANGE SOME OF THE ATMOSPHERE ON. SO THIS WOULD, IN MY OPINION, WOULD HELP US GROW AND MOVE FORWARD IN THIS AREA. SO I DO APPRECIATE YOU PASSING THIS TONIGHT AND IN THE SECOND READING. THANK YOU VERY MUCH.
AND THANK YOU, MR. MCNEIL. YOU DEFINITELY ARE FROM THE AREA BORN AND RAISED. YEAH, I'M NOT
[02:45:04]
GOING TO ARGUE WITH THAT ONE RIGHT THERE. AND REAL QUICK. YOU THAT THAT THAT THE LAST SPEAKER I WILL SAY THIS IS A QUASI JUDICIAL ITEM. I KNOW THERE'S ALREADY DISCLOSURES MADE, BUT I WANT TO MAKE IT CLEAR. ON. 11 SEVEN 2025, MARK HARRADINE CALLED ME, JUST BRIEFLY ASKED ME TO SUPPORT PROJECT. WE DIDN'T REALLY TALK MUCH ABOUT IT, BUT HE WAS JUST PROBABLY IT WAS A MINUTE PHONE CALL. I JUST THAT'S MY THE ONLY DISCLOSURE. THERE'S NO OTHER DISCLOSURE THOUGH. CORRECT. ALL RIGHT. AND THE PUBLIC HEARING IS CLOSED. I'M GOING TO BRING IT BACK TO COUNCIL. MAYOR GO AHEAD. MOTION TO APPROVE ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2555. BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE STAFF MEMORANDUM. SECOND. OH, BOY.I'M EXCITED. WE ALL SECOND IT. HOLD ON. WE'RE ALL REALLY EXCITED. OKAY, WAIT A SECOND.
YOU HAD A SECOND A SECOND. YEAH, I THINK WE ALL SAID IT LIKE THE SAME EXACT TIME. HOLD ON.
BECAUSE I CAN DO THAT. PICK A NUMBER ONE. PICK A NUMBER 1 TO 10. THREE, TWO. IT WAS FIVE. GO AHEAD. I'M GONNA SAY ROCK, PAPER, SCISSORS. YOU'D LOSE THAT ONE. OKAY, SO WE HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THAT MOTION PASSES
[C.15. Ordinance No. 2025-56, The Office Cigar Lounge: (First Reading/Public Hearing) An ordinance granting a conditional use (CU2025-0008) to allow the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages on-premises, accessory to cigar sales, in a unit located on 0.20±-acre developed acres, zoned C-3 (Central Business District), located on the south side of West Eau Gallie Boulevard, east of Guava Avenue, and west of Highland Avenue (587 West Eau Gallie, Unit 103). (Owner - LJ Real Estate Holdings, LLC) (Applicant/Representative - Micah Rose) (P&Z Board - 11/6/2025)]
UNANIMOUSLY. THANK YOU. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 15. GOING TO BE ORDINANCE 20 2556. THANK YOU.MAYOR. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AS IT RELATES TO GENERAL ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005 DASH 120 BY GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW FOR THE SALE AND SERVICE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES FOR CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RETAIL CIGAR SHOP IN A 670 PLUS OR MINUS SQUARE FOOT UNIT LOCATED ON A 0.20 PLUS OR MINUS ACRE PROPERTY. LOCATED ZONED C THREE CENTRAL BUSINESS. LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST EAU GALLIE BOULEVARD, EAST OF GUAVA AVENUE AND WEST OF HIGHLAND AVENUE. 587 WEST EAU GALLIE BOULEVARD, PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, PROVIDING THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE GRANTED HEREIN MAY BE REVOKED BY THE CITY COUNCIL IF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARE NOT MET, PROVIDING THAT THE PROPERTY SHALL BE DESIGNATED ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BY THE SYMBOL C, C3, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. THANK YOU. REPORT ON THIS IS MISS DITTMER.
YES. THIS IS THE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW THE SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES ON PREMISES, ACCESSORY TO RETAIL CIGAR SALES ON A TWO ACRE DEVELOPED PROPERTY, ZONED C3 PROPERTIES, LOCATED ON THE SOUTH SIDE OF WEST EAU GALLIE BOULEVARD, EAST OF GUAVA AVENUE AND WEST OF HIGHLAND AVENUE. THE PROPERTY IS LOCATED IN COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO AND IS LOCATED IN OLD EAU GALLIE CRA DISTRICT. THE REQUEST IS LOCATED IN 670 SQUARE FOOT UNIT OF A MULTI-TENANT BUILDING. THE APPLICANT IS PROPOSING TO SELL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, ACCESSORY TO THE CIGAR SALES. THE ON PREMISES CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL, WHEN NOT IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RESTAURANT, DOES REQUIRE CONDITIONAL USE. AS WE JUST TALKED ABOUT, THE APPLICANT IS PLANNING TO BE OPEN FROM 12 P.M. TO 11 P.M. SUNDAY THROUGH THURSDAY AND 12 P.M. TO 1 A.M. ON FRIDAYS AND SATURDAYS. THE BUSINESS PLAN THAT THE APPLICANT HAS STATED IS THAT THEY'RE CATERING TO CIGAR AFICIONADO'S, LOCAL PROFESSIONALS AND TOURISTS LOOKING FOR A PREMIUM SMOKING EXPERIENCE. THE ESTABLISHMENT WILL SELL SELECTION OF CIGARS FROM AROUND THE WORLD, ACCESSORIES AND WE'LL HAVE CIGAR LOCKERS. THEY WILL ALSO BE SERVING A SELECTION OF WHISKEYS. THE FLOOR PLAN INCLUDES A BAR, MULTIPLE SEATING AREAS WITH 13 SEATS AND A HUMIDOR TO STORE CIGARS IN. THERE'S ONE BATHROOM IN THE FACILITY. THE OCCUPANCY FOR THIS WILL BE LIMITED TO 48 PERSONS. THIS IS THE SEATING LAYOUT. THE SITE IS LOCATED IN THE DOWNTOWN EAU GALLIE AREA. THERE'S A MIX OF USES WITHIN THE 500 FOOT RADIUS, CONTAINING RETAIL, OFFICE AND RESTAURANT AND RESIDENTIAL USES. STAFF ALSO HAS ADDED CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL TO THIS ORDINANCE TO ENSURE THE ON PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES WILL NOT AFFECT THE SURROUNDING AREA. THESE CONDITIONS THAT ARE INCLUDED INCLUDE CONDITIONS SUCH AS THE MAXIMUM SEATING ALLOWANCE OF EIGHT OF 13 SEATS, WITH A MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY OF 48 PERSONS, AGAIN CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL TO BE OCCURRING ENTIRELY WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, AND TWO OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF THE CITY'S NOISE OR OCCUPANCY WOULD BE A BREACH OF THE CONDITIONAL USE. THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD DID VOTE UNANIMOUSLY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THIS REQUEST, AND STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL.
ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2556 BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE PLANNING AND
[02:50:03]
ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS DITTMER, MAYOR? GO AHEAD SIR.NO QUESTION, JUST A STATEMENT. THIS IS A NATURAL PROGRESSION FOR DOWNTOWN EAU GALLIE. IT'S IT'S IT'S PURE I MEAN, IF YOU'VE EVER BEEN DOWN THERE THURSDAY AND FRIDAY AND SATURDAY NIGHTS, WHICH I THINK WE'VE ALL HAVE BEEN WALKING THE STREET, YOU CAN'T PARK DOWN THERE. WELL, WE'RE FIGHTING FOR THAT PARKING GARAGE, OF COURSE, BUT YOU KNOW, IT IS. IT'S A IT HAS BECOME A WALKING AREA. AND SO THIS AS I SAID, IS A NATURAL PROGRESSION TO THAT GROWTH. SO THANKS FOR YOUR HARD WORK ON THIS CINDY I APPRECIATE IT. I GOTTA GO AHEAD. MA'AM, I HAVE A QUESTION. WE'RE WE'RE LOOKING HERE AT THE LAYOUT. HOW ARE THEY? THERE'S A DOOR IF YOU'RE ON PAGE 369 AND 368 369, IS THE DOOR GOING IN STRAIGHT IN WHERE THE THERE'S LIKE A. IT SHOULD BE RIGHT. I THINK THEY FORGOT TO PUT THE DOOR. YEAH. WHERE DID THE DOOR. WHERE DO THEY COME IN THE DOOR. BECAUSE WE'RE LOOKING AT TWO DIFFERENT TWO DIFFERENT PICTURES HERE. IF YOU LOOK ON 368, 369 GOING IN, I DON'T HAVE THE PAGE NUMBER. SO I DON'T KNOW THAT ONE. OKAY. ON IT. THAT'S WHAT SHE'S SAYING. YEAH. AND IF YOU LOOK AT 369 IT HAS A DOOR COMING IN ON THE SIDE A GLASS DOOR. YES. THAT THAT ONE. SEE THE 359 DOESN'T SAY THAT. YEAH. IT'S GOT THE DOOR INSIDE. SO, SO IF YOU LOOK AT THE STREET VIEW GOING THE WRONG WAY, I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT WHERE THEY'RE COMING IN. SEE, THERE'S A LITTLE. I CAN'T THINK OF A LITTLE CUBBY AREA BETWEEN THE TWO UNITS WHERE THAT STAR IS. THERE'S AN OPENING, AND I BELIEVE YOU WALK INTO THAT OPENING AREA, AND THAT'S HOW YOU GET INTO THAT SIDE DOOR THAT YOU SEE. I SEE WHAT YOU'RE SAYING THERE. YEAH, YEAH. OKAY. THERE'S A LITTLE I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT COVERAGE AREA. I BELIEVE THAT'S HOW YOU, HOW YOU ACCESS IT SHOWED THAT THE FIRST PICTURE, THE PICTURE OF THE BUILDING, YOU CAN SEE THE DIFFERENCE OKAY. AND IT'S RIGHT NEXT DOOR TO WHERE THE OLD OFFICE WAS. YES, EXACTLY. ALL RIGHT. NICE. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS FOR MISS DITTMER? ALL RIGHT. THIS IS A QUASI ITEM. DISCLOSURES. NO, NO DISCLOSURES IN PUBLIC HEARING, NO SIGN UP SHEETS. CLOSE PUBLIC HEARING. BRING BACK TO COUNCIL. MAYOR. GO AHEAD. I RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2025, DASH 56, BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION. A SECOND, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? I VOTE AYE. AYE. MOTION PASSES. MOVE ON TO ITEM
[C.16. Ordinance No. 2025-57, The Collection: (First Reading/Public Hearing) An ordinance granting a conditional use (CU2025-0009) to allow the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages (beer and wine) on-premises, accessory to a retail food and wine market, in a multi-tenant building zoned C-3 (Central Business District), located on the east side of Cypress Avenue, west of North Harbor City Boulevard and north of West Eau Gallie Boulevard (1385 Cypress Ave, units 101 and 103). (Owner - Michael Spetko) (Applicant/Representative - Michael Hernandez) (P&Z Board - 11/6/2025)]
NUMBER 16. REPORT ON THIS IS MR. DITTMER. ACTUALLY IT'S GOING TO BE ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2557, MR. CONNELLY. THANK YOU. MAYOR. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, AMENDING THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP AS IT RELATES TO GENERAL ZONING ORDINANCE NUMBER 2005. DASH 120, BY GRANTING A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW FOR THE SALE AND SERVICE OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, BEER AND WINE FOR CONSUMPTION ON PREMISES IN CONJUNCTION WITH A RETAIL, FOOD AND WINE MARKET IN A 1500 PLUS OR MINUS SQUARE FOOT AREA. UNITS 101 AND 103 LOCATED ON A 0.18 PLUS OR MINUS ACRE PROPERTY ZONED C THREE CENTRAL BUSINESS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CYPRESS AVENUE, NORTH OF EAU GALLIE BOULEVARD AND SOUTH OF SAINT CLAIR STREET.1385 CYPRESS AVENUE, PROVIDING FOR CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL, PROVIDING THAT THE CONDITIONAL USE GRANTED HEREIN MAY BE REVOKED BY CITY COUNCIL IF THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL ARE NOT MET, PROVIDING THAT THE PROPERTY SHALL BE DESIGNATED ON THE OFFICIAL ZONING MAP BY THE SYMBOL CC3, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING AN ADOPTION SCHEDULE. THANK YOU.
PORTLAND, THIS IS MISS DITTMER. YES. THIS IS A FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE GRANTED A CONDITIONAL USE TO ALLOW THE SALE AND CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES, SPECIFICALLY JUST BEER AND WINE, ON PREMISES. AND THIS WILL BE ACCESSORY TO A RETAIL, FOOD AND WINE MARKET ON A 0.18 ACRE PARCEL ZONED C3. THE PARCEL IS LOCATED ON THE EAST SIDE OF CYPRESS AVENUE, NORTH OF EAU GALLIE BOULEVARD, AND SOUTH OF SAINT CLAIR STREET. THE PROPERTY IS IN COUNCIL DISTRICT TWO AND IN THE EAU GALLIE CRA AREA. THE REQUEST IS LOCATED IN A 1500 SQUARE FOOT UNIT THAT'S LOCATED IN A MULTI-TENANT BUILDING ON CYPRESS. THE APPLICANT PROPOSES TO SERVE BEER AND WINE ACCESSORY TO THE RETAIL, FOOD AND WINE MARKET.
AS I SAID BEFORE, THE ON PREMISE CONSUMPTION OF ALCOHOL WOULD NOT, IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE RESTAURANT, DOES REQUIRE THE CONDITIONAL USE APPROVAL. THE APPLICANT SPECIALIZES IN SELLING FOOD AND WINE PRODUCTS FROM A PRODUCT LOUNGE, WHICH WILL CONTAIN ITEMS FOR RETAIL SALES SUCH AS OILS, PASTA, SPICES AND HOT SAUCES THAT ARE AVAILABLE BOTH TO THE PUBLIC AND TO THE AREA. RESTAURANTS. THE ESTABLISHMENT WILL ALSO HAVE A WINE ROOM WITH DIFFERENT
[02:55:01]
WINE WINES FROM VARIOUS COUNTRIES. THE APPLICANT'S BUSINESS PLAN INDICATES THAT THIS WILL OPERATE THURSDAY, FRIDAY AND SATURDAY FROM 5 P.M. TO 10 P.M. AND THEN ON SUNDAYS FROM 12 TO 4 P.M. THE FLOOR PLAN IDENTIFIES THAT THEY CAN ACCOMMODATE APPROXIMATELY 15 PERSONS IN THE IN THE LOCATION. THEY HAVE AN OFFICE, A BATHROOM, AND A DRY STORAGE AREA. THE SEATING THAT'S INCLUDED ARE THREE TWO SEAT TABLES AND A SOFA. THEY WILL HAVE A LIMITATION CURRENTLY FOR A MAXIMUM OCCUPANCY OF 19 PERSONS. THEY DO HAVE THE ABILITY POTENTIALLY TO EXPAND A BATHROOM AND ALLOW THAT OCCUPANCY TO COME UP TO 50 PERSONS. THIS SITE IS ALSO LOCATED IN THE DOWNTOWN EAU GALLIE AREA, SO LOCATED IN AN AREA WITH VARIOUS MIXED USES SURROUNDING IT. THERE IS ONE RESIDENTIAL SINGLE FAMILY HOME LOCATED APPROXIMATELY 450FT TO THE NORTHWEST OF THE PROPERTY. STAFF HAS ALSO ADDED THE SAME TYPES OF CONDITIONS TO THIS REQUEST REGARDING THE LOCATION OF ON PREMISES BEING WITHIN THE INTERIOR OF THE BUILDING, LIMITING THE SEATING ALLOWANCE TO 19 PERSONS WITH THE POTENTIAL TO GO UP TO 50 IF THE APPROPRIATE BUILDING CHANGES ARE MADE, AND AGAIN ALSO THE TWO OR MORE VIOLATIONS OF THE CITY'S NOISE OR OCCUPANCY WOULD BE A BREACH OF THE CONDITIONAL USE. THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD DID VOTE UNANIMOUSLY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF THE REQUEST, AND STAFF WOULD RECOMMEND APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2557 BASED ON THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS CONTAINED IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM. THANK YOU. ANY QUESTIONS FOR MISS DITTMER? GO AHEAD SIR, QUICKLY. JUST FOR VISUAL, IT'S RIGHT DOWN THE STREET FROM DIRECT SEAFOOD ITALIAN AMERICAN CLUB. RIGHT. SO RIGHT DOWN THERE, YOU FIT RIGHT IN THERE. I'VE KNOWN MR. HERNANDEZ FOR YEARS, AND I TRUST HIS BUSINESS MODEL. SO I'M GOING TO VOTE POSITIVELY ON THIS. AND I MAY JUST EVEN BE YOUR FIRST CUSTOMER. WHO KNOWS? THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? THANK YOU. GOOD. OKAY. I KNOW THIS SOUNDS REALLY STRANGE TO SAY THIS, BUT I'M LOOKING AT THE FLOOR PLAN. HOW DO YOU GET TO THE BATHROOM IF YOU'RE. I SEE THE WALLS ON PAGE 390. THERE IT IS. SO, SIR, CAN YOU. I'M SORRY. AND IF YOU DON'T. HOLD ON, HOLD ON. IF YOU DON'T MIND, HE IS A SPEAKER. SO I'M GOING TO CALL, OPEN UP PUBLIC HEARING AND COME ON UP AND STATE YOUR NAME, SIR. HI, I'M MIKE HERNANDEZ. HI. SO IF YOU WALK THROUGH THE MAIN DOOR, THAT SQUARE IS ACTUALLY A HALLWAY THAT GOES RIGHT INTO THE NEXT BUILDING. IT'S DO YOU MEAN BY THE MAIN BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT. OH, OKAY. YOU SEE THE MAIN ENTRANCE AND ON THE SIDE HERE. AND THEN THERE'S THE STANDING BAR. SO WHERE THE BAR IS THAT THAT SQUARE IS A HALLWAY THAT WAS THERE. IT'S IT USED TO BE A DENTIST OFFICE THAT HAS A DOOR THAT GOES RIGHT THROUGH. DO YOU UNDERSTAND? I THINK THE MAYOR PERMISSION.YEAH. GO AHEAD. MA'AM, I THINK IT'S JUST THAT THIS ONE RENDITION PICTURE DOESN'T QUITE DEPICT THE HALLWAY, BUT I CAN SEE WHERE, LIKE, RIGHT HERE WOULD BE. HERE'S THE BATHROOM DOOR TO COME IN AND OUT. SO I'M JUST KIND OF LOOKING. THIS IS A LEGITIMATE ARCHITECT. SO IF YOU CAME OUT OF THAT BATHROOM DOOR, YOU JUST MAKE A LEFT. IT'S JUST A HALLWAY. THIS IS A HALLWAY.
OKAY. OH, YOU PUT YOU PUT AN ENDING ON THE HALLWAY. OH, THERE IT IS. OKAY, OKAY. YOU PUT A CAP ON THE HALLWAY. OKAY. SO THAT'S WHY I WAS KIND OF LIKE, YOU COULD GET THROUGH.
THAT'S OKAY. I WAS LIKE, OKAY, IT SOUNDS VERY IMPORTANT. IT'S VERY IMPORTANT THING I GOT YOU, I GOT YOU, YOU KNOW, I JUST THAT'S WHAT I WAS LOOKING AT, THAT FLOOR PLAN. I WAS LIKE, HEY, OKAY, THAT'S ALL. I HAD A QUESTION ABOUT LOOKING AT YOUR FLOOR PLAN THERE. OKAY. ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? NO. AND YOU ARE? SPEAKER. DO YOU HAVE ANY ARE YOU GOOD OR. I'M GOOD. OKAY.
THANK YOU, THANK YOU. ARE YOU GOING TO BE. YOU'RE GOING TO BE. THANK YOU SIR. IS THAT WHAT IF I REMEMBER RIGHT. ITALIAN OR FRENCH. SO MY 9 TO 5 I OPEN UP RESTAURANTS AND BARS FOR THE LAST ALMOST 20 YEARS ACROSS THE STATES, I TRAVEL THE WORLD. AND ONE OF THE THINGS THAT WE'RE MISSING HERE IS THAT WE ALL USE THE SAME ITEMS FROM THE SAME VENDOR. SO I HAVE COLLECTED, I HAVE 473 DIFFERENT LABELS OF WINE FROM ITALY AND FRANCE. NONE OF THEM HAVE EVER BEEN IN FLORIDA. I HAVE 300 THAT ONLY GET ALLOCATION ABOUT 100 INTO THE UNITED STATES A YEAR, WHICH I HAVE 95% ALLOCATION. AND THEN I HAVE ALL KINDS OF ITALIAN TOMATOES AND OILS AND PASTAS DIRECTLY FROM EUROPE THAT ARE NOT IN FLORIDA. SO YOU DIDN'T BRING ANY SAMPLES, RIGHT? NO BRIBERY UP HERE. ALL RIGHT. GOOD. THANK YOU. CAN I SAY IT OUT LOUD? SAY IT. YOU KNOW WHO
[03:00:04]
HIS. WHO HE'S MARRIED TO? WHO'S THAT? HIS FATHER IN LAW IS FRANKIE PIZARRO. OH, SEE, I KNEW I'D GET THAT. LOOK, I LOVE IT. YOU GOT IT. YOU GOT A LITTLE EXPERIENCE A LITTLE BIT, RIGHT? A LITTLE BIT. JUST A LITTLE BIT ENOUGH. YES. OKAY. WELL THANK YOU SIR. THANK YOU SIR. THANKS FOR. ALL RIGHT. NOT SURE. YEAH. NEXT. YEAH. STARTED WITH ANY DISCLOSURES OKAY. NO DISCLOSURES. CLOSED PUBLIC. WELL, BRING IT BACK TO COUNCIL. MAYOR. GO AHEAD. APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 2025, DASH 57, BASED UPON THE FINDINGS AND CONDITIONS IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM. SECOND, HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY[C.17. Ordinance No. 2025-58, Affordable Housing Updates: (First Reading/Public Hearing) An ordinance amending City Code, Appendix B, Article 5, Section 4, Affordable Housing Development, for compliance with recent Florida Statute changes. (Applicant - City of Melbourne) (P&Z Board - 11/6/2025)]
OPPOSED? SAY I VOTE AYE, AND THAT MOTION PASSES. WELCOME TO MY DISTRICT. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 17, ORDINANCE 20 2558. THANK YOU. MAYOR. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, MAKING FINDINGS AMENDING APPENDIX B OF THE CITY CODE ENTITLED ZONING AMENDING ARTICLE FIVE DISTRICT REGULATIONS AMENDING SECTION FOUR AFFORDABLE HOUSING DEVELOPMENT, PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND INTERPRETATION, PROVIDING AN EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING ADOPTION SCHEDULE.OKAY, REPORT ON THIS AS MISS DITTMER. YES, THIS IS THE FIRST READING OF AN ORDINANCE AMENDING CITY CODE APPENDIX B, ZONING ARTICLE FIVE, SECTION FOUR AFFORDABLE HOUSING AS IT RELATES TO CHANGES THAT HAVE BEEN MADE TO THE FLORIDA STATUTES, CHAPTER 166 LIVE LOCAL ACT. AS WE'VE TALKED ABOUT THE LAST FEW YEARS, THERE'S BEEN ADDITIONAL CHANGES THAT HAPPENED. THE LAST TWO LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATIVE SEASONS BACK IN 2023. TO GIVE YOU A QUICK BACKGROUND, WE MADE A SUBSTANTIAL AMOUNT OF NEW AND EXISTING AFFORDABLE HOUSING STANDARDS. WE CENTRALIZED INTO THIS NEW SECTION FOUR WITHIN ARTICLE FIVE OF THE ZONING CODE INCENTIVE OPTIONS THAT COUNCIL PULLED INTO THE CODE AT THAT TIME WERE REDUCED ZONING AND LAND DEVELOPMENT REGULATIONS, DEFERRALS AND WAIVERS OF IMPACT FEES AND DENSITY BONUS, AND LITTLE LIVE LOCAL ACT BONUSES WERE PUT INTO THIS SECTION. SO AS WE'VE FOLLOWED THE CHANGES THAT THE STATE'S MADE, THEY'VE MADE ADDITIONAL CHANGES THE LAST TWO YEARS THAT WE'RE GOING TO INCORPORATE INTO CITY CODE. WE HAVE BEEN FOLLOWING THESE CHANGES BY STATUTE, BUT WE'D LIKE TO MAKE IT CLEANER AND HAVE THOSE ACTUALLY WITHIN CODE. SO I'M JUST GOING TO REAL QUICKLY GO THROUGH WITH YOU THE 5 OR 6 CHANGES THAT WE HAVE WITHIN THIS ORDINANCE. SEVERAL OF THEM, MOST OF THEM WERE MANDATORY. SEVERAL OF THEM WERE OPTIONAL. SO I WANT TO MAKE SURE COUNCIL UNDERSTANDS WHAT OPTION THAT WE'RE PROPOSING. THE FIRST ONE IS REGARDING THE ALLOWANCE FOR PROPERTIES THAT HAVE ACTIVE RELIGIOUS INSTITUTIONS THAT CONTAIN A HOUSE OF PUBLIC WORSHIP, A CHURCH ALLOWING THEM TO BE ABLE TO DEVELOP AFFORDABLE HOUSING ON THEIR PROPERTIES. THE LEGISLATIVE LEGISLATION SAID THAT WE MAY CHOOSE TO ALLOW THIS. STAFF TOOK A LOOK AT WHERE A LOT OF OUR CHURCHES ARE IN THE CITY, PREDOMINANTLY, YOU SEE THEM ZONED I-1, INSTITUTIONAL ZONING OR ZONED IN AN R1 SINGLE FAMILY DISTRICT WITH A CONDITIONAL USE. WHAT WE WERE CONCERNED ABOUT IS THIS WOULD BE AN AUTOMATIC. THERE WOULD BE NO CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OR APPROVAL. SO WHAT WE'VE PROPOSED IS THAT WE WOULD ALLOW THOSE IN THE I-1 ZONING DISTRICTS, THEY TEND TO BE LARGER PARCELS. THEY TEND TO NOT BE LOCATED, YOU KNOW, SOLELY WITHIN A SINGLE FAMILY NEIGHBORHOOD, LIKE WE DO HAVE SOME CHURCHES. SO WE FELT LIKE THE ABILITY TO ALLOW THOSE ABILITY TO DEVELOP AFFORDABLE HOUSING WOULD BE ALL RIGHT ON THE INSTITUTIONALLY ZONED PROPERTIES OR NOT. WE'RE NOT ALLOWING ALL CHURCHES AS WE COULD HAVE BY THE CHANGE IN THE STATUTES. NEXT THING THEY, THE LEGISLATURE DID IN 2024, THEY PUT SOME RESTRICTIONS ON AFFORDABLE HOUSING REGARDING THE PROXIMITY OF THEM TO AIRPORTS AND TO THE RUNWAYS. SO WE'VE ADDED THOSE DISTANCE REQUIREMENTS IN THERE THIS YEAR. THEY ALSO LOOKED AT THE PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS. WE ALREADY HAVE SOME REDUCTIONS IN PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS, BUT THIS ONE ACTUALLY WAS A LITTLE BIT DIFFERENT THAN THAN WHAT WE WERE ALLOWING. WE WERE ONLY ALLOWING REDUCTIONS IN TWO BEDROOMS FOR LOW AND VERY LOW INCOME. THE STATUTE NOW SAYS WE HAVE TO ALLOW UP TO A 15% REDUCTION FOR ALL OF OUR LEVELS OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING, SO WE'RE MAKING THAT CHANGE THAT WILL LOWER THAT ALLOWANCE ON THE PARKING. ADDITIONALLY, THERE WAS SOME CONFUSION IN THE 2023
[03:05:02]
VERSION ABOUT WHETHER A DENSITY BONUS THAT SOMEBODY COULD GAIN ANYWHERE IN THE CITY HAD TO BE ALLOWED THROUGHOUT THE WHOLE CITY. THEY CLARIFIED THAT LANGUAGE IN 2024. SO WE'RE CLEANING UP THAT LANGUAGE. ALSO IN 2024, THEY ADDED LANGUAGE REGARDING THE ABILITY TO RESTRICT A MAXIMUM HEIGHT ALLOWANCE. CURRENTLY, IF YOU'RE WITHIN A MILE OF ONE OF OUR C3 DISTRICTS, YOU COULD BUILD 96FT IN HEIGHT. THAT IS NOT GOING TO BE PERMITTED WHEN YOU'RE ADJACENT TO SINGLE FAMILY ON TWO SIDES, AND IT'S WITHIN A SINGLE FAMILY DEVELOPMENT, WITH AT LEAST 25 SINGLE FAMILY HOMES IN THAT AREA. SO ESSENTIALLY, IF YOU'RE ABUTTING A FAIRLY, YOU KNOW, LARGE SINGLE FAMILY ZONING AREA, YOU'LL BE LIMITED TO THE HEIGHT ALLOWANCE OF THAT ZONING DISTRICT, WHICH IS TYPICALLY GOING TO BE EITHER 36FT OR 48FT, DEPENDING ON RESIDENTIAL OR COMMERCIAL ZONING. THE NEXT 1 IN 2024, THEY DID MODIFY AND REQUIRE CITIES TO ALLOW UP TO 150% OF OUR FLOOR AREA RATIO TO BE UTILIZED. WE'VE ADDED THAT LANGUAGE IN, AND THEN THE ONE OTHER LAST CHANGE, CURRENTLY SINCE 2004, WE'VE HAD AN EXPEDITED PERMITTING POLICY, AN ADMINISTRATIVE POLICY THAT COUNCILS APPROVED AND REVIEWED OVER THE YEARS. WE'RE PROPOSING TO JUST PUT THAT LANGUAGE IN CITY CODE. SO IT'S ONE LESS POLICY THAT WE HAVE TO TRACK. AND IT'S VERY CLEAR TO THE PUBLIC, WHEN THEY'RE READING OUR AFFORDABLE HOUSING SECTION THAT WE DO ALLOW EXPEDITED PERMITTING FOR AFFORDABLE HOUSING PROJECTS. AND OTHER THAN THAT, WITH SOME VERY MINOR FORMATTING CLEANUP CHANGES AS WE WENT ALONG, THAT COVERS WHAT'S PROPOSED. THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD DID REVIEW ALL OF THESE REQUIREMENTS AND VOTED UNANIMOUSLY TO RECOMMEND APPROVAL. ADDITIONALLY, WE DO HAVE THE AFFORDABLE HOUSING ADVISORY COMMITTEE THAT WILL MEET DECEMBER 2ND THAT WILL REVIEW THE PROPOSED CHANGES IN REGARDS TO THE IMPACT ON THESE CHANGES FOR THE CONSTRUCTION OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING, WHICH WILL ALL BE POSITIVE BECAUSE THESE ARE INCENTIVES TO TO HELP ALLOW THAT DEVELOPMENT. SO WITH THAT, STAFF RECOMMENDS APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2558 BASED UPON THE FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS? I DO HAVE A QUESTION. IT'S NOT QUITE IN HERE. HOW DID WEST MELBOURNE GET OUT OF. THEY HAVE THEY'RE THEY'RE NOT ALLOWING ANY LIVE LOCAL ACT HOUSING. HOW ARE THEY DOING. HOW ARE THEY ABLE TO DO THAT. I WOULDN'T WANT TO SAY THAT I UNDERSTAND HOW THEY'RE DOING THAT. I MEAN, BECAUSE AND THEY'RE PROUD OF IT. SO I WANTED TO KNOW THERE WAS SOME LANGUAGE IN THE ORIGINAL 2023 VERSION THAT BASICALLY IF YOU WERE A PREDOMINANTLY RESIDENTIAL COMMUNITY AND I FORGET THE PERCENTAGES, THAT YOU DID HAVE SOME ABILITY TO DO THAT. BUT I THINK IT WAS LIKE IF YOU HAD LESS THAN 20% COMMERCIAL, SOMETHING LIKE THAT. BUT I DON'T KNOW IF. I CAN'T IMAGINE THAT WEST MELBOURNE FIT UNDER THAT THRESHOLD, BUT I DON'T I DON'T KNOW HOW THEY'RE DOING THAT. I MEAN, BECAUSE THAT'S ALWAYS BEEN A QUESTION OF MINE, HOW THEY'VE GOTTEN OUT OF IT BECAUSE THEY HAVE IT RIGHT ON 192. YOU KNOW, THAT'S THAT'S PRETTY MUCH A 100% COMMERCIAL PROPERTY OPERATION. AND THEN YOU HAVE WHAT DO THEY CALL MINTON ROAD DOWN THAT WAY.THAT'S ALMOST ALL COMMERCIAL DOWN THAT WAY. SO I DON'T KNOW. I MEAN, IF THEY'RE NOT THAT BIG OF A CITY, I JUST DIDN'T KNOW HOW THEY GOT AWAY WITH. AND THERE'S OTHER BUSINESSES, LITTLE BUSINESS PARKS INSIDE THERE. SO I WAS WONDERING HOW THEY WERE ABLE TO DO THAT. YEAH, I'M NOT AWARE. I'M GOING TO THE LEAGUE OF CITIES. I'VE SEEN SMALLER CITIES THAT HAD A THEY WERE A LOT SMALLER THAN WEST MELBOURNE, BUT YET THEY FIT INTO THE SIGN UP SHEET. YOU KNOW, THEY HAD TO THEY HAD TO FOLLOW THE LIVE LOCAL ACT. SO I WAS WONDERING HOW THAT LITTLE TOWN GOT IT. AND THEY WERE WORRIED ABOUT IT BECAUSE THEY'RE THAT WAS THEIR. SOURCE OF INCOME WAS THAT COMMERCIAL PROPERTIES. SO THAT'S WHY I WAS WONDERING HOW THAT HOW THAT HAPPENED. I AND I MAY BE INCORRECT, BUT I THINK WHAT THEY HAD DONE IS RIGHT. WHEN THE LAWS WERE COME INTO EFFECT, THEY PASSED AN ORDINANCE OR SOMETHING AND THEY GOT GRANDFATHERED. I THINK I REMEMBER IT'S JUST VERY VAGUE. I KNOW I HAVE A I HAVE A CLIENT THAT HAS A PIECE OF PROPERTY IN WEST MELBOURNE, AND THEY ARE NOT ABLE TO DO THE IT'S A COMMERCIAL PIECE OF PROPERTY AND THEY SHOULD BE ABLE TO DO THE LIVE LOCAL ACT AND PEOPLE WANT IT. BUT THEY SAID, OH NO, YOU CAN'T DO IT. SO I WAS JUST WONDERING HOW THAT HOW THAT HAPPENED. RIGHT. YOU DON'T KNOW. YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND IT EITHER. YOU'VE GOTTEN THAT ONE. MR.
[03:10:01]
LARUSSO'S GOING. YEAH. I DON'T UNDERSTAND HOW THEY'VE GOTTEN AWAY WITH IT. SO THAT'S ALL RIGHT. BUT WE'RE NOT DEBATING WEST MELBOURNE. BUT I JUST DON'T KNOW HOW IT HAPPENS SO THAT WHEN WE HAVE A KNOWLEDGE WHY WE'RE FOLLOWING THE RULES AND DOING THE LIVE LOCAL ACT AND THE NEXT TOWN OVER ISN'T DOING WELL, THAT'S A GOOD POINT. GOOD POINT? I'LL ASK THE MAYOR.SO ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? ALL RIGHT. THIS IS A PUBLIC HEARING. NO SIGN UP SHEETS. CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AND BRING IT BACK TO COUNCIL FOR APPROVAL.
ORDINANCE 20 2558. BASED UPON THE FINDINGS CONTAINED IN THE PLANNING AND ZONING BOARD MEMORANDUM. SECOND, I HAVE A MOTION AND A SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED?
[C.18. Ordinance No. 2025-59, Water and Sewer Impact Fees: (First Reading/Public Hearing) An ordinance amending water and sewer impact fees; amending City Code, Chapter 58, Utilities; amending Section 58-131, Water Impact Fees; and amending Section 58-242, Sewer Impact Fees; Cost of Extension.]
THAT MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON TO ITEM NUMBER 18, AN ORDINANCE AMENDING WATER AND SEWER IMPACT ORDINANCE NUMBER 20 2559. MR. CONLEY, THANK YOU, MAYOR. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF MELBOURNE, BREVARD COUNTY, FLORIDA, RELATING TO WATER AND SEWER IMPACT FEES, MAKING FINDINGS AMENDING CHAPTER 58 OF THE CITY CODE ENTITLED UTILITIES AMENDING SECTION 58 131 ENTITLED WATER IMPACT FEES AND AMENDING SECTION 58 242 ENTITLED SEWER IMPACT FEES PROVIDING FOR SEVERABILITY AND INTERPRETATION, PROVIDING EFFECTIVE DATE AND PROVIDING ADOPTION SCHEDULE. OKAY. THANK YOU. REPORT ON THIS IS ROSS MCGINN. GOOD EVENING AGAIN.MAYOR AND COUNCIL, THIS IS THE ITEM WHERE I GET TO QUIZ YOU ON HOW WELL YOU PAID ATTENTION AT BOTH WORKSHOPS. HERE WE GO. OH, I KNOW YOUR TYPE, BUT BUT YES, HERE I AM YET AGAIN, HAT IN HAND. I THINK WHAT WHAT MY MESSAGE HAS BEEN AND HAS BEEN REPEATEDLY OVER THE PAST UMPTEEN ITEMS HAS BEEN WE HAVE NOT DONE RATE STUDIES AT A RESPONSIBLE RATE OF TIME. WE'VE BEEN LONG OVERDUE FOR A VARIETY OF THESE. WE SAW THAT WITH THE WATER AND RATE STUDY BACK TWO YEARS AGO, PRIOR TO THE MOST RECENT ONE THAT WE DID, AND THIS WAS ALWAYS GOING TO BE A COMPONENT PIECE OF THIS ONE. SO THE ORDINANCE BEFORE YOU TONIGHT, 20, 25, 59, IS BASICALLY GOING TO PUT INTO EFFECT WHAT HAS BEEN DISCUSSED, WHICH IS TO USE THE EXTRAORDINARY CIRCUMSTANCES PROVISION OF THE EXISTING FLORIDA STATE STATUTE TO ALLOW US TO BEGIN CHARGING A RESPONSIBLE AMOUNT OF NEW DEVELOPMENT, TO HAVE THEM APPROPRIATELY PAY THEIR SHARE OF THE EXPANSION OF THE SYSTEM, AS WE HAVE BEEN DOING SINCE 2012, WE'VE ESSENTIALLY ALLOWED FOR MORE AND MORE OF THE SYSTEM EXISTING RATEPAYERS TO EFFECTIVELY PAY FOR. WHAT ARE SOME OF THE EXPANSION RELATED PROJECTS THAT HAVE ALLOWED NEW DEVELOPMENT TO COME ONLINE? I CAN PROBABLY WAX POETIC ABOUT THIS FOR THE NEXT HOUR. YOU'VE HEARD A LOT ABOUT WHAT WE'VE ALREADY TALKED ABOUT AT THE WORKSHOPS, BUT I WOULD LOVE TO GET COUNCIL'S OPINION AND DISCUSSION ON WHAT WE'VE DISCUSSED SO FAR AND WHETHER OR NOT I CAN HELP CLARIFY ANY OF THE ITEMS BEFORE YOU. OKAY. ANY QUESTIONS? TWO WORKSHOPS. YOU REALLY NAILED US, MAN. YEAH, MAN, I JUST WANTED TO GO OUT OF TOWN ON TUESDAY, BUT NOW DID THE PUBLIC HEARING NO SIGN UP SHEET FOR THE PUBLIC HEARING BRING BACK COUNCIL? GO AHEAD.
MA'AM, APPROVAL OF ORDINANCE 2025 DASH 59. AND I'LL SECOND THAT. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? I VOTE AYE, AND THAT MOTION PASSES. THANK YOU. MOVED
[C.19. Discussion of continued negotiations of an Amendment to the Interlocal Agreement between the City of Melbourne, Olde Eau Gallie Riverfront Community Redevelopment Agency, and Brevard County as it relates to the Eau Gallie Parking Garage Project.]
ON TO ITEM NUMBER 19. IT'S GOING TO BE DISCUSSION OF INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. I'M GOING TO TAKE THIS ONE. AND ACTUALLY YES I WAS GOING TO SAY MISS LAMB YOU MIGHT WANT TO TAKE THIS ONE OKAY. IF THAT'S ALL RIGHT. SO NO PLEASE. OKAY. SO THE CITY ATTORNEY AND I WENT TO THE COMMISSION MEETING LAST WEEK, ALONG WITH THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL MEMBER. SMITH WAS THERE, TOO, AND THE DEVELOPER WAS ALSO IN ATTENDANCE. BUT THREE THREE OF US SPOKE THE CITY ATTORNEY, THE MAYOR AND I SPOKE. SO, YOU KNOW, RATHER THAN READ THROUGH THE EXACT ITEM REPORT HERE, THERE REALLY WERE SEVERAL TOPICS THAT WERE KEY POINTS IN THIS INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT. AND SO I'M JUST GOING TO GO THROUGH SOME OF THEM. ONE WAS THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES. AND SO THE WAY THAT IT HAD BEEN WORDED BEFORE, WE HAD TALKED ABOUT A 300 SPACE PARKING GARAGE OR THEREABOUTS, AND 90% OF THE SPACES WERE SUPPOSED TO BE FOR PUBLIC PARKING. WE THEN WENT IN WHEN WE DID THIS LAST DRAFT, BECAUSE WITH THE PUBLIC, WITH WITH DOING THE PUBLIC PRIVATE COMPONENT OF IT AND THE HOTEL PARKING BEING, BEING BEING ADDED TO THE TOTAL NUMBER OF PARKING SPOTS, WE COULD NOT GET THE 90% THERE, YOU KNOW, THAT JUST WASN'T CONTEMPLATED BEFORE. SO IN YOUR AGENDA PACKET, WE SAID THAT WE HAD ALREADY PROPOSED 250 DEDICATED PARKING SPOTS, AND THAT WAS WHAT WAS ALREADY IN THE DRAFT AGREEMENT SINCE THAT TIME. IN LOOKING AT IT, I THINK THAT IT WOULD BE BETTER IF IT WAS 300 BEFORE AND WE SAID 90%. SO THAT[03:15:03]
10% IS 30. SUBTRACT THE 30 OFF THE 300. THAT'S 270. SO WE WOULD WE WERE AS FAR AS STAFF PERSPECTIVE, COMFORTABLE TO CHANGING THAT TO THE 270. AND THEN COMMISSION COMMISSIONERS HOPEFULLY WON'T FEEL LIKE THEY LOST OUT ON ANYTHING BECAUSE THAT'S THE EXACT SAME AMOUNT.THEY ALSO TALKED ABOUT. WELL, I BROUGHT UP THAT WE PROBABLY WOULD BE ABLE TO PAY OFF THE DEBT EARLY AND THAT WE COULD AGREE TO REDUCING THE DECREASING THE DATE OF WHEN WE SUNSET. IT WAS SUPPOSED TO BE 2038. I THINK WE FEEL COMFORTABLE WITH SUNSETTING AT 2033. WE CAN PAY OFF PAY OFF THE DEBT BY THEN. AND I HAVE DISCUSSED THAT WITH WITH ROSS AND HIS FINANCIAL KNOWLEDGE THERE, AND HE IS THE ONE THAT SAID THAT, THAT WE CAN DO THAT.
SO I DID MENTION THAT IN FRONT OF THE COMMISSION, THEY DID BITE AT IT. THE REASON WHY IT IS SHOULD BE ATTRACTIVE TO THEM. AND I THOUGHT IT WOULD BE A GOOD NEGOTIATING POINT OR MAYBE, YOU KNOW, SWEETEN THE POT A LITTLE. THERE IS IF WE SUNSET FIVE YEARS EARLY, THAT IS THAT THEN MEANS THE MONEY IS NOT DEDICATED TO THAT CRA DISTRICT. AND SO THEN IT BECOMES CITY OF MELBOURNE GENERAL FUND, BREVARD COUNTY GENERAL FUND. SO IN THAT FIVE YEAR TIME FRAME, THEY THE COUNTY SERVES TO TO GAIN ABOUT $2 MILLION OF TAXES TAX REVENUE. SO IT'S IT'S A IT'S A WIN FOR THEM. THEN WE GET INTO AND BEFORE PROBABLY THE BIGGER CONVERSATION COMMISSIONER DELANEY BROUGHT UP I THINK IT WAS HER BROUGHT UP THE LID LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT. AND SO STAFF HAS INVESTIGATED THAT. AND SO IF YOU KNOW AT FIRST WE'RE LIKE WELL WE CAN PROBABLY INCORPORATE THAT IN. BUT WHEN YOU THINK ABOUT THE SITE WITH THE PARKING GARAGE AND WHAT IS A PARKING GARAGE MADE OF MOSTLY CONCRETE, THAT COULD BE DIFFICULT. SO STAFF REACHED OUT TO COUNTY STAFF TODAY, THE NATURAL RESOURCES DEPARTMENT AND SAID, OKAY, YOU KNOW, WE LOOKED UP WHAT YOUR LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT RULES ARE. HOW DO YOU SEE THAT HAPPENING? AND BASICALLY LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT IS MORE FOR LIKE A PROPERTY THAT'S VIRGIN LAND. OR IF YOU'RE DOING LIKE A COMPLETE REDEVELOPMENT OF A AT LEAST A BLOCK OR SO, A MUCH BIGGER AREA.
SO WE THINK WHAT MAYBE WAS INTENDED WAS GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE INSTEAD OF LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT, BECAUSE THAT'S MORE APPROPRIATE FOR A REDEVELOPMENT SITE. BUT THAT'S REALLY THE ONLY OPTION HERE. AND REALLY WHAT THEY'RE LOOKING FOR IS ADDITIONAL NUTRIENT REMOVAL. AND SO THAT'S SOMETHING WE STILL DON'T HAVE ENOUGH OF THE DETAILS IRONED OUT FOR THE CONSTRUCTION YET, BUT IT COULD BE SOMETHING THAT WE COULD CONSIDER. BUT I'M A LITTLE CONCERNED ABOUT TOTALLY LOCKING US INTO LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT, BECAUSE I'M NOT SURE THAT IT IS SOMETHING WE'D HAVE TO WORD IT SUCH THAT, IF APPLICABLE, OR IF ELIGIBLE, SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES. AND WHEN STAFF SPOKE TO THE COUNTY STAFF, THEY THEY AGREED WHEN THEY HEARD WHAT WAS GOING TO GO ON THE SITE. SO THEN THE MAIN TOPIC SEEMED TO BE ABOUT PARKING, FREE PARKING. AND THERE'S SEVERAL COMPONENTS TO IT. BUT I THINK IF WE TALK ABOUT THE BIGGEST ONE FIRST, THE THE BIGGEST ONE IS THE ORIGINAL AGREEMENT OR I SHOULD SAY THE MOST RECENT AGREEMENT. WELL, THE THE EXISTING AGREEMENT, THE EXISTING AGREEMENT SAYS FREE PARKING FOR A PERIOD OF 50 YEARS. SO IN THE THE REVISED AND RESTATED AGREEMENT, THE DRAFT WE HAD PROPOSED FOR A PERIOD OF FIVE YEARS UNTIL AND UNTIL A PARKING MANAGEMENT STUDY HAD BEEN DONE. YOU KNOW, WE WERE THINKING ABOUT LIKE WHAT WE WERE WHAT WE WERE DOING IN DOWNTOWN MELBOURNE AT THE TIME, AND WE WERE MOVING ALONG. AND JUST SO THERE'S NO NO ONE MISTAKING THIS, THE, THE WE WEREN'T CHARGING PARKING TO CREATE SOME HUGE AMOUNT OF REVENUE. WE WERE WE WOULD BE CHARGING PARKING TO MAINTAIN THE BUILDING. WE'D SET THE RATES SO THAT WE HAD MAINTENANCE. SO THE DRAFT AGREEMENT THAT WE HAD PROPOSED HAD A TIME FRAME OF FIVE YEARS. I THINK THAT DIFFERENTIAL BETWEEN FIVE YEARS AND 50 YEARS SEEMED. AND I'M, YOU KNOW, I CAN'T SPEAK FOR THE COMMISSIONERS, BUT WHAT I HEARD THAT SEEMED LIKE IT WAS A LITTLE TOO TOO MUCH OF A DIFFERENCE. I DON'T KNOW IF WE TRY MORE TO MEET HALFWAY IN THE MIDDLE. IF WE SAY THAT WE'RE GOING TO COMPLETELY, YOU KNOW, WE'LL GO BACK TO THE 50 YEARS JUST AS COUNCIL. WE NEED TO YOU NEED TO REALLY THINK ABOUT WHAT THAT MEANS TO THE BUDGET AND, AND HOW THAT SETS US UP FOR THE FUTURE. YOU KNOW, I'M LOOKING AT OUR OUR PARKING GARAGE. WE HAVE JUST RIGHT HERE IN THE PARKING LOT. AND THAT PARKING GARAGE, YOU KNOW, THE FIRST FIVE, TEN YEARS, IT'S JUST ROUTINE MAINTENANCE. YOU START GETTING TO ABOUT THE 15 YEAR MARK. YOU KNOW, WE'RE LOOKING AT SOME OF THE METAL PLATES, SOME OF THE JOINTS, AND YOU START DOING REPAIRS LIKE THAT. SO IF WE WERE TO GO TO COMPLETELY FREE PARKING IN THE GARAGE FOR THE 50 YEARS, I DO HAVE TO WARN YOU THAT WHEN WE
[03:20:05]
DO SUNSET, THE, THE, THE CRA THAT WHEN THAT FUND, WHEN WE LOOK AT WHAT THE FUNDING THAT'S GOING BACK INTO THE GENERAL FUND, I STRONGLY ENCOURAGE THAT WE ALLOCATE SOME OF THAT MONEY DIRECTLY TO MAINTENANCE FOR THAT GARAGE. WE SET UP A FUND FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE GARAGE THAT WE WE PUT MONEY IN ANNUALLY. AND AND BY THAT POINT OF THAT SUNSET, WE CAN FIGURE OUT WHAT THOSE ANNUAL COSTS ARE AND HAVE A LITTLE BETTER IDEA OF WHAT WE SHOULD BE PLUGGING INTO EACH MONTH OR EACH YEAR. EXCUSE ME, THAT REALLY IS A TOPIC FOR COUNCIL TO DISCUSS WHERE THEY THINK WE THAT STAFF SHOULD BE GOING WITH THIS NEXT NEGOTIATION. THERE WERE SOME OTHER ITEMS, BUT IF THE PARKING ITEM GETS RESOLVED, THEN WE DON'T NEED TO NECESSARILY TALK ABOUT THE THE THE PAID PARKING GOING DIRECTLY FOR MAINTENANCE. AND THEN ALSO THEY HAD THE CITY RESIDENTS PAY THE SAME AS COUNTY RESIDENTS. NOW, MIND YOU, THAT WAS ALREADY IN THE DRAFT AGREEMENT THAT THEY HAD IN THEIR HANDS. THAT'S THAT WAS ALREADY WRITTEN INTO THE AGREEMENT. SO TO ME THAT THOSE AREN'T REAL IMPORTANT POINTS TO TO DISCUSS BECAUSE WE'D ALREADY AGREED TO THEM. SO THE MAIN THING IS, TO ME, THE FREE PARKING, MAKING SURE YOU'RE OKAY WITH THE NUMBER OF SPACES, OUTLINING THEM AT THE 270, AND THEN IF IF COUNCIL IS OKAY WITH THE SUNSET OF FIVE YEARS EARLY. AND WHEN WE LOOK AT WHAT'S NEXT AFTER THIS DISCUSSION ITEM AND THAT WILL HOPEFULLY BE DIRECTION FOR STAFF ON ON HOW TO PROCEED. THE COUNTY COMMISSION IS HEARING THEY TABLED IT UNTIL DECEMBER 2ND, WHICH IS NEXT TUESDAY, AND IT'S AN EVENING MEETING. AND SO BUT SO THEIR AGENDA ALREADY WENT OUT. I BELIEVE THE AGENDA WENT OUT YESTERDAY. BUT I DID SPEAK TO THE COUNTY MANAGER LAST FRIDAY. HE HAS LET THE COMMISSIONERS KNOW, AND HE HAS ALSO LET HIS STAFF KNOW THAT WE ARE PREPARED, DEPENDING ON WHAT HAPPENS IN OUR CONVERSATION TONIGHT, THAT WE CAN DRAFT A LETTER TO THEM, EXPLAIN WHAT WE'VE TALKED, YOU KNOW, WHAT COUNCIL'S AGREED TO TONIGHT AND POSSIBLY EVEN INCLUDE A A RED LINE OF THE DRAFT. AND ADAM'S ALREADY PREPARED, YOU KNOW, AT LEAST SOME OF THE TALKING POINTS THAT WE HAD IN IN THE MEMO AND WHAT I'VE BROUGHT UP TONIGHT. SO I DON'T KNOW IF ADAM, YOU WANT TO ADD ANYTHING TO THAT OR, YOU KNOW, AS FAR AS THE DISCUSSION GOES, WE'RE REALLY JUST LOOKING FOR DIRECTION. AND LIKE I SAID, MAINLY IT'S THE NUMBER OF SPACES, THE SUNSET AND THE FREE PARKING. AGAIN, RIGHT FROM FROM COUNCIL'S DIRECTION BACK IN EARLY JULY, WE HAD WE HAD DRAFTED A PROPOSED, REVISED AND RESTATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT TO REPLACE THE EXISTING 2021 AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY TO ADDRESS TO ADDRESS THESE ISSUES, RIGHT, TO ADDRESS THE ABILITY TO DEVELOP THE GARAGE THROUGH PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP, TO ADDRESS, YOU KNOW, SOME OF THE LANGUAGE IN THE EXISTING INTERLOCAL THAT, YOU KNOW, MADE THAT MADE THAT DIFFICULT. THE 90% REQUIREMENT, AGAIN, TO AND ALSO TO ADDRESS ISSUES OF, OF MAINTENANCE COSTS AS WE WENT AND PITCHED THAT TO TO THE COUNTY, WE HEARD WE HEARD THEIR FEEDBACK AND THEIR AND THEIR CONCERNS. AND SO TONIGHT IS AGAIN FOR YOU TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THOSE CONCERNS WERE AND WHAT JENNY AND MY THOUGHTS ARE ON, ON HOW TO ADDRESS THAT. AND SO IF THERE'S DIRECTION AND A COMFORT LEVEL FROM, FROM YOU ALL TO FOR US TO, YOU KNOW, MAKE FURTHER REVISIONS TO THAT PROPOSED, REVISED AND RESTATED INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WILL BE ABLE TO GO BACK TO THE COUNTY AND SAY, YES, CITY COUNCIL'S OKAY WITH CHANGING THE SUNSET TO 2033. WE'RE OKAY WITH A PERIOD OF TIME FOR FREE PARKING, WHATEVER THAT MAY BE. RIGHT? I THINK THAT'S VERY MUCH WORTHY OF A OF A CONVERSATION. AND AND SO AGAIN, RIGHT. THE, THE YOUR DIRECTION TONIGHT ON ON ON HOW TO HOW TO MOVE FORWARD WILL GIVE JENNY AND I DIRECTION ON HOW TO REPRESENT TO THE COUNTY ON ON DECEMBER 2ND. I HAVE ONE QUESTION. I'M GLAD IF SOMETHING WERE TO HAPPEN TO THE HOTEL, WHAT HAPPENS TO US WITH THE GARAGE? IF IN THE IN THE UN CAME TO ME LIKE THAT, IT JUST KIND OF ONE OF ONE OF THOSE THINGS. NO, NO. YEAH. YOU KNOW, IF SOMETHING WERE TO HAPPEN TO THE HOTEL, IT CEASED OPERATION FOR WHATEVER REASONS. WHAT WOULD US, AS THE CITY HAVE, HOW WOULD WE MANAGE THE GARAGE? SO THE THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY VERY MUCH REQUIRES THE CITY TO OWN THE PARKING GARAGE. WHAT WE'VE CONTEMPLATED THROUGH THE PUBLIC HEARINGS, IN THE INITIAL NEGOTIATIONS WE'VE HAD WITH THE HOTEL DEVELOPER, IS SOME FORM OF LEASE OR LICENSE AGREEMENT FOR THOSE THOSE PARKING SPACES[03:25:06]
THAT THEY NEED TO MEET THEIR CODE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE HOTEL PROJECT. THAT AGREEMENT HASN'T BEEN OBVIOUSLY HASN'T BEEN FINALIZED YET, AND WE'LL HAVE TO ADDRESS THOSE SCENARIOS WHERE, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE THEY'RE NOT IN OPERATION. RIGHT. BUT THE GENERAL CONCEPT IS THAT WE ARE PROPORTIONATELY SHARING CERTAIN MAINTENANCE, YOU KNOW, CAPITAL MAINTENANCE COSTS, YOU KNOW, FOR FOR THE UNDERLYING GARAGE. MY INITIAL THOUGHT WOULD BE IS THAT THAT OBLIGATION DOESN'T END JUST BECAUSE THEY'RE, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE NOT IN OPERATION. BUT AGAIN, RIGHT. THOSE ARE NEGOTIATING POINTS THAT WE HAVEN'T FINALIZED YET. AND IF YOU DON'T MIND, AND I'M NOT SURE WHAT COUNCIL MEMBER HANLEY WAS ASKING LIKE, YOU MEAN IF THE IF THE HOTEL GOES AWAY TOMORROW, DO YOU MEAN CAN WE BUILD THAT GARAGE OURSELVES? I MEAN, OKAY, WE'RE WE'RE IN THE. EVERYTHING IS GOING WELL. WE HAVE THE INTERLOCAL AGREEMENT.I MEAN, NOT THE BUT THE AGREEMENT WITH THE HOTEL. SOMETHING HAPPENS TO THE CEASES OPERATIONS, PERIOD. OKAY. CAN'T CAN'T AFFORD, YOU KNOW, JUST CEASES OPERATION. WHAT DO WE YOU KNOW, YOU'RE SAYING THAT THEY STILL HAVE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF THE MAINTENANCE OF THE GARAGE. AT THAT POINT IN TIME, WE HAVE NOT FINALIZED THOSE TERMS. IT JUST KIND OF CAME TO ME LIKE, WHERE DO WE STAND WITH IT? AND YOU KNOW WHAT? HOW DO WE GO? WHERE DO WE STAND WITH SOMETHING LIKE THAT? RIGHT. AND I'LL KIND OF ANSWER THAT QUESTION. I KNOW THEY THEY'VE DONE THEIR ANALYSIS. AND ALL THAT. IF SOMETHING HAPPENED, THEY GOD FORBID. NO, NO, OF COURSE, COVID, COVID 2.0 LET'S SAY, OR WHATEVER. NO, LIKE CAUGHT ON FIRE, YOU KNOW, SOMETHING LIKE THAT. THE BUILDING SHOULD BE INSURED AND IT WOULD BE. BUT YOU SEE OR GO BACK THEY THEY SOLD IT. THE NEXT COMPANY GOES BANKRUPT. WHAT YOU KNOW, LIKE THERE'S A BANKRUPTCY. WHAT DO WE WHAT EXPOSURE DOES THE CITY HAVE WITH THAT SITUATION? YEAH.
THERE ARE THERE ARE A NUMBER OF VERY BAD CASE SCENARIOS WHERE THE CITY ENDS UP BEING RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CAPITAL AND ANNUAL MAINTENANCE OF A 540 PLUS OR MINUS, YOU KNOW, SPACE PARKING GARAGE, BECAUSE WE WILL OWN IT. OKAY. YEAH, BUT BUT IT WILL BE THE THE OTHER PORTION WILL BE BUILT BY THEM. SO A COUPLE THINGS BACK IN 2021 WORKING WITH THEN COMMISSIONER TOBIAS AND COMMISSIONER ZONKA, THE AGREEMENT FOR COUNCIL WAS THAT ALL CRA MONEY AT THAT POINT FROM THE STREETSCAPE AND ALL GO INTO FUND THIS PROJECT. SO THE CITY TOOK OUT ANYTHING EXCEPT THE GARAGE, WHICH AT THIS POINT WE'RE AT ABOUT $6.8 MILLION IN THE FUND FOR THIS GARAGE. SO THAT'S WHAT WE HAVE CURRENTLY ABOUT 6.8. THIS MIGHT BE A LITTLE IT'S BETWEEN LIKE 5.6 AND SIX. I THINK IT WAS 6.8 TO THE COUNTY. OKAY. 6.86. 8TH MAY REFER TO THE AMOUNT THAT WE WERE ORIGINALLY ALLOWED TO FINANCE. OKAY. FROM THE FROM THEN YOU SAY WOULD SAY 6 MILLION THEN. YEAH IT'S IN IT'S IN THE, IT'S IN THE 5.6 TO 6 MILLION AT THIS POINT. SO THE 90% INITIALLY SPEAKING TO THEM WAS WHEN THE COMMISSIONER SAID, WELL, WHEN YOU BUILD THE 300 PARK, 300 PARKING GARAGE SPACE, PARKING GARAGE, WE WANT 90% OF THAT TO BE PUBLIC PARKING. WELL, NOW THAT IT'S AN ADD ON WITH THE HOTEL, THAT IN MY OPINION, 90% DOESN'T APPLY, OUR 390% WOULD BE 270. THAT'S WHY WE'D SAY WE'RE YOU'RE STILL GOING TO GET THAT SAME AMOUNT. BUT IN OUR MIND WAS THE 500 AND SOMETHING WE 90% SHOULD BE PUBLIC PARKING. WELL, THE HOTEL IS PAYING FOR THE TWO SOMETHING 200 AND SOMETHING TO BILL 250 OR SOMETHING TO BUILD. SO THAT THAT KIND TO ME A MOOT POINT. SO I THINK THE THE BIG STICKLER SPEAKING TO THE COUNTY IS, IS THE THEY, THEY WANT THE FREE PARKING. AND I KIND OF AGREED WITH THE CITY ATTORNEY AT THAT POINT WHERE DOWN THE ROAD FOR MAINTENANCE, YOU KNOW, YOU HAVE TWO WAYS TO FUND THIS, EITHER USER FEE OR THROUGH TAXES. AND IT WAS KIND OF HAVING THE USERS PAY FOR SOMETHING AS OPPOSED TO JUST THE TAXES. BUT THEY THEY KIND OF STRESSED THAT THEY WANTED THEY WANTED THE, THE FREE PARKING FOR 50 YEARS. BECAUSE I'M LOOKING AT, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU'RE SAYING ABOUT THAT IS I'M JUST USING SOME OF THE BEACHFRONT, THE BEACH ACCESS IS NOW A LOT OF THEM HAVE IT THAT YOU HAVE TO PAY. YOU PAY A PARKING FEE. I'M JUST THINKING CERTAIN SPOTS AND SATELLITE BEACH, MELBOURNE BEACH NOWADAYS THEY REQUIRE THEM TO DO. BECAUSE THEY HAD
[03:30:02]
BAD NEGOTIATORS. DO WE PAY A PARADISE BEACH? NO. WE HAD GOOD NEGOTIATORS WITH THE COUNTY.BUT YOU KNOW THERE'S GOOD AND BAD IN THAT. THERE'S GOOD AND BAD BECAUSE THE, THE, YOU KNOW, THE MAINTENANCE AND ALL THAT. AND WE CAN SAY 50 YEARS, YOU KNOW, WHAT'S IT GOING TO BE LIKE, YOU KNOW, COULD, CAN WHAT'S, WHAT'S 50 YEARS GOING TO BE LIKE FROM HERE. SO OF COURSE THAT CAN CHANGE. THEY CAN CHANGE THEIR MIND TOO. AND IN MY OPINION THIS IS A WIN FOR THE COUNTY BECAUSE THEY GET FIVE YEARS OF THE CRA SUNSET, OR ABOUT $1.8 MILLION. WE TOLD THEM BACK TOWARD THEIR FUNDING. THEY'RE GOING TO GET HOTEL TAX, NOT TO MENTION THE BREVARD COUNTY AND MELBOURNE RESIDENTS USE THAT. SO IT'S KIND OF A WIN SITUATION. WE JUST HAVE TO GO BACK AT THEM AND SAY, LISTEN, WE UNDERSTAND THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU YOU WANT THE FREE PARKING.
SO THAT'S SOMETHING THE COUNCIL NEEDS TO KIND OF UNDERSTAND. I THINK OUR STAFF ALSO MENTIONED ONE OF THE OPTIONS TOO IS TO HAVE ON STREET PARKING PREMIUM PAID DOWN THE ROAD AFTER THE SUNSET, IF THAT HAS TO BE DONE, AND MAYBE THAT MONEY GOING IN TOWARD FUNDING ANY KIND OF MAINTENANCE COSTS. SO THERE'S SOME OPTIONS, THERE'S GOING TO BE MAINTENANCE AND IT'S GOING TO BE BIG MAINTENANCE. YOU KNOW, IT'S JUST LIKE ANY OTHER HOME OFFICE BUILDING OR ANY ANY TYPE OF STRUCTURE. AFTER A CERTAIN POINT IN TIME, THERE'S MAINTENANCE NO MATTER WHAT. SO HOW, YOU KNOW, HOW ARE WE GOING TO ABSORB THOSE, YOU KNOW, THOSE THOSE COSTS? I AND I AGREE WITH YOU. THE BIGGER QUESTION IS HOW'S IT GOING TO BE FUNDED, I THINK, AND YOU KNOW, O'GALLEY O'GALLEY NEEDS PARKING BADLY. OH, YEAH. BUT EVEN IT DOES NEED IT. BUT MY THING IS THAT WE'RE A LOT OF THE IT DOES NEED THE PARKING, THERE'S NO DOUBT ABOUT IT. BUT WHERE WE HAVE THE CIVIC CENTER NOW, A LOT OF PEOPLE WON'T PARK THERE TO WALK UP TO INTERCOASTAL NOMADS AND ALL THAT. THEY DON'T WANT TO DO THAT WALK. I MEAN, THEY DON'T WANT TO WALK ONLY BUT THEY DON'T WANT TO WALK. I MEAN, LET'S FACE IT, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE WALKING NOW BECAUSE THEY THEY'RE PARKING WAY DOWN, DOWN THE ROAD. SO UNFORTUNATELY PARKING NOW. BUT WHAT'S WHAT'S THE COUNCIL'S THOUGHT ON GOING BACK TO THE COUNTY. ARE YOU GUYS OKAY WITH THE STAFF WRAPPING UP THE NEGOTIATIONS? I MEAN, WE HAVE NO CHOICE IN IT.
I AM ABSOLUTELY. AND I THINK WE GOT NAILED BECAUSE THEY NEVER COCOA BEACH AND THE COUNTY NEVER NEGOTIATED THE NO, NO, NO CHARGE OR, OR LESS CHARGE. AND SO THEY CHARGE FULL TIME WHEN YOU GO TO COCOA BEACH PARKING GARAGE. AND THAT'S WHAT TICKED OFF TOBIAH TO NO END. YEAH. AND THAT'S WHY WE'RE THAT'S WHY WE'RE IN THE POSITION WE ARE RIGHT NOW. BECAUSE FROM WHAT I BEING GOING TO ONE OF THE LEAGUE OF CITIES AND ONE OF THE COUNCIL MEMBERS GOING, THAT'S ALMOST ONE OF THEIR THEIR BIGGEST MONEY MAKERS IN THE CITY OF COCOA BEACH IS THEIR PARKING GARAGE. YES. YOU KNOW, AND COUNTY DOESN'T GET A DIME. SO AND I THINK THEY WANT TO PUT A SECOND ONE THERE. THEY MADE A COMMENT. YOU KNOW, YOU KNOW HOW SOMEBODY MAKES A COMMENT SAYING, YOU KNOW, HOW THEY WANT TO PUT THEY WANT TO PUT ANOTHER ONE. AND THEY'RE SAYING THEY THEY WOULD HAVE THE. THE PEOPLE WOULD USE IT. THAT'S THE RIGHT WAY. I SAY THAT WE GO BACK TO THE COUNTY. WE DO. WE FOLLOW STAFF'S RECOMMENDATION. IF THERE'S NEGOTIATING TO BE DONE AT THE TABLE, THEN WE'LL DO IT AT THE TABLE AND TRY TO GET A FEEL FOR EXACTLY WHAT THEY WANT AND WHAT THEY DON'T WANT, AND ASK THEM IF YOU'RE READY TO MAKE A DEAL TONIGHT. WE'LL SIGN THE PAPERS AND THAT'LL BE ON DECEMBER 2ND. YEAH, AT LEAST WE'LL GET A CONSENSUS, YOU KNOW.
YEAH. SO GO AHEAD, MISS LIAM. OR GOOD MISTER SMITH, YOU KNOW. SO, MAYOR. YEAH, I WAS AT THE MEETING AND I THINK THERE WAS SOME, SOME OF THE POINTS THAT CITY MANAGER MADE, I THINK CLARIFICATION OF THE NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES, YOU KNOW, JUST KIND OF NEGOTIATING THAT THEY REALLY LIKE THE SUNSET OF 2033 VERSUS THE 38. AND JUST BEING ABLE TO EXPLAIN TO THEM THAT, YOU KNOW, YOU'RE GETTING A LARGER TAX BASE, RIGHT. IT'S JUST REALLY JUST REALLY STRESSING BECAUSE I THINK SOME OF IT GOT LOST IN SORT OF THE TECHNICALITY OF STUFF, AND IT REALLY WASN'T THINKING ABOUT THE BIGGER PICTURE, YOU KNOW, THAT COMMISSIONER FELTNER WAS REALLY TRYING TO GET THEM TO SEE THE BIGGER PICTURE, BUT THEY THEY JUST SORT OF BEARING DOWN ON SOME OF THE OTHER POINTS. AND THEN I DID KIND OF I DID GO TO THE LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE. SO MAYBE JUST THROWING OUT A LITTLE, LITTLE THOUGHTS OF LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT THINGS, NOTHING BIG. BUT, YOU KNOW, YOU CAN MENTION BIO TENSION AREAS AND, YOU KNOW, THE THE PAVEMENTS, JUST THROWING OUT SOME OF THOSE LITTLE THINGS THAT ARE POSSIBLE JUST TO SORT OF THAT COULD BE INCORPORATED. THE ONLY THING IS LIKE THERE'S THE I CALL IT THE, THE, THE PARKING PAVEMENT THAT CAN BE VACUUMED AND ALL THAT WE WOULD
[03:35:02]
END UP HAVING. I DON'T THINK WE HAVE ONE IN THE CITY NOW, DO WE? ANY ONE OF THOSE MACHINES THAT IF IT'S PERMANENT BACKDROP LIKE A BACKDROP, WELL, WE HAVE A VAC TRUCK, BUT WE DON'T HAVE THE VACUUM OF THAT, THAT PERVIOUS CONCRETE. WE DON'T HAVE A VAC TRUCK SPECIFICALLY, I DON'T KNOW. IT'S BEEN 2 OR 3 YEARS AGO WHEN WE'RE GOING TO THE MRC AND THEY SAID THAT WASN'T IT'S A GREAT IDEA, BUT IT'S NOT HAVING IT'S NOT READY FOR PRIME TIME. I'M NOT SAYING THAT ONE IN PARTICULAR, BUT IT'S A GREAT IDEA. DON'T GET ME WRONG WITH THAT. IT WOULD BE IN A LOT OF THE SPOTS. THERE COULD BE A GREAT IDEA, AND THE LOWER AND THE LOWER LEVEL, IF IT COULD HOLD THE HIGHER LEVEL CONCRETE. BUT I'M JUST I'M JUST GOING BACK TO SOME OF THE THINGS THAT HAPPENED, LIKE WHEN THE ELEMENT CAME ON AND THEY JUST MENTIONED LITTLE THINGS ABOUT WHAT THEY WERE DOING AT THE ELEMENT DEVELOPMENT. WE'VE HEARD LITTLE THINGS THAT THE MARGARITAVILLE, I MEAN, SO THOSE LITTLE, LITTLE MENTIONS OF WHAT WE'RE ATTEMPTING TO DO IN OUR LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT, JUST THOSE ARE VERY SELLABLE POINTS THAT SAY, OH, OKAY, THAT'S GOOD.ALSO, DIDN'T HAVEN'T YOU REACHED OUT? YOU SAID YOU REACHED OUT TO COUNTY STAFF AND FIND OUT WHAT THEY MEANT. YOU TRY TO DEFINE LID, RIGHT? RIGHT. SO RATHER THAN TO REINVENT THE WHEEL BACK HERE, LET'S LISTEN TO WHAT THEY HAVE TO SAY COMING BACK TO US. AND THEN INCORPORATE THAT INTO THE INTO THE. WE HAD THAT CONVERSATION TODAY AND THEY'RE, THEY'RE NOT LIKE STEERING US IN A CERTAIN DIRECTION. BUT THE LOW IMPACT DEVELOPMENT FREQUENTLY GETS INTERCHANGED WITH GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE. AND I THINK IF WE SAY ANYTHING, I THINK WE NEED TO CALL IT GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE IN WHATEVER WE DO, BECAUSE THERE IS THERE'S NOT HUGE QUANTITIES AND IT SORT OF COVERS, BUT THE GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, I DON'T KNOW, CAN WE PUT GOLD AND GOLD IN THE VAULTS? CAN WE DO SOMETHING LIKE THAT? NOW, MIND YOU, ALL OF THAT HAS COSTS. AND SO WHO'S GOING TO BEAR THAT COST. SO WHEN WHEN THIS CITY HALL WAS BEING BUILT, 2009, I GUESS IT WAS RIGHT. YOU WERE YOU WERE THE DIRECTOR OF ENGINEERING, RIGHT. OKAY. SO THERE WAS A LOT OF CONVERSATION ABOUT THIS BEING A GREEN BUILDING. CORRECT.
WHAT WHAT CAN WE TAKE AWAY FROM THAT? WE DIDN'T FOLLOW THAT BECAUSE IT WAS GOING TO BE TOO COSTLY. I MEAN, WE FOLLOW SOME OF IT, BUT NOT ALL OF IT, OF COURSE. UNFORTUNATELY THE WORD GREEN GETS USED QUITE A BIT. AND LIKE THE GREEN BUILDING STANDARDS, VERY DIFFERENT THAN YES. BUT WHAT YOU'RE TALKING ABOUT AND WE INCORPORATED QUITE A BIT, WE DID NOT GET CERTIFIED AS SUCH BECAUSE THAT JUST THE COST OF DOING THAT AND COMMISSIONING IT AS THAT WAS, WAS TOO COSTLY. AND BUT WE DID INCORPORATE ELEMENTS. RIGHT. AND SO WE CAN, WE COULD MAYBE ADD SOME LANGUAGE THAT WE WILL INCORPORATE ELEMENTS OF GREEN INFRASTRUCTURE, SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES. WE CAN LOOK OVER OUR SHOULDER AND SEE WHAT WE'VE DONE AND SEE WHAT WE'VE DONE THAT HAS BEEN SUCCESSFUL, VERSUS TRYING TO GUESS WHAT WILL BE SUCCESSFUL AT I THINK, YEAH, WELL, JUST HEARING IT, HEARING THE WAY THAT IT CAME UP FROM THAT PARTICULAR COUNTY COMMISSIONER. YOU KNOW, I JUST THINKING TO YOUR POINT, THE MENTION OF SOME OF THOSE THINGS.
WHAT. OH, OKAY. AND IT'S NOT THAT WE'LL JUST MENTION IT. I MEAN, WE WILL TRY OUR HARDEST TO INCORPORATE THAT. YEAH. YEAH. AND I MEAN, I STILL I THINK THE FREE PARKING, HOW LONG FOR THE FREE PARKING STILL IS REALLY THE, YOU KNOW, IT'S NOT SO MUCH A STANDING UP THERE IN FRONT OF THE COMMISSION NEGOTIATING IT TO THEM AT THAT POINT. LIKE, WE SORT OF NEED TO HAVE A CONSENSUS OF WHAT OUR RANGE IS LIKE. DO WE SAY TEN YEARS? DO WE SAY 20 YEARS? DO WE JUST GO THE WHOLE 50? RIGHT. AND MY THING IS, I DON'T WANT TO STRAP THE NEXT THE COUNCIL, LET'S SAY IN 20 YEARS TO STRAP THEM SO THAT THEY'RE STUCK. THEY CAN'T DO ANY, YOU KNOW, THEY HAVE TO BE FREE PARKING BECAUSE THINGS CAN CHANGE IN THE 20 AND 20 YEARS THAT THEY NEED TO, YOU KNOW, LAWS CHANGE, THINGS CHANGE. SO LET'S NOT HOLD, YOU KNOW, PUT THEM IN HANDCUFFS SO THEY CAN'T CAN'T CHARGE AT THAT POINT IN TIME. THAT'S MY ONLY THING. GO BACK AND RENEGOTIATE.
YEAH. I MEAN AND YEAH, THAT'S A GOOD POINT, MR. RUSSO. THE FACT IS, WHEN THERE'S A NEW COMMISSION, NEW COUNCIL CAN GO BACK AND SAY, LISTEN, IT'S JUST FOR MAINTENANCE. AND I KNOW, BUT BUT YOU KNOW, WHAT I'M SAYING IS I JUST WANT TO MAKE SURE THAT WE'RE NOT PUTTING STRAPPING THE NEXT COUNCIL IN THERE THAT THEY CAN'T MISS. BETH. ARE YOU FINISHED? YEAH.
OKAY. SORRY. I JUST WAS WONDERING, ARE WE PUTTING IN NEGOTIATIONS AT THE HOTEL? IS GOING TO HELP MAINTAIN THE GARAGE AT ALL. WELL, THAT WAS THE ORIGINAL. THEY WERE GOING TO PICK UP THE MAINTENANCE OF THE GARAGE. THEY WERE. I MEAN, THAT'S WHAT I SO, SO DIFFERENT.
I'M TRYING TO BE CLEAR ON DIFFERENT DIFFERENT DIFFERENT AGREEMENT. RIGHT. THIS IS THIS IS THE CITY AND THE CRAS AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY ON WHAT THE CRA CAN USE ITS FUNDS FOR, WHAT PROJECT IT CAN DO, AND WHAT REQUIREMENTS OF THAT PROJECT EXIST THAT THE THAT THE COUNTY IS IMPOSING UPON US, AND THAT THE CITY AND THE CRA ARE AGREEING TO. SO WE'RE GOING TO HAVE A VERY LARGE IF IT GETS APPROVED, WE WILL HAVE A VERY LARGE. YES, YES, INDEED. BUT THAT WAS ONE OF THE BULLET POINTS IN THE P3 WHEN WE HAD THAT FIRST PUBLIC HEARING OR
[03:40:03]
THE ADVERTISED PUBLIC HEARING JUST A COUPLE WEEKS AGO. IT SEEMS LIKE IT MIGHT HAVE BEEN LONGER AGO NOW. THAT WAS ONE OF THE ITEMS THAT WE HAD IN THERE, WAS THAT THAT WE NEEDED TO FINALIZE NEGOTIATIONS ON WHO'S DOING WHAT. BUT THE ONE THING WAS THE MAINTENANCE, LIKE THE CLEANING, THE PRESSURE WASHING, THAT TYPE THING. I THINK WE IN OUR PRELIMINARY NEGOTIATIONS WITH THE HOTEL WOULD BE THEY WOULD HANDLE THOSE ITEMS, BUT ONCE YOU GOT OVER A CERTAIN DOLLAR VALUE, THEN IT WOULD BE A SHARED A SHARED MAINTENANCE COST. SO LIKE IF THE ELEVATOR DOORS ARE BROKEN, LIKE WE WOULD HAVE TO LIKE JOINTLY PAY TO FIX THE ELEVATOR DOORS OR SOMETHING ALONG THOSE LINES. YOU DID A GOOD JOB AT THE COUNTY MEETING BECAUSE I DON'T THINK SOMETIMES WE DON'T THINK ABOUT MAINTENANCE OF A PARKING GARAGE. YOU JUST THINK THAT YOU BUILD IT AND IT JUST STAYS. BUT BUT I THINK THAT THERE'S SO MANY LESSONS LEARNED FROM. SO I THINK THAT IF WE HAVE TO SET A TIME FRAME, MAYBE NO MORE THAN TEN YEARS. BUT THEN. BUT ROSS ALSO POINTED OUT TO US EARLIER TONIGHT THAT IF WE DON'T DO THESE STUDIES, I THINK THAT HAS TO BE AT THE BEHEST OF DOING A SOME KIND OF STUDY TO SEE WHAT IS THE MAINTENANCE COST, WHAT IS PROJECTED. BECAUSE IF WE LOCK OURSELVES IN AND WE SAY THAT PARKING HAS TO BE FREE FOR A CERTAIN TOO LONG OF A TIME, AND THEN THEY WILL LOOK BACK AT THE MINUTES, YOU KNOW, I THINK THAT WE AGREED TO MAYBE FIVE YEARS, NO MORE THAN TEN YEARS AND THEN SAY, BUT WE HAVE TO HAVE A WAY OF ADJUSTING THE COST AND HAVING SOME TYPE, I MEAN, DON'T HAVE TO CHARGE A LOT. I MEAN, A DOLLAR OR $2 PER PERSON GO A LONG WAY TOWARDS MAINTENANCE IN THE FUTURE. AND I AND I UNDERSTAND, I, I DEFINITELY AGREE WITH YOU 100%. BUT YOU WERE AT THAT MEETING AND YOU WE WE ALL WALKED OUT WONDERING THAT, YOU KNOW, HEY, LET'S LET'S GET THIS DONE. AND I THINK YOU WERE KIND OF SURPRISED, LIKE I WAS LIKE OUR STAFF. SO THE WHOLE IDEA IS THINKING OF ALTERNATE WAYS BECAUSE EITHER IT DOESN'T HAPPEN OR, YOU KNOW, YOU WERE THERE. AND SO OFFERING OFFERING A A SET TIME AND THEN SAY, BUT WE STILL HAVE TO HAVE THE IT MAY STAY, IT MAY STAY FREE, BUT WE HAVE TO HAVE A WAY OF ADDRESSING IT JUST IN CASE.RIGHT. AND TO THAT POINT, AND FOR THE OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO WEREN'T PRESENT EFFECTIVELY, THE COUNTY COMMISSION REJECTED OUR INITIAL OFFER OF A FIVE YEAR FREE, FREE TIME FRAME AT LEAST FIVE YEARS. WE SAID FOR AT LEAST FIVE YEARS WE WILL NOT WE WILL NOT CHARGE FOR PARKING.
AND THEN AFTER THAT FIVE YEAR PERIOD, WE WON'T IMPLEMENT PARKING CHARGES UNTIL CITY COUNCIL ADOPTS A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN FOR THE GARAGE. AND IN DOWNTOWN EAU GALLIE AREA.
THAT WAS THAT WAS THAT WAS WHAT THE AUGUST 14TH VERSION OF THE RESTATED AND REVISED INTERLOCAL THAT THAT WAS PRESENTED TO COUNTY STAFF AND WAS CONSIDERED BY COUNTY COMMISSION AT RIGHT.
SO, SO AND AGAIN, RIGHT. THE THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS WHO WERE PRESENT AND SPOKE WERE REFERENCING BACK TO THE EXISTING LANGUAGE IN OUR IN OUR CURRENT IS 50 IS A 50 YEAR TIME FRAME. AND SO I THINK JENNY AND I ARE STILL LOOKING FOR AN UNDERSTANDING OF DIRECTION OR CONSENSUS ON ARE WE ARE WE GOING ALL THE WAY TO 50 YEARS? ARE WE TRYING TO SPLIT THE DIFFERENCE? I WILL TELL YOU GENERALLY, AND I THINK BOTH MISS BASSETT AND MISS HALEY BROUGHT IT UP. OF THE LONGER TIME FRAME WE GET INTO WHERE WE'RE GUARANTEEING FREE PARKING.
THERE WERE OTHER THINGS THAT WE THAT WE HAD TRIED TO NEGOTIATE AND TRIED TO TELL BOTH COUNTY STAFF AND THE COUNTY COMMISSIONERS. WE'RE TRYING TO UNDERSTAND WHAT THAT PARKING FEE REVENUE WAS GOING TO BE USED FOR. AND SO WE HAD SAID, WE'RE GOING TO LIMIT THE USE OF THAT REVENUE SPECIFICALLY TO MAINTENANCE ON THE GARAGE. BUT IF YOU GET INTO A TIME FRAME WHERE IT'S LIKE 50 YEARS FREE AND THEN YOU'RE LIMITING WHAT THAT REVENUE LOOKS LIKE, THAT'S AN AWFUL BIG GIVE, RIGHT? AND SO MY RECOMMENDATION WOULD BE THE LONGER THE LONGER YOU OFFER FOR FREE PARKING, THEN THOSE OTHER RESTRICTIONS I THINK GO AWAY. RIGHT. IF IF YOU'RE OFFERING 2530 YEARS OF FREE PARKING, I DON'T THINK THE COUNTY HAS A REASONABLE STATEMENT TO TO BE TELLING YOU HOW HOW TO BE TELLING FUTURE CITY COUNCILS HOW TO USE THE PARKING REVENUE AFTER THAT STAGE. SO THAT'S MY, MY, MY OPINION. SO THAT WAS YOUR OPINION, YOUR TAKEAWAY FROM THAT MEETING THAT TUESDAY, THAT IF WE PROVIDED IF WE SAID 50 YEAR PARKING, THAT EVERYTHING ELSE WOULD BE JUST EVERYTHING WOULD BE FINE. NO, NO, THAT'S MY RECOMMENDATION TO YOU. AND AS A NEGOTIATING POINT, RIGHT. AS I'M NOT SAYING THAT THE THAT THE COUNTY WOULD NECESSARILY AGREE TO THAT, I'M SAYING IN THE BEST INTEREST OF THE CITY, NOT NOT TO GIVE AWAY BOTH AN EXTENDED PERIOD OF TIME OF FREE PARKING AND THEN ALSO AGREE TO TO LIMIT HOW ANY PARKING REVENUES IN THE FUTURE, AFTER THAT TIME FRAME, GET USED ONLY FOR ONLY FOR A LIMITED PURPOSE. WELL, THAT ALTMAN IS THE IS THE COMMISSIONER FROM MY DISTRICT, WHICH IS THAT RIGHT THERE. YOU'VE WORKED WITH FELTNER IN THE PAST. THEY BOTH SUPPORT IT, BUT THEY BOTH SUPPORTED THAT. YEAH. SO SO HOW DO WE REACH OUT TO THE OTHER ONES AND KNOCK ON
[03:45:04]
THEIR DOOR AND SAY, LOOK, I THINK, I THINK, I THINK THAT OUR STAFF GOES BACK AND SAYS, YOU KNOW, WE UNDERSTAND AND AND WHAT, YOU KNOW, WHAT ABOUT 25 YEARS IF WE CAN'T COME TO AN AGREEMENT AND, YOU KNOW, AND BUT AGAIN, IT'S, IT'S A 15. I MEAN, LET'S, LET'S BE REAL 15 YEARS BECAUSE THAT'S WHEN YOU'RE STARTING, I WOULD ALMOST SAY, AND I AGREE WITH YOU, I AGREE, I AGREE, I ALMOST WANT TO SAY WHAT IS WHAT'S YOUR BENDING POINT TO THE COUNTY? I MEAN, WOULD YOU DO 20, WOULD YOU DO 15? I THINK 15 IS MORE THAN NOT THAT WE WILL. WE WOULD SAY AT 15, NEGOTIATE 15 YEARS FREE PARKING AND THEN LOOK AT IT AGAIN AT THAT TIME PERIOD BECAUSE THINGS CAN BE DIFFERENT. CAN WE GIVE THEM A TIERED GROWTH? I MEAN A TIERED OPPORTUNITY? 1520, 25 AND THIS IS WHAT IT WILL LOOK LIKE OVER THOSE THREE YEARS. YOU DON'T HAVE ONE CHOICE. YOU GOT THREE CHOICES. AND THEN YOU PICK BECAUSE WE'RE OKAY WITH EITHER THE THREE TRYING TO PICK THE LONGEST AND HOW MANY? WELL OF COURSE HOW MANY MORE DO WE NEED? HOWEVER, YOU KNOW, WE'RE WE'RE LEANING INTO THAT NEGOTIATION. I THINK WITH THE TIMING, I THINK OUR STAFF NEEDS TO GO BACK AND AND IT'S MY, YOU KNOW, MY OPINION THAT DO THE BEST NEGOTIATION. BUT UNDERSTAND, JENNY, WHAT DO YOU THINK? WELL, WHILE WHILE THERE WAS SOME STATEMENTS HERE ABOUT WHO WAS SUPPORTING THE PROJECT OR NOT OR SUPPORTING THE AGREEMENT OR NOT, THERE WAS ONLY ONE PERSON THAT MADE THE MOTION AND THERE WAS NOT A SECOND. AND SO ALMOST EVERY SINGLE ONE OF THEM TALKED ABOUT FREE PARKING, FREE PARKING, FREE PARKING, LIKE IN MOST OF THEM SAID, YOU KNOW, I, I COULDN'T TELL FROM THE CONVERSATION. SOME OF THEM WERE THE 50 YEARS IS WHAT YOU AGREED TO BEFORE. THAT'S WHAT YOU NEED TO. SOME OF THEM SEEM LIKE THEY WERE WILLING TO SPLIT THE DIFFERENCE THERE, BUT I THAT'S WHY LIKE I'M NOT SAYING THAT IT'S JUST TO ME IT'S IT'S UNREALISTIC 50 YEARS. IT'S ABSOLUTELY UNREALISTIC BECAUSE BY THE TIME 50 YEARS THAT COULD BE PROBABLY BE FOREVER. WELL, YEAH. I MEAN, HOW LONG DOES IT PARKING I DON'T KNOW HOW LONG PARKING GARAGE IS. IT WILL NEED MAJOR RENOVATIONS AFTER BEFORE THE 50 YEAR MARK. WHERE ARE WE GOING TO GET THE MONEY FOR THAT PARKING GARAGE FOR FOR THAT COUNCIL, FOR THOSE CITIZENS. I DON'T THINK I'LL BE HERE IN 50 YEARS, BUT. THE PARKING GARAGE, I WILL. IS IT TRUE? YOU TELL ME, ADAM, THAT THE CHAIRMAN CANNOT SECOND A MOTION? NO, WE GOT WE GOT CLARIFICATION FROM COUNTY STAFF ON THAT. WELL, I HEARD DIFFERENT. YEAH, IT WAS, IT WAS HOW I WAS INTERPRETING IT IN THE MOMENT OF OF NOT UNDERSTANDING WHY WHY THERE HADN'T BEEN. BUT THAT'S, THAT'S NOT MY UNDERSTANDING OF, OF WHAT THEIR PROCEDURES ARE. OKAY.THANK YOU. BECAUSE I JUST THINK IT'S SO UNREALISTIC 50 YEARS. I MEAN, WE DON'T WE DON'T EVEN YOU HAVE A REGULAR PARKING LOT AND THEY DON'T LAST 50 YEARS, SO. SO YOU'RE LOOKING FOR DIRECTION FROM US. AND ONE OTHER POINT I'LL MAKE. YEAH. AND I YOU KNOW, I HATE YOU KNOW, I DON'T LIKE I DON'T LIKE IT WHEN MY STAFF DELEGATES UP TO ME. AND SO I, I REMISS TO TO DELEGATE UP TO YOU. BUT THERE WAS A QUESTION ABOUT HOW DO WE REACH OUT, HOW DO WE HOW DO WE DO CERTAIN THINGS? I WOULD SAY GENERALLY, LOBBYING EFFORTS ARE BEST DONE BETWEEN ELECTED OFFICIALS, AND I AGREE. YEAH, THAT'S WHY I SAID LET'S ALL TOUCH EACH ONE OF OUR COMMISSIONERS. RIGHT. EVERYONE THAT REPRESENTS US. SO I'LL GO TO THAD. YOU GO TO ROB. YOU KNOW, I MEAN, I ALREADY HAVE YOU HAVE. SO GO AGAIN. I THINK IT COMES DOWN TO PARKING, BUT I JUST THINK THOUGH 50 YEARS. THAT'S OKAY. ALL RIGHT. SO SO LET'S LET'S GO OUT AND FIGURE IT OUT AND THEN COME BACK. LET'S GO. LET'S GO TALK OKAY I THINK WE NEED TO THEY NEED IT TONIGHT TO, TO BE TO BE ABLE TO TAKE SOMETHING TO THEM SUBSTANTIVELY ON THE ON THE SECOND. SO MAYOR WHAT'S OUR NEGOTIATING POINT. I WOULD START 15. NO. HELL NO NO NO THAT'S IT I'M 15. WHAT'S THE ALTERNATIVE IF THEY TURN US DOWN AND WE CAN'T BUILD THIS GARAGE AND THE AND THE AND THE HOTEL CAN'T, CAN'T GO UP BECAUSE OF THE GARAGE. MAYBE WE'RE COMING AT THIS FROM THE FRONT END. WE SHOULD BE COMING AT IT FROM THE BACK END AND TELL THEM HOW MUCH THEY'RE GOING TO LOSE VERSUS HOW MUCH THEY'RE GOING TO GAIN. LET ME TELL YOU WHERE IT STARTS FROM HERE, AND IT GOES DOWN FROM THERE. AND THEN WHEN YOU SAY 50 YEARS WORTH OF PARKING, WE'RE DONE. WELL, WE'VE GOT NOTHING TO GIVE YOU. YEAH, BUT BUT BUT, MR. RUSSO, THEY ALSO SAY, YOU KNOW, THE TWO DISTRICTS THAT IT'S TECHNICALLY IN SUPPORTED.
I THINK SOME OF THE OTHER COMMISSIONERS THINK, WELL, MY DISTRICT WE DON'T HAVE THIS.
I'M MORE CONCERNED ABOUT MY DISTRICT. SO I AGAIN, I THINK MORE PAROCHIAL THAN ANYTHING. I THINK SO, OKAY. I THINK MAYBE GO BACK AND SEE IF WE'LL SPLIT THE DIFFERENCE AT 25 AND THEN GO WITH OUR STAFF'S IDEAS DOWN THE ROAD. AFTER THE SUNSET OF THE CRA, MAYBE ON STREET
[03:50:06]
PREMIUM PARKING OR OR SOME SOMETHING FROM A PARKING MANAGEMENT PLAN. BUT IF YOU'RE DOING BUT THE PREMIUM PARKING ON THERE, HOW DO I WANT TO SAY WE'RE WE'RE. I'VE GOT TO TELL YOU. SLATE. THE PREMIUM PARKING I THINK IS FOR THE PREMIUM PARKING. THEY'RE NOT FOR THE PARKING GARAGE FOR THE STREET, BUT IT WOULD BE ALLOWED. I MEAN, WE COULD WE COULD DO THAT IF WE WANTED TO. I MEAN, YEAH, I UNDERSTAND THAT, BUT WE STILL GOT TO BE ABLE TO TO DO I JUST FIND EVEN 25 TO BE HARD. I REALLY FIND IT VERY HARD FOR US TO MAINTAIN IT. WHAT DO THEY SAY? HOW ARE WE GOING TO MAINTAIN IT AT THAT AT 50 YEARS? WELL, AGAIN, THE CITY ATTORNEY BROUGHT UP THE FACT THAT, YOU KNOW, AND I BELIEVE IT WAS YOU THAT, YOU KNOW, AN IDEA WOULD BE THE USER FEES AS OPPOSED TO THE THE TAX COMING OUT OF THE GENERAL FUND. I THINK THAT WAS MY POINT TO THE COUNTY COMMISSION. RIGHT, IS THAT WE'RE WE AT LEAST WITH THIS, WITH THIS PROPOSAL, THE PROPOSAL WE HAD MADE IN AUGUST, WE WERE GOING TO LIMIT THE COLLECTION OF REVENUES JUST TO THE AMOUNTS, YOU KNOW, ANTICIPATED FOR CAPITAL AND ANNUAL MAINTENANCE ON THE GARAGE AND THE AND AGAIN, THE GOAL BY HAVING FEES IS TO CAPTURE USER FEES, RIGHT. BECAUSE THEY MAY NOT ALL COME FROM BREVARD COUNTY, RIGHT.THERE'S SOME, YOU KNOW, FEE FEE IMPORTATION THAT'S AVAILABLE, RIGHT? WHERE WE'RE NOT JUST CHARGING BREVARD COUNTY RESIDENTS FOR, YOU KNOW, THE MAINTENANCE OF THE GARAGE, YOU KNOW, TO PAY THE PARKING FEES. I'LL BE I'LL BE THE FIRST ONE TO SAY ANYBODY DOES. AND SO AGAIN, RIGHT, IT'S IT'S I, IT'S A IT'S A DIFFICULT DECISION TO TO SAY, YES, WE WILL FOREGO FEES AND JUST HAVE GENERAL REVENUE PAY FOR THE MAINTENANCE OF THE GARAGE OR HAVE TO COME UP WITH A DIFFERENT METHOD FOR, FOR ITS UNDERLYING MAINTENANCE. AGAIN, RIGHT. IF WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A MIDDLE GROUND ON THE UNDERLYING TIME FRAME, WHERE, YOU KNOW, IF WE'RE IF WE'RE GOING INTO A, YOU KNOW, FAIRLY EXTENDED PERIOD OF FREE PARKING, 15, 20, 25 YEARS, YOU KNOW, I'M GOING TO SUGGEST THAT WE ALSO MODIFY THE A TIME FRAME TO WHERE WE RESTRICT THE UNDERLYING USES OF, OF THAT REVENUE OR HOW MUCH CAN BE COLLECTED. RIGHT. BECAUSE I DON'T WANT TO GIVE THAT AWAY FROM THE CITY'S PERSPECTIVE FOREVER FOR FOR THE COUNTY.
RIGHT. AND SO IF THERE'S A, IF THERE'S A MORE EXTENDED PERIOD OF HOW LONG, YOU KNOW, PARKING HAS TO BE FREE, THEN THEN THE COUNTY'S GOT TO GIVE A LITTLE BIT AND SAY, OKAY, THEN THERE'S A, THERE'S ONLY A TIME FRAME ON WHEN, YOU KNOW, FEES GET COLLECTED FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. AND AFTER THAT, THE COUNTY DOESN'T HAVE A SAY IN HOW FUTURE CITY COUNCILS CHOOSE HOW TO BUDGET AND DECIDE WHAT WHAT PARKING FEES ARE IN THE GARAGE. I SAY 15, BUT YEAH, WHEN WE DO START COLLECTING THE FEES, LIKE WHEN, WHEN IF THAT HAPPENS, WOULD THAT MONEY GO DIRECTLY TO US? CORRECT ALL OF IT. WE WOULDN'T HAVE TO SPLIT IT WITH THE WHAT IS LJ YEAH.
YEAH, THAT THAT WOULD BE WE WOULD BE WE'D BE TALKING ABOUT TERM TERM FEE PARKING FOR THE PUBLIC PARKING SPACES. OKAY. YEAH. PUBLIC PARKING SPACES. RIGHT. I MEAN, I THINK 15 YEARS BECAUSE AT THAT POINT IN TIME WE WILL HAVE TO DO MAINTENANCE, PERIOD. IT'LL BE A HEAVIER MAINTENANCE FEE. AND READING THE ROOM, I DON'T THINK THEY'RE GOING TO GO FOR THAT. I MEAN, I DON'T THINK THEY'RE GOING TO GO FOR THAT. I THINK IF I THINK IF WE WE START AT, SAY, 25 AND KNOWING OUR STAFF CAN DO A PREMIUM PARKING ON THE STREET TO CAPTURE, YOU KNOW, MAINTENANCE COSTS, MAYBE, AND THEN MAYBE EVEN GOING BACK LATER ON DOWN THE ROAD FOR A RENEGOTIATION WHEN WE CAN SHOW, YOU KNOW, THAT IT'S NEEDED, MAYBE WITH A DIFFERENT COMMISSION. BUT I CAN TELL YOU, FILLING IN THE I MEAN, IF THAT'S WHERE YOU'RE SAYING THE 25, NOT 50, THERE'S NO WAY, NO WAY THAT WE COULD DO 50. WELL, WE'LL WE CAN'T DO ANYTHING UNTIL WE GET IT. YEAH. IF KENNEDY. WHAT ARE YOU THINKING? THAT PART. RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. I LIKE THE IDEA OF THE PREMIUM PARKING. I KNOW GOING TO COCOA BEACH. PARKING IN THE PARKING GARAGE. YOU PAY, BUT IF YOU PARK ON THE STREET, YOU DON'T PAY, BUT YOU CAN ONLY STAY THERE 90 MINUTES. SO IT SORT OF FORCES PEOPLE INTO THAT GARAGE. I DON'T THINK WE CAN SUSTAIN PAYING FOR THE MAINTENANCE AND UPKEEP OF THAT GARAGE. IF WE'RE NOT CHARGING FOR EITHER THE ON STREET OR THE GARAGE ITSELF. SO WE HAVE TO DO ONE OR THE OTHER. 50 YEARS, I AGREE, COMPLETELY UNREASONABLE. I DON'T EVEN KNOW WHY THAT WENT INTO THE CONTRACT TO BEGIN WITH. I THINK IT WAS BECAUSE IT'S THE ONLY WAY TO GET THEM TO SAY YES. SO. 25 IS EVEN HARD. THE 25 IS HARD TO
[03:55:02]
SWALLOW, BUT I THINK IF WE DO THE 25, WE WOULD HAVE TO DO THE ON STREET PARKING OF SOME SORT.YEAH. AND MISS BASSETT, I AGREE WITH MISS 25. YEAH. BY 20 OR 25. BUT THE COMMISSION IS GOING TO TELL US WHAT THEY'RE GOING TO. THEY'RE GOING TO SEND IT BACK DOWN TO US, WHATEVER THEY WANT.
AND WE'RE GOING TO HAVE TO SAY YES OR NO IF THEY WANT. WELL, I MEAN, I DON'T HAVE TO GIVE US LIKE IT'S A HAGGLING THING. I'M PRETTY SURE IT'S GOING TO BE A THEY'RE GOING TO SEND IT DOWN AND IT'S A TAKE IT OR LEAVE IT. BUT 20 TO 25 I THINK FOR NEGOTIATING START AND AND CAN WE GO 20 OF THE GO FOR THAT. I GOT SO MANY IDEAS FLOWING THROUGH MY HEAD I'LL GO WITH THE CONSENSUS OF THE COUNCIL. BUT I STILL SAY THAT AFTER WE GET THIS THING DONE AND PUT TO BED, THAT WE GO OUT AND WE GET CORPORATE SPONSORSHIPS AND WE SELL THOSE, WE SELL FIVE OF THEM AT A TIME FOR $50,000 TO PARIS, TO GRUMMAN, SO THAT YOU HAVE IT FOR A YEAR OR TWO YEARS OR FIVE YEARS. WHAT? NEVERMIND. DEDICATED PARKING. DEDICATED PARKING. YEAH. I THINK WE NEED TO CALL THE APPLIANCE DIRECT GUY IN FOR NEGOTIATIONS. THERE YOU GO. HE CAN, BUT NO, I. SAM PACK. YEAH. SINCE ACCORDING TO THE CITY ATTORNEY FOR FIVE YEARS, I'M STILL WITH MY POINT WOULD BE IT'S GOT TO BE MAINTENANCE. SO I LOVE THE WAY SHE SAID EITHER PARKING GARAGE OR STREET. BUT THEN I THINK THAT WE COULD START AT TEN YEARS AND THEN NEGOTIATE FROM THAT POINT. BUT, BUT, BUT IF WE HAD A WAY TO PRESENT THEM A CASE STUDY, BECAUSE BEING THERE, I JUST DON'T THINK THAT THEY UNDERSTOOD THE NUMBERS. I JUST DON'T THINK FOR SOME REASON, I JUST A LOT OF CONCEPTS WERE BEING THROWN AROUND AND NOT REALLY. AND BUT I KNOW THEY GOT EXPERIENCE, BUT I THINK, I MEAN, OUR STAFF WAS, WERE PERFECTLY CLEAR. YEAH. WELL YEAH. BUT IT WAS VERY LITTLE NUMBERS THAT STILL CAME UP. BUT WHEN YOU WERE SAYING THAT, HOW LONG IS THE COCOA BEACH GARAGE BEEN UP FOR? FIVE YEARS NOW. NOT NO LONGER THAN THAT. DON'T EVEN WANT TO CROSS FROM HEIDI. YEAH, YEAH, I'M JUST TRYING TO FIGURE OUT IF WE COULD FIND OUT WHAT THEIR MAINTENANCE, WHAT THEIR MAINTENANCE IS ON THERE. I MEAN, WHAT THEY HAVE IN MAINTENANCE.
NOW, WHAT'S OUR MAINTENANCE HERE? YEAH, WE HAVE OURS. I MEAN, WE HAVE OUR OWN MAINTENANCE, SO WE DON'T HAVE TO GO OUTSIDE FOR A STUDY. WE CAN OPEN THE BOOKS. RUSS CAN TELL US EXACTLY HOW MUCH WE SPENT EVERY YEAR TO HAVE TWO HOURS. AND THEN ANOTHER ONE.
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
YEAH. SO WE'LL, WE'LL WE'LL GO BACK TO, TO COUNTY STAFF AGAIN. YOU KNOW COUNTY COMMISSIONERS CONTINUING THEIR DISCUSSION ON DECEMBER 2ND. AND DEPENDING ON HOW THAT GOES, WE MAY HAVE SOMETHING TO REPRESENT BOTH TO THE CRA AND TO CITY COUNCIL ON THE NINTH. OKAY. I'LL BE THERE ON TUESDAY NIGHT. OKAY. GOOD. YEAH. GOOD. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. I'M GOING TO MOVE ON TO ITEM
[C.21. Council Appointments for 2025-2026 a. Vice Mayor b. Airport Authority c. Space Coast League of Cities]
FOR 20 WAS ALREADY DONE. 2021 A CITY COUNCIL APPOINTMENT OF VICE MAYOR. YES, SIR. CITY COUNCIL NEEDS TO APPOINT A VICE MAYOR FOR 2025 2026. AND AS NOTED IN THE AGENDA PACKAGE, THE AUTHORITY FOR APPOINTMENT OF A VICE MAYOR IS FOUND IN THE CITY CHARTER AND THE COUNCIL'S RULES OF PROCEDURE. SO, AS WE NORMALLY DO, I WOULD ASK THAT YOU MAKE RECOMMENDATIONS OR NOMINATIONS FOR THE INDIVIDUAL TO SERVE AS VICE MAYOR, AND IF THERE ARE MULTIPLE, WE'LL TAKE A ROLL CALL, VOTE AND SELECT THE INDIVIDUAL THAT WAY. CAN I MAKE A NOMINATION? I NOMINATE JULIE KENNEDY. OKAY, I SECOND THAT OKAY, I VOTE I'VE NOMINATE ME. OKAY. ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? HOW ABOUT MR. LARUSSO? WHO IS IT, YOU OR ME? YOU? WELL, I'LL NOMINATE YOU. ALL RIGHT. THANK YOU. OKAY. ALL RIGHT, SO YOUR NOMINATING. I'M NOMINATE MYSELF NOW. OKAY. OKAY. SO THEN. ALL RIGHT, SO THE NOMINATION WE HAVE MISS KENNEDY, MR. LARUSSO. THAT'S CORRECT. OKAY. WE'LL DO A ROLL CALL. VOTE. SO WHEN I CALL YOUR NAME, YOU'LL SAY KENNEDY OR LARUSSO. YES. CLEAR.OKAY. GOOD. COUNCILMEMBER BASSETT. KENNEDY. COUNCILMEMBER HANLEY LARUSSO. COUNCILMEMBER.
[04:00:01]
KENNEDY. KENNEDY. COUNCILMEMBER. SMITH. KENNEDY. COUNCILMEMBER. LARUSSO. LARUSSO. VICE MAYOR NEWMAN. KENNEDY. MAYOR ALFREY. AND THAT WOULD BE KENNEDY. THEN SHE'S GOT THAT. VICE MAYOR, THANK YOU SO MUCH FOR YOUR SUPPORT. I'M HONORED. OKAY. ALL RIGHT. CONGRATULATIONS, VICE MAYOR. THANK YOU. ALL RIGHT. MOVING ON TO NUMBER 2021 B APPOINTMENT OF THREE MEMBERS.THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY BOARD. CORRECT. THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY CONSISTS OF SEVEN MEMBERS.
THREE OF THOSE MEMBERS ARE MEMBERS OF THE CITY COUNCIL WHO ARE APPOINTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL. THE REPRESENTATIVES CURRENTLY ON THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY ARE PAUL ALFRED, DAVID NEWMAN AND MARK LARUSSO. ALL THREE OF THEIR TERMS WILL EXPIRE ON DECEMBER 11TH, AND ALL THREE HAVE INDICATED THEIR DESIRE TO BE REAPPOINTED. I WILL POINT OUT THAT THE SPACE COAST TPO POLICIES OR BYLAWS, HOWEVER YOU WANT TO CALL THEM, REQUIRE ONE MEMBER OF THE TPO TO BE A MEMBER OF THE MELBOURNE AIRPORT AUTHORITY. CURRENTLY, MR. LARUSSO IS AN ALTERNATE ON THE TPO AND IS THE ONLY OTHER INDIVIDUAL IS THE ONLY INDIVIDUAL ON THAT BOARD THAT IS A MEMBER OF THE AIRPORT AUTHORITY. SO I'D ASK YOU TO TAKE THAT INTO CONSIDERATION.
AND FOLLOWING THE SAME PROCESS, YOU COULD SIMPLY NOMINATE THE THREE INDIVIDUALS AND WE'LL MAKE A MOTION TO DO THAT. OR IF THERE ARE OTHER NOMINATIONS, WE'LL FOLLOW THE SAME PROCESS AS WE DID FOR VICE MAYOR. GO AHEAD. MA'AM, I THINK THAT THE THREE THAT ARE CURRENTLY ON THE BOARD ARE DOING A GREAT JOB IN REPRESENTING US WELL, SO I'D LIKE TO NOMINATE ALL THREE TO STAY ON THE BOARD, I SECOND IT. OKAY. ANY OTHER NOMINATIONS? OKAY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THAT MOTION PASSES. AND ITEM C VOTING APPOINTMENT, VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE VOTING DELEGATE TO SPACE COAST LEAGUE OF CITY. OH, SORRY. GO AHEAD, GO AHEAD. SO, YES, FOR THE 2025 CALENDAR YEAR, MISS BASSETT SERVED AS A VOTING DELEGATE AND MR. SMITH SERVED AS THE ALTERNATE. SO WE'RE SELECTING THE VOTING DELEGATE AND ALTERNATE FOR 2026. I'D LIKE TO STAY THE DELEGATE. WOULD YOU LIKE TO SAY DELEGATE? YEAH, I CAN SECOND THAT. SO IF THERE ARE NO OTHER NOMINATIONS FOR THE VOTING DELEGATE, WE'D TAKE A MOTION TO REAPPOINT MISS BASSETT. OKAY, MOTION A SECOND AND YOU SECOND. THAT SECOND.
OKAY. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THAT MOTION PASSES. THANKS, GUYS.
MOVING ON TO. THEN WE'LL NEED AN ALTERNATE AS WELL. SO MR. SMITH IS CURRENTLY THE ALTERNATE. DO YOU WANT TO ALTERNATE. YEAH. OKAY. SO THE ALTERNATE WE HAVE A MOTION FOR MR. SMITH. YEAH OKAY. WE HAVE A SECOND. I'LL SECOND AND THEN. OKAY. WE HAVE A MOTION. SECOND.
ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? VOTE AYE. AND THAT MOTION PASSES. MOVING ON TO
[C.22. Board Appointments a. Melbourne Housing Authority b. Zoning Board of Adjustment]
ITEM NUMBER 22, A MR. MCEWEN. SIR, THIS IS REAPPOINTMENTS TO THE MELBOURNE HOUSING AUTHORITY.THE TERMS OF TWO OF THE MEMBERS WILL EXPIRE IN DECEMBER. AND ADDITIONALLY, WE HAVE ONE OUTSIDE APPLICANT TO FILL THE ONE VACANT SEAT. AS YOU'LL RECALL, THE MELBOURNE HOUSING AUTHORITY MEMBERS ARE APPOINTED BY THE MAYOR AND COUNCIL. MINISTERIALLY APPROVES THE MAYOR'S APPOINTMENTS, AND SO THE MAYOR HAS CHOSEN TO REAPPOINT JUDITH DOYLE AND ALAN PARENTEAU AND APPOINT FELICIA PRINCE. I BELIEVE. I'M SORRY, FELICIA SMITH. FELICIA PRINCE IS ALREADY ON THE BOARD, AND SO THE RECOMMENDED ACTION WOULD BE TO REAPPOINT THOSE TWO MEMBERS AND APPOINT AND APPROVE THE MAYOR'S REAPPOINTMENT OF THOSE TWO MEMBERS AND THE APPOINTMENT OF THE NEW MEMBER. SO MOVED SECOND, OKAY, WITH MOTION. SECOND, ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. AYE. ANY OPPOSED? VOTE AYE. MOTION PASSES. MOVING TO 22 B FOR MEMBERS OF THE ZONING BOARD OF ADJUSTMENTS. YES, SIR. THE TERMS OF MR. HERBERT, MISS CASS, MR. BEAUREGARD AND MISS MAYNARD WILL EXPIRE IN DECEMBER. ALL FOUR HAVE EXPRESSED A DESIRE TO BE REAPPOINTED. AND WE DO HAVE ONE OUTSIDE APPLICANT WHO CAN FILL A VACANCY ON THAT BOARD. SO AS WE NORMALLY DO, WE'LL ASK YOU TO REAPPOINT THE CURRENT MEMBERS. THE FIRST ALTERNATE WOULD BE MOVED INTO THE VACANT REGULAR MEMBER SEAT. AND THEN WE WOULD ASK YOU TO APPOINT THE OUTSIDE APPLICANT AS AN ALTERNATE MEMBER. AND SO IF YOU'D LIKE ME TO READ THAT, IT WOULD BE TO REAPPOINT THOMAS HERBERT AND LINDA CASS AS REGULAR MEMBERS, APPOINT DAVE BRAINARD AS A REGULAR MEMBER, REAPPOINT DIANE MAYNARD AS AN ALTERNATE MEMBER, AND APPOINT JARED MOYLES AS AN ALTERNATE MEMBER. SO MOVED. SECOND. MOTION SECOND. ALL THOSE IN FAVOR SAY AYE. ANY OPPOSED? THAT MOTION PASSES. OKAY. I THINK THAT WOULD BE OKAY. WE'RE GOOD ON TIME. OKAY, WE'RE
[D. PETITIONS, REMONSTRANCES, AND COMMUNICATIONS]
MOVING ON TO PETITIONS AND COMMUNICATIONS. START OUT WITH YOU, MR. NEWMAN. SO I HONESTLY, THE ONLY THING I WANT TO TALK ABOUT IS I DO NOT. THE FIRST THING THAT I HAPPENED WHEN I BECAME THE VICE MAYOR WAS THE FIRST VOTE WAS FOR VICE MAYOR. AND I THINK IS A VERY DIVISIVE PROCESS WHERE THE FIRST THING COMING ON IS A POPULARITY CONTEST. I REALLY DON'T LIKE IT.[04:05:02]
I JUST THINK IT'S, YOU KNOW, MY VOTE HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH ANY OF THAT. IT REALLY HAS TO DO WITH WE. I THINK THAT THIS WOULD BE MORE APPROPRIATE TO BE ON THE BALLOT. I JUST THINK IT ENDS UP IN RECENT YEARS BECOMING A THIS OR THAT OR WHATEVER, HAVE YOU. SO I WANT TO SEE IF COUNCIL HAD ANY APPETITE TO SEE IF MR. CONLEY COULD PUT A SOMETHING TOGETHER, WHAT IT WOULD LOOK LIKE TO PUT THAT ON THE BALLOT. I JUST THINK THAT WOULD MAKE US, INSTEAD OF HAVING TO FIGHT OVER THIS AND THAT, WHO GETS THIS? WHO GETS THAT? IT WOULD BRING MORE UNITY TO THE BOARD. AND I WANT MORE UNITY, A BALLOT. HOW? WELL, YOU COULD PUT THE VICE MAYOR POSITION ON THE BALLOT AS AN ELECTED OFFICE, BUT THEN YOU WOULD HAVE TO DO AN ELECTION EVERY YEAR. NO, NO, NO, IT WOULD BE A FOUR YEAR TERM. YOU COULD DO A FOUR YEAR TERM JUST LIKE ANYTHING ELSE. HEY, I'D TAKE OUT MY SEAT FOR IT. AND, YOU KNOW, THEY REARRANGE IT ALL.SO IT'S STILL SEVEN PEOPLE. ELECTIONS ARE OVERLAPPING THE TWO AND TWO. SO SOMEBODY TECHNICALLY WOULDN'T BE. THAT'S WHAT I SAID. I'D HAVE TO EITHER GIVE. RIGHT. LIKE LIKE I COULD GIVE MY SEAT UP AND THEN IT WOULD BE RESTRUCTURED IN THAT WAY. I THINK IT COMPLICATES THINGS. I UNDERSTAND WHERE YOU'RE COMING FROM. SURE. YEAH. BUT I THINK IT COMPLICATES A LOT. I ALSO THINK THAT THAT DISALLOWS AND DISENGAGES ALL THE OTHER COUNCIL MEMBERS WHO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO BECOME A VICE MAYOR, WHO HAVE THE OPPORTUNITY TO TAKE ON OTHER ADDITIONAL ROLES. AND SO NOT BECAUSE IT'S ALWAYS BEEN THAT WAY, BUT BECAUSE I KNOW I WAS VICE MAYOR THREE TIMES. YEAH, SURE. I MEAN, SO AND THEN IT ROLLS AND IT ROLLS AND EVERYBODY BRINGS A DIFFERENT PERSPECTIVE TO THAT ROLE. SO I GET THAT I, I WOULD NOT I WOULD NOT I GET IT, I JUST, I JUST DON'T THINK IT'S A IT'S A HEALTHY PROCESS. I WAS HOPING THAT THERE MIGHT BE A SOLUTION THERE. WE HAVE A SOLUTION. WELL, WELL IT'S PICKING AND CHOOSING.
THAT'S WHAT THE SOLUTION IS. WELL, WE COULD NAME MR. NEWMAN TO YOUR POINT. IF YOU WANTED TO DO A DIFFERENT SORT OF PROCESS, THEN THAT'S ONE THING. I'M NOT SURE THE BALLOT IS THE WAY TO GO, BECAUSE I THINK THAT WOULD JUST I THINK IT'D BE TOO COMPLICATED AS FAR AS THE ELECTION CYCLES. SURE. OKAY. BUT JUST THROWING THINGS OUT THERE LIKE I DO, MAYBE A ROLLING LIKE IT'S IT GOES FROM ONE DISTRICT ONE, THEN TWO, THEN THREE, THEN FIVE, THEN WHAT. YOU KNOW, IT GOES IN SUCCESSION TO SOMETHING LIKE THAT. SO THEN EVERYBODY TO MR. RUSSO'S POINT. COUNCILMAN RUSSO, SORRY WILL GET AN OPPORTUNITY. SURE. RIGHT. AND TO BE A VICE MAYOR. BUT IT'LL JUST ROLL. AND TO THAT POINT, I'M SORRY. NO, GO AHEAD TO THAT POINT. WE CHANGED THE WAY THAT WE VOTED BACK IN 2008 OR 2007, AS IT ALWAYS STARTED WITH NUMBER ONE AND THEN WENT RIGHT DOWN THE LINE, RIGHT DOWN THE LINE. AND SO IT NEVER ROTATED THAT WAY UNTIL WE FIGURED OUT THAT, YOU KNOW WHAT, SOME OF THESE VOTES ARE VERY CONTROVERSIAL, YOU KNOW, ESPECIALLY IN A TIME WHEN IT WAS MASSIVE GROWTH IN THE CITY AND DEVELOPER AGAINST DEVELOPER AND COUNCILMEMBER AGAINST COUNCILMEMBER. SO THE FIRST VOTE WOULD GENERALLY CARRY MOSTLY THE WHOLE THE WHOLE BOARD. SO WE DECIDED THAT IT WOULD CHANGE. SO HE VOTED FIRST TONIGHT, THEN I'LL VOTE FIRST THE NEXT DAY, AND SO ON AND SO FORTH. AND IT KEPT ROTATING THAT WAY. THAT'S HOW WE GOT TO THIS POINT. SO I THINK THAT'S A GOOD IDEA THOUGH.
AND AND TO YOUR POINT, MISS KENNEDY, VICE MAYOR KENNEDY, YOU KNOW, THERE ARE SIX DISTRICTS. I MEAN, DO YOU LOSE A DISTRICT? AND IF YOU WENT IF YOU MADE A VICE MAYOR, THEN WHERE WOULD THAT EVEN COME FROM? I MEAN, YOU KNOW, YOU TO ME, I LIKE THE THE ROLLING OR ROTATING. THAT WOULDN'T BE A BAD IDEA. SO EVERYBODY GETS GETS THAT. OKAY. SO NEXT YEAR, NUMBER ONE, WELL WOULD THERE HAVE TO BE A HOW WOULD THAT WORK KEVIN OR JENNY. WOULD THAT BE A POLICY CHANGE. OR SO THE SO THE SO THE CHARTER SAYS THAT THE COUNCIL CAN ELECT FROM ITS MEMBERSHIP A VICE MAYOR WHO SERVES AS THE MAYOR IN THE ABSENCE OF THE MAYOR. AND THEN THE SELECTION PROCESS IS IN COUNCIL'S RULE OF PROCEDURES. IT MAY JUST BE LATE, BUT I'M TRYING TO THINK OF WHEN IT'S A COUNCIL MEMBER'S TURN WHOSE TERM IS UP. AND DO DO WE SKIP THAT PERSON? I'M JUST TRYING TO THINK OF LOGISTICALLY HOW THAT WORKS WITH ELECTIONS AND AND THAT PROCESS IS UP. AND SHE'S THE VICE MAYOR. ALSO REMEMBER WE'RE TALKING ABOUT A ROTATION.
TRY AND GIVE EVERYONE AN OPPORTUNITY. BUT BUT DEPENDING ON WHERE THAT ROTATION IS BASED ON ELECTIONS, YOU MAY BE IN A PARTICULAR DISTRICT WHERE YOUR FOUR YEAR TERM DOESN'T GET DOESN'T GET TO YOU. RIGHT. SO I WANT TO DISSUADE PEOPLE FROM THE IDEA THAT OVER A FOUR YEAR TERM, YOU'RE GUARANTEED AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE VICE MAYOR. WELL, NO ONE'S GUARANTEED. NO, NO, NO DOUBT I JUST. RIGHT. LIKE WITH SIX DISTRICTS IN FOUR YEAR TERMS, A AN AUTOMATIC ROTATION ALSO DOESN'T GUARANTEE THAT OPPORTUNITY. THAT'S TRUE. YEAH. GOOD POINT. OKAY. ALL RIGHT, MISS BASSETT. WHAT? OH, ANYTHING TONIGHT. SO I GO FIRST. NO, NO. OKAY, SO I KNOW THIS IS A VERY SENSITIVE TOPIC, BUT IT KEEPS COMING UP. SO IN THE ISSUE OR IN THE INTEREST OF
[04:10:07]
TRANSPARENCY FOR THE CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY. WHAT WHAT ARE WE DOING ABOUT THE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY ISSUE? BECAUSE SILENCE RIGHT NOW IS DOING A LOT MORE HARM THAN GOOD.I DON'T THINK WE CAN ACTUALLY I CAN I CAN ADDRESS THAT. TO MY UNDERSTANDING. THERE'S BEEN A COMPLAINT FILED WITH THE ETHICS. AT LEAST THAT'S WHAT I'VE BEEN TOLD. AND THAT'S FINE. I'M OKAY WITH THAT. OKAY. OKAY. THAT'S IT. SO. YEAH. SURE. OKAY. SO WE WHEN THE FIRST LIKE TO GO BACK TO WAS THAT MAY APRIL MAY, MAY WHEN THE FIRST WHEN THE SUBMITTAL WAS MADE FOR THE CHECK FOR HABITAT FOR HUMANITY. YOU KNOW, FOR THE PAYMENT, THE INVOICE. WE DID A REVIEW AT THAT TIME BECAUSE THEY SUBMITTED THEIR, THEIR, YOU KNOW, WHAT THEIR REIMBURSABLES WERE. WE REVIEWED IT. AND AT THAT TIME WE WE ACKNOWLEDGED THAT IT DID NOT VIOLATE THE ARPA REGULATIONS DIDN'T. SO IT DID NOT VIOLATE THE FEDERAL REGULATIONS. SO WE PAID WE PAID HABITAT FOR HUMANITY THEIR FULL AMOUNT. WHEN THIS CAME UP AGAIN, WE DID A VERY, VERY THOROUGH REVIEW. I THINK MAYBE I NEED A FOURTH, THIRD OR FOURTH VARY IN THERE. I HAD WE HAD MULTIPLE PEOPLE LOOKING AT IT. THE CITY MANAGER'S OFFICE WAS LOOKING AT IT, THE CITY ATTORNEY'S OFFICE WAS LOOKING AT THE FINANCE DEPARTMENT WAS LOOKING. WE DID A DEEP DIVE, ENDED UP COMING TO THE SAME CONCLUSION FROM MULTIPLE SOURCES THAT WE MET THE FEDERAL REQUIREMENTS, WE MET THE ARPA REQUIREMENTS. SO WE'RE GOOD ON THAT. ON THAT SIDE, DESPITE WHAT'S BEING SAID.
SO THEN WE TOOK IT A STEP FURTHER AND I LOOKED AT WHAT WAS THE THE AGREEMENT WITH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY. THE ACTUAL AGREEMENT THAT WE SIGNED WITH THEM. NOW, WHEN WE PUT THAT OUT FOR AN RFA REQUEST FOR APPLICATIONS, THERE WERE CRITERIA IN THERE, BECAUSE IF YOU RECALL, WHEN THOSE ARPA PROJECTS CAME OUT, THE FINAL RULE FOR ARPA WASN'T SOLIDIFIED YET. SO WE YOU KNOW, THAT WAS A MOVING TARGET FOR A WHILE. SO WHEN WE PUT THAT OUT, WE INCLUDED SOME ADDITIONAL FORMS THAT USUALLY ARE INVOLVED WITH CDBG OR HUD PROJECTS. AND SO PART OF THOSE FORMS THEY FILLED OUT WERE INCLUDED AND REFERENCED TO IN THE AGREEMENT THAT WAS LATER SIGNED BY HABITAT. SO IN THAT THAT ADDITIONAL REVIEW, WE DETERMINED THAT THERE WAS A POSSIBILITY OF A DEFAULT OF THE CONTRACT. SO AS WE FOLLOWED OUR STANDARD PROCEDURES, WE ISSUED A LETTER. I DON'T I DON'T KNOW IF I HAVE ALL THIS INFORMATION WITH ME, BUT WE ISSUED A LETTER TO HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AND MACEDONIA COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, AND WE GAVE THEM THAT. THERE WERE SOME CONFLICTS IN THERE, AND WE GAVE THEM THE OPPORTUNITY, OPPORTUNITY TO CURE THE SITUATION. AND AS OF YESTERDAY, OH, CINDY ALREADY LEFT. AS OF YESTERDAY, THEY HABITAT FOR HUMANITY HAD CURED THE DEFAULT. AND SO THEY ARE NO LONGER THEY'RE NOT CONSIDERED IN DEFAULT. AND THEY THAT THEY MET THE TERMS OF THE AGREEMENT.
I DON'T KNOW IF YOU WANT TO ADD TO THAT, ADAM. WELL THAT'S THAT'S ONE THAT'S ONE ASPECT OF, OF THIS ISSUE. RIGHT. WAS IN, IN UNDERSTANDING BETTER WHAT WHAT HAD HAPPENED AND, AND A REVIEW OF THE CONTRACT, DID WE HAVE ANY ISSUE WITH OUR CONTRACT WITH, WITH THE FEDERAL GUIDELINES. RIGHT. THAT'S THAT'S OUR THE CITY'S RELATIONSHIP WITH, WITH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY. RIGHT. AND THEN YOU AND THEN YOU START GETTING SEPARATELY INTO THESE, YOU KNOW, THESE ALLEGATIONS OF UNETHICAL CONDUCT BY, BY THE MAYOR, BY, BY AN INDIVIDUAL COUNCIL MEMBER, RIGHT. IN IN MY INITIAL REVIEW OF THAT, THERE IS AT LEAST A CHAIN OF COMMISSION ON ETHICS OPINIONS THAT IS SUGGESTING THAT THE NATURE OF THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN THE MAYOR, HIS ROOFING COMPANY, HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AND THE CITY ISN'T NECESSARILY A A A CONFLICTING CONTRACTUAL RELATIONSHIP. RIGHT. AND SO, AGAIN, YOU KNOW, THERE HAVE BEEN REQUESTS, THERE HAVE BEEN DEMANDS FOR THE CITY TO, YOU KNOW, LODGE COMPLAINTS, DO INVESTIGATIONS, OTHER THINGS.
RIGHT. YOU KNOW, MY BASED ON MY UNDERSTANDING OF OF HOW THE COMMISSION ON ETHICS IS LOOKING
[04:15:01]
AT THOSE ETHICAL STANDARDS, IT'S NOT DEFINITIVE THAT THAT THEY WOULD SEE IT AS, AS A VIOLATION. TO BE ABLE TO FILE A COMPLAINT REQUIRES A NOTARIZED AND UNDER OATH STATEMENT OF FACTS AS TO HOW, YOU KNOW, A PERSON BELIEVES THAT A VIOLATION OF THOSE ETHICS STANDARDS HAS OCCURRED. BASED ON THE INFORMATION THAT I HAVE, I WOULDN'T FEEL, YOU KNOW, READY TO, YOU KNOW, SWEAR UNDER OATH, LIKE, HERE'S HERE'S EXACTLY HOW THIS ETHICAL VIOLATION OCCURRED. NOW, YOU KNOW, AS TO, YOU KNOW, WHEN YOU HEARD FROM MR. COLUMBO, FROM, YOU KNOW, PREVIOUS YOU KNOW, HE HAD HE WAS COMING TO THE CONCLUSION THAT THERE HAD TO HAVE BEEN A VOTING CONFLICT OF INTEREST, EVEN AT THE TIME, IN JUNE OF 2024. RIGHT. SOME EXISTING RELATIONSHIP OR SOME QUID PRO QUO BETWEEN ALFRED ROOFING AND THE MAYOR AND SPACE COAST HABITAT FOR HUMANITY? I'M NOT I'M NOT AWARE OF ANY OF THOSE FACTS INDIVIDUALLY. AND SO AGAIN. RIGHT. THAT WOULD BE IF IF OTHER PEOPLE HAVE OTHER INFORMATION THAT WOULD SUGGEST THAT TYPE OF ETHICAL VIOLATION, THEN, YOU KNOW, THEY'RE IN A BETTER POSITION THAN I AM TO SUBMIT THAT TO COMMISSION ON ETHICS FOR FOR FURTHER REVIEW AND EVALUATION. SO AGAIN, RIGHT FROM FROM THE CITY'S PERSPECTIVE, OUR REVIEW ADDRESSED OUR CONTRACTUAL ISSUE WITH HABITAT FOR HUMANITY AS TO ALLEGATIONS OF UNETHICAL CONDUCT BY BY THE MAYOR. THOSE ARE REALLY BEST EVALUATED BY THE ORGANIZATION THAT'S RESPONSIBLE FOR THAT AS THE COMMISSION ON ETHICS. AND SO, AGAIN, RIGHT IN AS I UNDERSTAND THE FACTS, AND I MAY NOT HAVE ALL THE FACTS RIGHT, I WILL MAKE THAT CAVEAT, BUT ON MY UNDERSTANDING OF OF WHAT WHAT I CAN SEE THROUGH THE DOCUMENTATION, WHAT WAS SUBMITTED, THE DOCUMENTATION THAT THAT THE CITY HAS, IT'S NOT IT'S NOT CRYSTAL CLEAR TO ME THAT THERE'S BEEN AN ETHICAL VIOLATION. RIGHT. AND SO I'M RELUCTANT TO SUBMIT SOMETHING TO A COMMISSION ON ETHICS MYSELF. AND THAT'S MY REPORT TO YOU OF, OF KIND OF WHERE WE'RE AT. AND ACTUALLY I'M GOING TO FILL SOME MORE INFORMATION IN, AND I'LL BE GLAD TO SEND COUNCIL THIS. AND AGAIN, I WANT TO BE VERY SENSITIVE BECAUSE THERE IS MORE PENDING LITIGATION COMING UP IN REGARDS TO THIS FOR FOR EXAMPLE, AND I'M GOING TO BRING THIS ONE THING AND I'M WHEN, WHEN THIS WHEN THIS GETS SUBMITTED THE AND I WOULD SAY AND IN MY OPINION THE PAID AGITATOR WHO WHO IS COME COME HERE SEVERAL TIMES IS IN WORKING IN, IN COORDINATION AND IN COORDINATION WITH MY SISTER IN LAW WHO I HAVE A LAWSUIT WITH. NOW, I WILL PRESENT THIS AND I'LL BE GLAD TO SEND IT TO YOU ON OCTOBER BE OCTOBER 23RD, 2025. MY, SHE'S A BOOKKEEPER.WENT AND PULLED THE CHECKS FROM OUR OUR OUR ACCOUNT. I'M FINE WITH THAT. I HAVE NO PROBLEM WITH THAT. THE ISSUE THAT I HAVE IS AN UNREDACTED. CHECKS WITHIN AN HOUR WERE SENT TO ME BY THE YOUTUBER, SO MY SISTER IN LAW MUST HAVE SENT IT TO HIM WITHIN THE HOUR AND HE SENDS IT BACK. PAUL, YOU NEED TO RESIGN. THAT'S NOT YOU KNOW, INSTEAD OF ASKING, HEY, WHAT'S GOING ON, PAUL? YOU NEED TO RESIGN. AND THEN HIS COMMENT IS 100% A PIECE OF MOVE EFFING LOSER TO ME. AND AS WELL AS AND I WILL PRESENT THIS TO THE ETHICS COMMISSION IF IT MAKES THEIR IF YOU LOOK AT THE PERSON'S NAME ON THE CONTRACT. JAY MILLER, WE BROUGHT HIM IN FOR A WHILE TO HELP OUT WHEN MY BROTHER GOT SICK AND SOME OTHER THINGS. BUT THE TEXT MESSAGE BETWEEN ME AND HIM, HE EVEN ACKNOWLEDGES THAT HE WAS INVOLVED. I WASN'T INVOLVED IN THE DAY TO DAY OPERATIONS, MAYBE AS MUCH AS I SHOULD HAVE BEEN, BUT THEY WERE HIS THING TO CHORES AND I WASN'T EVEN AWARE THEY WERE DONE. AND AGAIN, GIVEN THIS TO THE ATTORNEY, WE WILL BE RESPONDING. THERE'S MORE LITIGATION COMING ON THIS BECAUSE I'VE BEEN ACCUSED OF NUMEROUS THINGS BECAUSE IN MY OPINION, I WILL NOT GIVE HALF OF MY COMPANY UP TO MY SISTER IN LAW. SO AS SHE'S TOLD NUMEROUS PEOPLE, BAD THINGS ARE COMING OUT ABOUT YOU. SO I'M NOT GOING TO BE EXTORTED. BRING IT. AND AGAIN, MY ATTORNEY, MY LEGAL TEAM WILL BE HANDLING THAT MORE PEOPLE. AND LIKE I SAID, BE GLAD. AND AND I THANK YOU FOR BRINGING THAT UP BECAUSE THAT'S THE ELEPHANT ON THE DAIS. AND AGAIN, I APPRECIATE THAT. AND ONCE THIS GETS MOVING, I'LL BE GLAD TO KEEP COUNCIL UPDATED THAT THAT THAT BUSINESS I HAD DECIDED AFTER MY BROTHER PASSED AWAY THAT BUSINESS IS BEING LIQUIDATED. AND MR. COLOMBO, I
[04:20:02]
WASN'T HERE AT THE TIME. I WAS ON A SCHEDULED VACATION AND THEN I HAD ANOTHER EVENT. SO I WAS ACCUSED OF DODGING OR NOT COMING. BUT WE'VE ALL BEEN TO OTHER EVENTS AND HAS TO DEAL WITH TPO OR SOMETHING. BUT YOU KNOW, I FIND IT INTERESTING THAT AGAIN, IN MY OPINION, A PAID AGITATOR WOULD COME IN BECAUSE I AND WORK WITH MY SISTER IN LAW BECAUSE AGAIN, MY OPINION, BECAUSE I WON'T GIVE UP HALF OF MY COMPANY, I'M NOT GOING TO BE EXTORTED. I'LL SEE THEM IN COURT. ANYBODY HAVE ANY OTHER QUESTIONS? AND I'D BE GLAD TO SEND THAT INFORMATION TO COUNCIL TOMORROW. OKAY. AND BUT I APPRECIATE YOU BRINGING THAT UP. GO AHEAD. OKAY. MY QUESTION IS WHERE WAS MR. JACKSON TONIGHT AFTER 50 YEARS? THAT WAS ONE OF MY QUESTIONS.WHERE HE WASN'T HERE TONIGHT TO GET HIS MR. MR. JACKSON, I HEARD HE WAS SUPPOSED TO BE HERE, BUT HE. IT WAS PULLED TILL NEXT MEETING. OKAY, I WAS WONDERING, YOU KNOW, USUALLY HE SHOWS UP. OH, I AGREE, I HOPE I HOPE HE'S FEELING WELL. YEAH. AFTER THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING, I WENT TO THE RIVERVIEW PARK WHERE THE FOOD NOT BOMB PEOPLE WERE GIVING OUT FOOD, AND IT WAS VERY DIFFERENT. THERE WAS A LOT OF IT WASN'T YOUNGER PEOPLE, IT WAS PEOPLE 65 AND OLDER GETTING FOOD. I WAS, YOU KNOW, AT THAT SITTING THERE WATCHING IT, YOU KNOW, IT WASN'T PEOPLE COMING IN, CARS GETTING THEIR FOOD AND THEN LEAVING. I WAS REALLY KIND OF SHOCKED BY BY THE DIFFERENT CROWD OF PEOPLE THAT THEY'RE GETTING NOW. IT'S NOT A YOUNGER CROWD. IT'S A LOT OLDER CROWD. YEAH, YEAH. I MEAN, BECAUSE THEY DO GIVE A HEARTY MEAL AND THINGS LIKE THAT. SO THAT WAS KIND OF A BIG SHOCKER. THERE SEEMED TO GET OLDER PEOPLE. IT'S NOT THE YOUNGER, YOUNGER ONES AND ALL THAT QUESTION I HAVE I DON'T MEAN TO CUT YOU OFF. WHAT'S YOUR THE WAY THE PROCESS WORKED. WAS IT GOOD. YEAH. I MEAN I MEAN WHAT'S YOUR EVALUATION? THEY'RE VERY MUCH VERY CONSCIENTIOUS TO BE. THEY, THEY, THEY HELP A LOT OF PEOPLE. SOME PEOPLE I WOULD SAY IS NEURODIVERSE, I THINK. AND SOME OF THE PEOPLE THERE, THEY LIKE TO HELP. THEY, THEY WANT TO BE DOING THINGS THEY LOVE. THERE ARE CERTAIN PEOPLE, THERE'S DIFFERENT ONES THAT LIKE CLEANING UP THE PARK. SO WHEN SOMEBODY'S LEAVING SOMETHING, I IT'S NOT THEM LEAVING THINGS BEHIND. IT WAS VERY INTERESTING BECAUSE THE GARBAGE CANS WHEN MY, WHEN I, BEFORE THEY WERE SERVING, THEY WERE ALREADY FLOWING OVER AS BEFORE PEOPLE EVEN CAME THERE.
AND THEY PICK IT UP AND THEY DO THEIR THINGS. BUT I WAS REALLY SHOCKED ABOUT HOW MANY OLDER PEOPLE ARE GOING THERE NOW. IT'S NOT A YOUNGER CROWD, IT'S THE OLDER CROWD. WE WE REALLY KIND OF HAVE TO LOOK AT THAT. WHO'S NOT? THEY'RE NOT DOING ANYTHING WRONG. BUT ARE WE UNDERSERVING THE OLDER PEOPLE IN IN THE AREA AND ARE THEY PICKING IT UP? ARE THEY PICKING UP THAT AREA, PICKING THAT UP? THAT WAS ONE OF THOSE THAT THAT REALLY SHOCKED ME. I DIDN'T GO THIS PAST WEEKEND, BUT THAT THAT JUST SEEMED TO BE A SHOCK I DID. I WANT TO GO BACK TO THE MRC MEETING CERTAIN THINGS. I AGREE WITH THEM, CERTAIN THINGS I DON'T, THE COST OF THINGS.
THEY HAD THESE SWELLS AND THEY WERE LIKE USING, I CALL THEM SWELLS FOR DRAINING WITH WATER AND ALL THAT. AND THEY HAD NATURAL PLANTS. IT SOUNDS GREAT, BUT YOU HAVE, YOU KNOW, LIKE IF WE HAVE A HEAVY RAIN, WE ALL KNOW THAT THE PAPER'S GOING TO GET IN THERE. ALL SORTS OF JUNK IS GOING TO GET IN THERE. WHO'S GOING TO MAINTAIN THOSE THINGS? BUT WHAT PALM BAY, THEY'RE HAD SOME OF THEIR PEOPLE THERE, THEIR CREWS AND ALL THAT. THEY SAID, WHY ARE WE DOING THOSE THINGS? WHY NOT TAKE IN SOME OF THE NATURAL SWELL AREAS AND JUST KEEP IT THE NATURAL, THE WHERE IT IS ALREADY NOT SIT THERE AND REPLANT THINGS SO THAT IT DOESN'T HAVE A WHOLE LOT OF MAINTENANCE IN THERE, BECAUSE WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH. EVEN ON OUR PARKS AND REC, WE'VE GOT WE DON'T HAVE ENOUGH PEOPLE WORKING THERE IN THE TIME PERIOD. THAT'S WHAT. AND THIS PAST FRIDAY, I GOT TO READ 21 PROPOSALS FOR THE OPIOID. OH OH YEAH, IT WAS A LOT OF FUN.
SOME OF THEM WERE THICK, SOME OF THEM WERE FOR NO. BUT I KNOW WE HAVE TO DO. I WOULD SAY OUR STAFF, AFTER GOING THROUGH THESE RFAS, OUR STAFF IS SO MUCH BETTER ORGANIZED THAT COMPARED TO THE COUNTY. DO I THINK THAT WE HAD ALMOST FIVE AND A ALMOST $6 MILLION TO GIVE AWAY? I DON'T THINK IT'S GOING TO HAPPEN. I THINK THERE'S GOING TO BE SOME. PULLING OR
[04:25:06]
PROTESTING. THAT'S THE PROTESTING. I DON'T THINK THAT'S GOING TO GO HAPPEN, BUT THERE ARE SOME REALLY GOOD PEOPLE WANT THINGS. THERE WAS ONE PERSON IN ONE PERSON IN THERE SAID THAT DOCTORS DON'T NEED TO GIVE OPIOIDS AWAY. WE JUST NEED TO TAKE TYLENOL WITH PAIN. YEAH, I KNOW AS THE MAYOR HAD HIS BACK PROBLEM GOING, YEAH, YOU ONLY NEED TYLENOL.DID YOU KNOW THAT? I WISH I'D KNOWN THAT THEN. YEAH, I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF TYLENOL THAT CAN EAT IT, BUT IT WAS VERY INTERESTING SITUATION THERE. SO THOSE ARE THOSE ARE THE ONES.
SO BUT WE DO NEED TO LOOK AT OUR OPIOIDS. THERE'S SOME REALLY GOOD PROGRAMS I DON'T WANT TO MENTION THEM THAT A LOT OF IT THE WHAT GOT USED THIS TIME IS FOR TREATMENTS. IT WAS JUST JUDICIAL TREATMENTS. BUT THERE WAS THERE WAS A LOT MORE THAT THAT WASN'T BEING ADDRESSED AT THIS OPIOID RFA THAT WE NEED THAT WE COULD FILL IN HERE AND JUST DO IT IN THE CITY OF MELBOURNE. AFTER DOING AFTER AFTER READING 21 OF THEM, I CAN TELL YOU SOME THINGS, BUT I DON'T THINK WE PROBABLY NEED TO TALK TO JENNY ABOUT HOW TO PRESENT THAT FORWARD. OKAY, I FORGOT TO SAY THE MOST IMPORTANT THING. I HOPE EVERYBODY HAS A REALLY GREAT THANKSGIVING. HAPPY THANKSGIVING EVERYBODY. YEAH, FIND SOMETHING TO GIVE THANKS TO IN YOUR LIFE AND FOCUS ON THAT, OKAY? YES, SIR. REAL QUICK, I WENT TO THE LAND DEDICATION FOR PROVIDENCE PLACE. THAT WAS VERY WELL ATTENDED. EVENT ALSO WENT TO MRS. DOT. I THINK THIS IS HER 28TH ANNUAL COMMUNITY FEEDING THAT THEY DID OVER AT THE EDDIE TAYLOR COMMUNITY CENTER. AND AND I THINK THEY WERE TALKING ABOUT MAYBE NAMING THE KITCHEN AFTER HER OR SOMETHING THAT THEY SHOULD THEY SHOULD. YEAH. SO WANT TO BRING THAT UP AND WE HAVE WE EVER MADE HER EXCEPTIONAL CITIZEN. SHE DID GET THE EXCEPTIONAL CITIZEN I KNOW THAT HAPPENED BEFORE RIGHT BEFORE I GOT ON THE COUNCIL. IT'LL PROBABLY HAPPEN AGAIN.
BUT I THINK NAMING THE KITCHEN WORKING WITH WITH THE STAFF THERE DOING THAT. AND THEN I ALSO ATTENDED THE HISTORIC ARCHITECTURAL REVIEW BOARD AND LINE STREET CEMETERY TALKING ABOUT THAT GRANT AND WHAT THEY'RE TRYING TO DO WITH THE LINE STREET CEMETERY. THAT'S GOING TO BE PRETTY PHENOMENAL. SO I DON'T KNOW HOW THAT'S GOING TO COME UP TO, TO US TO, TO TALK ABOUT THAT. I DON'T KNOW. BUT I THOUGHT THAT WAS REALLY GOOD. THEY'RE LOOKING AT PUTTING WHAT'S IT CALLED, THE WAYMAKER SIGN OR THE SIGN THAT KIND OF TALKS ABOUT SOME THINGS THERE AND THEN AND THEN FINALLY THEY HAVE THE FLORIDA LEAGUE OF CITIES LEGISLATIVE DAYS COMING UP DECEMBER 3RD THROUGH THE FIFTH OVER IN ORLANDO. SO I'LL BE ATTENDING THAT AND THAT'S IT.
ANYTHING? NOTHING TONIGHT? NOTHING. VICE MAYOR. ANYTHING. RIGHT. ALL RIGHT. GO AHEAD. I DON'T HAVE ANYTHING FROM THE LAST COUNCIL MEETING. BUT AS WE GET INTO THE HOLIDAY SEASON, I KNOW THERE'S A LOT OF THINGS COMING UP AND THINGS WE'RE DOING. I AM GOING TO TRY MY BEST TO GET TO THAT MEETING ON TUESDAY. THAT COMMISSIONER MEETING? YOU NEED TO. I NEED A MEETING HERE WITH SOMEONE AT 430, AND THEN I THINK I CAN PROBABLY MAKE IT UP TO THE COMMISSION MEETING RIGHT AFTER THAT, THAT ONE. SO I'M GOING TO RACE UP THERE. NOT TOO FAST. I WON'T SPEED UP. YEAH. AND I'LL BE AT THE BOTH TREE LIGHTINGS AND LOTS OF THINGS COMING UP, SO IT'LL BE FUN. PERFECT. OKAY. AND THEN YEAH WE GOT TO HOPEFULLY NOT GO PAST 11. SO REAL QUICK GREAT JOB ON OUR STAFF WITH THE COUNTY. AND AND ACTUALLY THE OTHER DAY WITH THE PARKHURST ACADEMY, WE HAD THE KIDS COME IN. THAT WAS REALLY GOOD. THE STAFF DID A GREAT JOB.
IT WAS REALLY GOOD. THE STAFF DID A GOOD JOB AND SO APPRECIATE ALL THAT. EVERYBODY HAVE A HAPPY THANKSGIVING AND LIKE I SAID AND AND ENJ
* This transcript was compiled from uncorrected Closed Captioning.